Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion Heavy Lift Replacement (HLR)

Why is it that this has lost out overall as a model to the Chinook for foreign sales?

Slightly digressing, the German STH selection is not quite crystal clear as now it turns out the H-47 purchase is double the cost


cheers
 
Why is it that this has lost out overall as a model to the Chinook for foreign sales?

Slightly digressing, the German STH selection is not quite crystal clear as now it turns out the H-47 purchase is double the cost


cheers
Boeing costs more than they said it would?

C_nGkqbXsAQu__-.jpg
 
Detail of the CTFD, Containerized Flight Training Device:

The-Composite-Maintenance-Trainer.png.pc-adaptive.480.medium.png


 
Why is it that this has lost out overall as a model to the Chinook for foreign sales?

Slightly digressing, the German STH selection is not quite crystal clear as now it turns out the H-47 purchase is double the cost


cheers
Boeing costs more than they said it would?

View attachment 693447
Shades of LM there?
 
Now that's begs one crazy question. Could a CH-53K lift a F-35B and then drop it midair - and then the F-35B flies away ?

No.

For this test, the F-35 was stripped down, including having the engine removed.

More prosaically, I'm not sure where the quick releases are in this rig but I suspect they're at the helo end of the harness. In which case you end up trying to fly a plane with several hundred pounds of heavy chain banging around in the airflow.
 
35 more CH-53K contracted (the first contract post FRP) with 8 for IDF (that will now have 12 on order) :


Notice how the unit cost (extrapolated only) has slightly nosed down.
 
Nice video, it has that funny frame rate effect where the rotors are hardly moving.
I do love videos like that...


New USN contract for 6 new LRIP King with support (550M$):

which puts LRIP cost-per-plane including support at $91.67mil.


35 more CH-53K contracted (the first contract post FRP) with 8 for IDF (that will now have 12 on order) :


Notice how the unit cost (extrapolated only) has slightly nosed down.
2700/35 = $77.14mil flyaway cost.

That's already $10mil less than one of the early claims on flyaway cost, a roughly 13% reduction.
 
I might be wrong, but IMHO the Hebrew word "Pere" means "bull" in English.
Source (X fka twitter):
View: https://x.com/Israel_MOD/status/1904205854179840033?t=skzCCtu7A6jI6iwsMGqwTA&s=19

The Hebrew word they are using is פרא, which I think more usually means "Wild Ass," an undomesticated donkey native to to the region. Google wants to translate it as just "Wild" but that's not quite right.

 
When פרא (pereh) was used as the designator for a Magach variant (the missile launcher for Tammuz, then Spike N-Loss missiles) 15-20 years ago, Tsahal used the translation "Onager".
Which is indeed a specific species of wild donkey, cited in the Bible.
 
When פרא (pereh) was used as the designator for a Magach variant (the missile launcher for Tammuz, then Spike N-Loss missiles) 15-20 years ago, Tsahal used the translation "Onager".
Which is indeed a specific species of wild donkey, cited in the Bible.
And was also a Roman artillery piece.
 
Indeed, but in this case it is about the wild ass from the tanakh (Job 39:5), because the heyl ha'avir now names its helos after animals, like petrel, owl, cobra, viper, bat.
Ah, gotcha.

I was actually meaning the Pereh "tank" with the artillery reference, though.
 


Write your reply...

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom