Reply to post #848:
Regarding the 120mm guns, personal think the 120mm gun is little bit too big for the wheeled vehicles.
I wholeheartedly agree with you. This whole business of putting enormous guns into armoured cars is silly. The only facet where a 120mm will besuperior to a NATO 105mm gun is if the car engages a modern, Western MBT. This is obviously not a role for a lightly armoured, armoured car. In all other aspects the 105 will be superior or equal to the120: the 105 is lighter allowing a lighter vehicle, has less inertia allowing lighter layer and trainer motors and easier stabilizing and the 105 equipped vehicle will carry more ammunition. Furthermore, the 105 Rooikat has no muzzle brake. If you fit a 120 to a vehicle <30 tons, it has to have a muzzle brake, resulting in enormous blast an noise when the piece is discharged.
Regarding the 120mm guns, personal think the 120mm gun is little bit too big for the wheeled vehicles.
I wholeheartedly agree with you. This whole business of putting enormous guns into armoured cars is silly. The only facet where a 120mm will besuperior to a NATO 105mm gun is if the car engages a modern, Western MBT. This is obviously not a role for a lightly armoured, armoured car. In all other aspects the 105 will be superior or equal to the120: the 105 is lighter allowing a lighter vehicle, has less inertia allowing lighter layer and trainer motors and easier stabilizing and the 105 equipped vehicle will carry more ammunition. Furthermore, the 105 Rooikat has no muzzle brake. If you fit a 120 to a vehicle <30 tons, it has to have a muzzle brake, resulting in enormous blast an noise when the piece is discharged.