- Joined
- 6 November 2010
- Messages
- 5,196
- Reaction score
- 5,349
Worf.have we had a Transgender Starfleet Captain yet?
Worf.have we had a Transgender Starfleet Captain yet?
According to my translator the correct expression isJusto hails from a land of non-English. Perhaps that's how it's translated into foreignese.
hiThis was an unexpected twist.
Who dis?
megalomania with povertyMessiah or God-complex personalities emerge from the charismatic. Perhaps, not dissimilar from those born to great wealth and feel they are called to a Higher purpose. Someone inevitably tries to take over the world.
Globalism, historical determinism, irreversible social engineering... If only the original writers of the series had lived long enough to see how their beautiful futuristic utopia had evolved... they would have dedicated themselves to selling insurance.The "political" aspect of Star Trek was discussed at length in an amicable thread which was wide ranging and covered it well.
Star Trek was and is a pretty good reflection of its US homeland. Other countries get only cameo roles.
To be fair, the criminal, is using the language of decent people. Hopefully we can get out of the otherr side from this carp between putin, ping, pong and trump with our heads and sensibilities intact.I don't do Cyrillic, but I can do either German or English, or even French, in a pinch. Please, repost your statement in one of those alternatives, with the first two vastly preferred. You *do* realize though that you are using the language of a current war criminal, yes?
Meanwhile back to the differences between the series.
The stars are of course the Enterprise and similar starships.
For about one episode. Then the Starfleet engineers would get to work, and by the end of the season the few remaining Daleks would be repurposed into Starfleet hull scrubbers.The Daleks would make short work of Starfleet.
Starfleet? No. But season 1 of "Strange New Worlds" had a trans "pirate captain," and numerous they/thems have been shown in Starfleet in "Discovery" and "Picard." That's a whole discussion right there.have we had a Transgender Starfleet Captain yet?
My generation failed in what was expected of it, then it was no longer possible to reverse the trend and today's young people suffer the consequences.Meanwhile back to the differences between the series.
The stars are of course the Enterprise and similar starships.
Nothing has been able to recreate the shock of the first Enterprise when it appeared on TV screens. It looked clean and white (on Black and White TV in my home when it first appeared) with a dramatic but understandable shape.
Attempts to re-design the original have all left me not very wowed.
Alien ships have a hard job competing. Geometric shapes seem popular Spheres (Balok) Squares (Borg) Triangles (Tholian).
Alien life forms are less interesting than those in low budget Dr Who. The Daleks would make short work of Starfleet. Cybermen were wearing plumbing items outside their bodies many years before the Borg.
Short skirts are a recurring feature in Who and Trek. Not perhaps surprising as men are the main audience. I no longer watch TV being slightly deaf but have we had a Transgender Starfleet Captain yet?
Very interesting! I think you nailed it. The claim that humanity is free of greed is just as much a fallacy as the Prime Directive, which is sacred only until it doesn't quite serve the Federation's interests.There are those, like Picard, who claim that humanity no longer seeks to acquire wealth. He says this from his palatial family estate, mansion and vineyard, where he has an army of servants to assist him in producing his own family-named brand of wine. At the same time you see his own crew gamble (implying some means of payment) and other humans owning private starships and making bank carrying cargo and passengers. Picard is the very model of the "limousine liberal" in that he is a scion of extreme wealth and privilege, but doesn't recognize it, and lives in a different word from most other people but doesn't understand that.
While that is a theme in this thread,The *actual* line is "He’s dead, Jim",
Several iconic phrases from Star Trek: The Original Series have made their way into the pop culture lexicon, including, "He's dead, Jim." Most often spoken by Dr. Leonard McCoy (DeForest Kelley), this phrase was Bones' rather blunt way of reporting a death to Captain James T. Kirk (William Shatner). While "Live long and prosper" and "Beam me up, Scotty" may be the most famous of the phrases to originate from Star Trek, some variation of "He's dead" was spoken more times throughout the series than either of those lines.
With his gruff personality, Dr. McCoy was not known for his good bedside manner, so it's not surprising he would report deaths rather bluntly. Although the phrase, "He's dead, Jim," is often associated with the death of so-called red shirts, Dr. McCoy never actually used this exact wording in that way. Surprisingly, the exact phrase, "He's dead, Jim," was only spoken by Dr. McCoy four times on Star Trek: The Original Series, although he used some variation of "He's dead" many more times. Here is every time McCoy uttered this now iconic phrase.
Daleks are something of a joke when you've encountered the Borg or Species 8472...For about one episode. Then the Starfleet engineers would get to work, and by the end of the season the few remaining Daleks would be repurposed into Starfleet hull scrubbers.
I'm going to expect that would be true whichever country the series had been produced in be it France, Kenya, Cambodia, or Columbia,Star Trek was and is a pretty good reflection of its US homeland. Other countries get only cameo roles.
