Heatloss
ACCESS: Confidential
- Joined
- 23 December 2023
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 144
The Canadian document for it explicitly states attenuation of 1/10 db/mile to water in the atmosphere. K used to encompass Ku and Ka, and given that attenuation of 1/10 db/mile, I suspect it's a low Ku band seeker, so not far off from the upper bounds of X, which would suffer less against clouds and rain unlike the other frequencies in the K band.Think they'd be able to make an 8" diameter X-band seeker that early?
A K-band seeker would be more or less worthless.
Attenuation would be high in clouds, but that's something experienced by X band radars too. I wouldn't call it worthless.