famvburg said:Su-17 fuselage with Su-7 wing?
Most likely the same fuselage for the S-56 as the one on the S-54.A decision was made to return to a fixed wing design based on a new aerodynamic configuration. A new wing was designed that was fixed at the intermediate sweep (45o) of the original movable wing.
PaulMM (Overscan) said:It would have looked like an Su-17 with wing fixed at 45 degrees.
Yefim Gordon and his co-authors write it would have had a fixed wing.hesham said:and for my Arjen,it was not fixed wing.
the Sukhoi S-54 (Su-17M4N) which later redesigned as S-56 (Su-17M5) was a fixed
wing project version of Su-17,it had 45 degree of swept,can anybody imagine its
shape ?.
the Sukhoi S-54 (Su-17M4N) which later redesigned as S-56 (Su-17M5) was a fixed
wing project version of Su-17,it had 45 degree of swept,can anybody imagine its
shape ?.
From Аэрокосмическое обозрение 2/2020.
the Sukhoi S-54 (Su-17M4N) which later redesigned as S-56 (Su-17M5) was a fixed
wing project version of Su-17,it had 45 degree of swept,can anybody imagine its
shape ?.
From Аэрокосмическое обозрение 2/2020.
Do you think this is accurate to the actual drawings or just a guess?
I imagined the Su-17M4n and Su-17M6 as partly synergising with the S-37 style wing (i.e. low wing-loading cranked delta in the style of the F-16XL or MiG-21I Analog). But I'm juts guessing myself.
Let me guess, this wing is a compound/cranked swept with with 60-degree sweep for inner wing and 45-degree sweep for outer wing?the Sukhoi S-54 (Su-17M4N) which later redesigned as S-56 (Su-17M5) was a fixed
wing project version of Su-17,it had 45 degree of swept,can anybody imagine its
shape ?.
From Аэрокосмическое обозрение 2/2020.
Do you think this is accurate to the actual drawings or just a guess?
I imagined the Su-17M4n and Su-17M6 as partly synergising with the S-37 style wing (i.e. low wing-loading cranked delta in the style of the F-16XL or MiG-21I Analog). But I'm juts guessing myself.
It is accurate, it was described as effectively just fixing the VG sweep wing to its most useful position. There's a model photo in the article hesham cites.