"Harper government seeking alternatives to troubled F-35 fighter jet: sources"
by John Ivison, National Post, November 23, 2012
Source:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/23/harper-government-seeking-alternatives-to-troubled-f-35-fighter-jet-sources/
by John Ivison, National Post, November 23, 2012
Source:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/11/23/harper-government-seeking-alternatives-to-troubled-f-35-fighter-jet-sources/
OTTAWA – The Conservative government will signal it is serious about buying an alternative to the F-35 fighter jet by asking rival manufacturers about the cost and availability of their planes, according to defence industry sources.
The formal request for information will be issued to rivals like Boeing, which produces the Superhornet, and the consortium that makes the Eurofighter Typhoon, asking them what jets are available, and at what cost, if the Canadian government decides to ditch the trouble-plagued F-35 purchase.
The pricing and availability information request falls short of a formal tender but government sources said the “market analysis” will send a signal to voters and industry that it is taking seriously the Auditor-General’s spring report that was heavily critical of the F-35 procurement process.
Rona Ambrose, the Public Works Minister, is now responsible for the F-35 purchase. She has signaled in the House of Commons in recent days that the government is not simply seeking to justify its previous decision to buy the F-35.
“We are looking at all options on the table at this point,” she said Thursday, in response to repeated questions by the NDP. “[The process] is a full evaluation of all choices, not simply a refresh.”
Chris Wattie/ReutersRona Ambrose
When asked Friday whether she would make public the statement of requirements which detail what the military needs from its aircraft, she said these “will be set aside while that full option analysis is done”.
Sources suggest the new secretariat set up within Public Works to look at the F-35 purchase is not comfortable with the previous statement of requirement produced by National Defence, so it is carrying out its own due diligence on what the Royal Canadian Air Force is likely to need in the coming years.
The previous statement of requirement demanded the new aircraft have stealth capabilities to make it difficult for an enemy to detect it by radar. Since the F-35 is the only jet with stealth capability currently being produced by Western manufacturers, critics have accused the process of being rigged in Lockheed Martin’s favour.
Some industry experts have suggested that technological advances may make stealth obsolete within a relatively short space of time. If the government has accepted that thinking, it may decide to open up any competition to aircraft without stealth capability.
By opening up the process, the Conservatives will be able to deflect criticism that has dogged them since they announced their intention two years ago to buy 65 of the fighter jets from Lockheed Martin, in a deal the Department of National Defence would cost $16-billion to purchase and maintain the planes.
Last April, the Office of the Auditor General issued a report that questioned the accuracy of DND’s cost estimates. The report said National Defence reached the conclusion in 2008 that the F-35 offered “the best value” but provided little analysis to support the conclusion and did not provide operational requirements to Public Works until after the government had announced its decision to go with the plane.
The government subsequently produced a seven point plan to address the A-G’s concerns, which included freezing the funding envelope and creating the new secretariat within Public Works to co-ordinate the replacement for the CF18s.