"Beam me up, Scotty"While that is a theme in this thread,
enjoy this,
Short skirts are a recurring feature in Who and Trek. Not perhaps surprising as men are the main audience.
Sep 7, 2022 #BehindTheSeams
Star Trek has never been afraid of bold fashion choices, especially for women. And while the short skirts of the '60s original series might seem like a double standard to keep things sexy on the Starship Enterprise, the minidress has a complicated history of female empowerment.
Let's go Behind the Seams!
For feminist critics, miniskirts are a consistent focal point and often assumed to be a sexist symbol, particularly since women were “forced” to wear them as part of their uniforms. However, when the costumes were designed and originally worn, perceptions were very different. Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura (the most visible woman on the show and a groundbreaking character for racial integration), discussed the issue in her autobiography:
“In later years, especially as the women’s movement took hold in the seventies, people began to ask me about my costume. Some thought it “demeaning” for a woman in the command crew to be dressed so sexily. It always surprised me because I never saw it that way. After all, the show was created in the age of the miniskirt, and the crew women’s uniforms were very comfortable. Contrary to what many may think today, no one really saw it as demeaning back then. In fact, the miniskirt was a symbol of sexual liberation. More to the point, though, in the twenty-third century, you are respected for your abilities regardless of what you do or do not wear.”
Which wouldn't even leave a smudge after an unfriendly encounter with a Vorlon, Walkers of Sigma 957 or Shadow fleet. Just remember none of them are real, powers are crafted from thin air by their writers.Daleks are something of a joke when you've encountered the Borg or Species 8472...
According to Heinlein, there is an inexplicable historical relationship between the length of women's skirts, the length of men's beards, and the price of gold.The thing seems to be a bit less one-dimensional than that,
and,
https://www.vintag.es/2013/05/mini-skirts-in-star-trek-1966.html
They were selling a different product.
And sadly, it's a product that's not selling. The people who really consider themselves fans are, like myself, generally a bunch of old farts. We're fans of the Golden Age of Trek, from TOS to ENT. But nothing *since* 2005 has worked to really gain new fans. None of the movies or series have done much to excite the existing fanbase, and they've done squat to entice *new* fans. Partially this is because virtually all Trek shows these days are now of the "overarching season-long story arc" variety, which means if you miss an episode you're SOL; but mostly I think it's because they just plain suck.And that connects with what Star Trek ultimately is, a product that's for sale.
TOS/TAS because of Star Fleet Battles. Played that a lot as a kid. I've kinda slowed down to the simplified Federation Commander rule set, though. Don't have time to relearn all the SFB rules and interactions!My question for all the Trekkies out here: which series is your favorite and why?
Ḣ̷̙̘̹͎̲̮̰̥͔̱̄̀̃͌̋̀̑͘ͅǫ̷̰̜̯͓̖̪̱̖̥̦̻͈͋̊́̉̋̋̏̈́̀̉̒͛͝w̵͖͕̹͍̜̣̓̆͒̏̑̐̔͐̔̏́̒͑̚ ̶̝̩̲̬̺̖̹̮̋̈͆́̎̽̊̉͗ǎ̸͇͙͕͇͒̔́͐͂̔͂͊b̶̛̰̗̘̟̠̟͗̈́̋͊̀̈̋̉́o̸̰̯̝͐͊͑̒ǘ̷̢̡̩͓̣͇̣̮̜t̵̛̪͈̫̦̳͕͙̠̖͕̿̍̈́͗̓͒̔̀̎̄̚͘͝͝ ̷̨̩͇̰̝̩̈͑͛̎̆̂̍̽̈́b̸̡̨̜̪͍̩̪̬̮̟͙̮̓́͊̊̄̎̈͝à̴͎̗̖̻̒̈́͋̾̂̿̈́̕d̷̨̘̺̣̝̺͉̟͖̝̖͙̞͗͗͘̕͠͠ͅ ̶̢̫̪͈̤̞̻̄̓̑̌̒͗̉̔͘E̵̡̛̳̜͙̬̜̯͔̓͛͌̎͒̃͘͝n̷̳̟̈́͑͋͌́͘͝ͅͅg̶̹̗͈̎̎̌͆̉̃l̸̢̹̙̟̺̹̲̩̘̈́͒̏͘͠î̸̓̄̐͘͝ͅs̷͚͚̻̣̭͓̝̯̓͑̽̈̎̀̅͑̈́̾͊͝h̴̤̰̬̎̀̊̑̐͑͋͊͝͠͝͝͠?̸͕̜̹̆̔͋͗̊͛̊͗͝͝
There is justifiable cause for SFB sometimes being nicknamed "Starfleet accounting".TOS/TAS because of Star Fleet Battles. Played that a lot as a kid. I've kinda slowed down to the simplified Federation Commander rule set, though. Don't have time to relearn all the SFB rules and interactions!
