The International Court of Justice. Even the Russians will occasionally listen to its judgements. I would love it to have more authority, but it's the best I can come up with.
OBB:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.10952.pdf
This article is not to be trusted. Behold:
"A major limitation of space based telescopes is that they can not be maintained, refurbished or repaired after launch."
CAN NOT. Not "expensive," or "difficult," or "inconvenient."
CAN NOT.
ERRR. Wrong. And not just kinda-wrong, but *absolutely* wrong. Not only was Hubble maintained, refurbished and repaired after launch, as Starlink makes space launch more profitable, space launch will make space telescope maintenance, refurbishment and repair easier and cheaper.
Additionally, later on the article says something that should utterly negate all interest in the issue:
Also, as it turns out, according to the Outer Space Treaty and its progeny, there are no private companies operating in outer space, but only governments can operate in outer space.
"Only governments can operate in outer space" is offensively wrong, both as a principle and *I* *believe* in terms of what the treaty actually says. The United States should not be party to any such treaty, but should instead promote private enterprise in the exploration and *exploitation* of outer space.
The article ends with:
The right to see the sky in natural state belongs to our rights and freedoms alikethe right to breath unpolluted air, drink cleanwater or sleep in a quiet environment during the night.
Hello... *cities?* If this is the argument they choose to make, then Starlink at its worst is a far, far lesser issue than city lights, traffic noise, trains, etc.