A launch planned for Friday from the Space Coast will test a possible solution. SpaceX will experiment with a non-reflective coating on the bottom of one satellite in its next batch of 60, scheduled to lift off from launch complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 11:20 p.m.
A launch planned for Friday from the Space Coast will test a possible solution. SpaceX will experiment with a non-reflective coating on the bottom of one satellite in its next batch of 60, scheduled to lift off from launch complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 11:20 p.m.
Astronomers say SpaceX's satellites are too bright in the sky. Friday's launch will try to fix that
They were seen sparkling across the skies of Montana right around Christmas: a tidy row of lights that some mistook to be UFOs. The glowing celestial train has been spotted in California, Texas, in the Netherlands and even Chile.phys.org
It's a pity SpaceX wasn't flying rockets in 1950.A launch planned for Friday from the Space Coast will test a possible solution. SpaceX will experiment with a non-reflective coating on the bottom of one satellite in its next batch of 60, scheduled to lift off from launch complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station at 11:20 p.m.
Astronomers say SpaceX's satellites are too bright in the sky. Friday's launch will try to fix that
They were seen sparkling across the skies of Montana right around Christmas: a tidy row of lights that some mistook to be UFOs. The glowing celestial train has been spotted in California, Texas, in the Netherlands and even Chile.phys.org
I hope that the experimental coating works on the satellite, it is a pity that they couldn't put it on the first lot of satellites before they reached orbit
Hall and other astronomers said that, like SpaceX, they were surprised by how bright the Starlink satellites appeared. “What surprised everyone — the astronomy community and SpaceX — was how bright their satellites are,” Seitzer said. “We knew these tens of thousands of megaconstellations were coming, but based on the sizes and shapes of things currently in orbit, I thought they’d be maybe eighth or ninth magnitude. We were not expecting second or third magnitude.”
Both astronomers and SpaceX said they hope, as an initial step to get the Starlink satellites dim enough to not be visible to the naked eye even in the darkest skies. The next step will be to figure out what else can be done to mitigate their effects on major observatories, specifically the Vera Rubin Observatory (formerly Large Synoptic Survey Telescope) under construction in Chile. Astronomers said that wide-field telescope was particularly threatened by Starlink and other megaconstellation satellites.
Do keep in mind that a design goal and what will realistically happen are two different things - funding 10,000 launches a year (even if the 'stuff' you're sending and the launch cost combined is something like $10 million a launch, for $100 billion a year), will be challenging without a very pressing objective. I consider myself optimistic about human colonisation of Mars, but I think it's going to be a fair bit slower than Elon hopes.
I’d love to know the thinking that says Space X are a more risky prospect when one has established launchers to space and one doesn’t. They seem to have used the fact that Starship is a risky project to penalise them across the board.SpaceX presses on with legal fight against U.S. Air Force over rocket contracts
SpaceX has asked the U.S. District Court of the Central District of California to hold a hearing on March 2 to consider the company’s protest against the U.S. Air Force.spacenews.com
More from Hazegrayart. Starship moon landing. Shows it using a prepared but pretty small landing pad.
More from Hazegrayart. Starship moon landing. Shows it using a prepared but pretty small landing pad.
IMHO the moon-equipped variant would require a special landing legs...
Interesting question. I assume both Spacex and Blue Origin landing legs have some small amount of travel to cushion landing shock but maybe not. Depends on how accurately you can control terminal descent velocity. I think the crush absorbers on Falcon 9 are there because of the unpredictable pitch/roll motion of the landing barge.
Is that what they were shooting for?8.5 Barr achieved.