Okay, what font is that, I need to install it on my computer!
While no real man objects to a woman (or another man, for that matter) packing heat, that particular position/orientation of the pistol seems terribly non-ergonomic.At the same time, U.N.C.L.E. agents wore skirts above the knee and a pistol on the back of their belts...
Even more the caseThe Daleks would make short work of Starfleet.
The purpose of using that position was an attempt to differentiate the clothing of both genders, something like the position of the buttons: right for women, left for men and I seem to remember that there was also that custom in the way of wearing the watch.While no real man objects to a woman (or another man, for that matter) packing heat, that particular position/orientation of the pistol seems terribly non-ergonomic.
1) It'd make sitting on a normal chair difficult and uncomfortable
2) It makes grabbing by someone else easy and difficult to defend against
3) It makes it difficult for the *woman* to quickly and reliably retrieve and bring to bear.
Just put it on the hip. Or a shoulder holster if need be.
Don't forget that it was Grace Lee Whitney, the actress who played Yeoman Janice Rand, who pushed Roddenberry into creating that miniskirt uniform!According to Heinlein, there is an inexplicable historical relationship between the length of women's skirts, the length of men's beards, and the price of gold.
During the early days of Star Trek, the idea was to sell us a better future if we were tolerant enough to hire a beautiful African girl, named Swahili, to pick up the phone on the starship. At the same time, U.N.C.L.E. agents wore skirts above the knee and a pistol on the back of their belts... They were selling a different product.
In later years, especially as the women’s movement took hold in the seventies, people began to ask me about my costume. Some thought it “demeaning” for a woman in the command crew to be dressed so sexily. It always surprised me because I never saw it that way. After all, the show was created in the age of the miniskirt, and the crew women’s uniforms were very comfortable. Contrary to what many may think today, no one really saw it as demeaning back then. In fact, the miniskirt was a symbol of sexual liberation. More to the point, though, in the twenty-third century, you are respected for your abilities regardless of what you do or do not wear.
comp-geeks article said:At the same time, in the 1960s, longtime editor of Cosmopolitan magazine Helen Gurley Brown was promoting the idea of the “single girl” in her magazine and several bestselling books. Brown’s single girl was professional and successful, but also playful and sexual. She was single and desirable, but had little or no interest in marriage or children, which in the 1950s were the assumed end goals for a woman’s sexuality. Female Starfleet crewmembers embody this idea perfectly. They engage in romances and flirtations with other characters, clad in symbols of sexual liberation, but marriage is always presented as incompatible with a Starfleet officer’s life. The contrast is even more apparent when Star Trek is compared to other science fiction programs of the same era such as Lost in Space, which simply transposed traditional female housekeeping roles onto another planet.
Colorful miniskirts played one final role, again embedded in trends and concerns of the time: They reassured an anxious public that femininity wouldn’t disappear in the space age. The first woman had already flown to space in 1963, Soviet cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova. Her “mannish” and militarized appearance seemed to indicate dangerously unstable gender roles. While Star Trek challenged those roles with its scripts — even challenging heteronormativity in important ways — miniskirts helped camouflage those statements and make them palatable for the audience.
With most women's waists, a pistol on the belt is difficult to draw. A shoulder holster is better for curvy women.While no real man objects to a woman (or another man, for that matter) packing heat, that particular position/orientation of the pistol seems terribly non-ergonomic.
1) It'd make sitting on a normal chair difficult and uncomfortable
2) It makes grabbing by someone else easy and difficult to defend against
3) It makes it difficult for the *woman* to quickly and reliably retrieve and bring to bear.
Just put it on the hip. Or a shoulder holster if need be.
The Federation tech level likely allows to change sex functionally, so for Federation it's likely a moot point; anyone who feels "not living in the right body" could likely just reconstruct his/her body up to the chromosome level.no longer watch TV being slightly deaf but have we had a Transgender Starfleet Captain yet?
The Federation tech level likely allows to change sex functionally, so for Federation it's likely a moot point; anyone who feels "not living in the right body" could likely just reconstruct his/her body up to the chromosome level.
Nah, Federation is extremely paranoid about genetic manipulations and it didn't went well with Vulcan's IDIC.It seems entirely reasonable that whenever a women gets pregnant she goes in for a scan of the fetus; they check its structure, its genetics and its epigenetics. Any detectable problems would likely be fixed on the spot with Magic Techno Medical
Yeah, a good way to dealt with such lunacies as religious beliefs, for example)So if this issue arises later in life, a few minutes under the Neural Neutralizer can likely clear it up.
And since Federation clearly allows a significant level of political dissent (all those "weird colonies" that Picard & Co visited constantly), we could safely assume that Federation did not like to brainwash its citizens unless they are truly unrepetant criminal types.Or indeed any other inconvenient ideological leanings. Brave New World.