Russian PAK TA Future Transport Project ('Ermak' Study)

yes, I guess this is some V-D top staff napkin art like "An-124-102"
but apparently has no relationship to PAK VTA
MORE, IL-106 =/= Ermak
 

Attachments

  • 1726277_original (1).jpg
    1726277_original (1).jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 320
Yet another Volga-Dnepr concept to replace the An-124 that will be claimed to be a PAK TA concept.

"Is this the heavyweight successor to the An-124?"
Posted on 28th July 2017 by Nigel Tomkins

Source:
https://aircargoeye.com/is-this-the-heavyweight-successor-to-the-an-124/

VOLGA-DNEPR, Russia’s biggest cargo airline – and a world leader in the airfreighting of out-of-gauge and heavyweight shipments – believes this (above) could be the eventual replacement for the iconic An-124 freighter family, writes Nigel Tomkins.

The company is not only devising technical specifications for the modernisation and continuation of its existing fleet of Antonov An-124-100 airlifters, but is also investigating the creation of a new future replacement for the super heavy cargo transporter, as these design images show.

The new heavy airfreighter would be 35 to 40 per cent more efficient than the An-124, both technically and economically.

The future big and heavy airfreight market will need an aircraft with a minimum 150-to-170-tonne payload – and a range of up to to 10,000 kilometres, enabling it to perform a commercial non-stop flight across the Pacific Ocean, for example.

By comparison, the current commercial range of a fully loaded An-124-100 (with maximum payload of 120 tonnes) is 4500 km.

The specialist carrier currently operates 12 An-124-100s – the commercial version of the An-124 Ruslan military aircraft – and the world’s largest production aircraft.

Facing the need to continuously maintain the airworthiness of these 40-year-old cargo jets, whilst also regularly upgrading them to meet new ICAO and other international requirements, Volga-Dnepr’s analysts say the An-124-100 will be obsolete by 2040, forcing the company to cease the aircraft’s operations and replace them with something else.
The search for a heavyweight replacement is a top priority

That makes the search for an advanced super capable aircraft a top priority for the airline.

“The aircraft that will eventually replace the Ruslan should be something revolutionary, new and more capable by any definition,” Victor Tolmachev, the An-124’s legendary chief designer and, as of today, technical director of Volga-Dnepr has revealed to influential air transport information source Russian Aviation Insider.

According to both Tolmachev, and to an evaluation provided by Ernst & Young, in order to stay in the oversized and super heavy cargo transportation business – and even more so to be able to grow it – the company will need 40 to 100 of the new airfreighters.

“The rising markets of airspace, mining and oil industries indicate that the demand for oversized and super heavyweight transport services will do nothing but grow,” Mikhail Smirnykh, Volga-Dnepr’s CEO, told Russian Aviation Insider at the latest MAKS-2017 airshow.

That is why providing specialist shipping services for the aerospace and aviation sector, for example, remains a primary focus for the company. “We have long-term contracts with the industry’s main players, such as Boeing, Airbus, Rolls-Royce, Spirit and others.

“Remarkably, in the January-May 2017 period, the An-24-100 airspace cargo sector grew by 23 per cent year-on-year,” he revealed.

With the projected future market growth and an expanding global presence, and based on its own operational expertise and customer service experience, Volga-Dnepr has come up with a set of minimum requirements that the new super heavyweight airlifter should satisfy.

Tolmachev stresses that the future airlifter should be designed to comply with ICAO requirements up to the year 2060. The aircraft will have 100 per cent automated flight functionality and will require new and more fuel-efficient powerplants compared to the Ruslan’s D-18 engines.

“In the 1970-80s, the D-18 was a highly advanced engine offering great potential. But now we need a powerplant to live up to 2040-2060 expectations and standards. That is compelling us to consider all possible options that both the Russian and the global aviation industry can offer. Roughly, the new engine should resemble the Boeing 747-8’s GEnx-2B67 – but outperform it,” Tolmachev explains.

According to Volga-Dnepr’s technical director, neither Russian, nor foreign aircraft manufacturers, currently have on their drawing boards a viable project of a supersize, heavyweight air freighter that would even come close to matching the An-124’s performance levels. To make this future aircraft a reality, its design should start now, so that the initial serial-number airlifters could stay in service until 2070 and be actively operated during the 2060s.

“Such complicated technical and economic tasks cannot be accomplished alone. They require that companies and public authorities get together and unite their efforts in searching for the right solution,” Tolmachev adds.

The cargo airline is always striving to enhance the availability of its oversized cargo services, CEO Smirnykh points out. By the end of 2017 Volga-Dnepr will have launched five operational bases across the globe, namely at Hanoi (Vietnam), London (UK), Leipzig (Germany), Huston (USA) and Sharjah (UEA).

Each of the hubs will offer maximum competence in its ability to serve customer needs in the best possible way. Therefore the Russian carrier is looking to perform light maintenance checks on all its aircraft locally, thereby cutting down the number of costly ferry flights, whilst also improving on the image of the reliability of services in south-east Asia, the USA, the UAE and Europe.

Boris Rybak, head of Russia’s Infomost Consulting company, endorses the words of the An-124’s chief designer by saying that the new super heavy cargo aircraft will most likely be created by an international conglomerate.

“Nowadays, the needs of a single state, no matter how big it is, are not able to generate the demand that would be sufficient enough to pay back the investments.

“In this case, it would be prudent to combine the technical and project designing competence of western countries (probably the United States) with the unique experience of the Russian carrier in operating various types of cargo aircraft including ramp types.

“Volga-Dnepr has managed to build up a unique background in the sphere of air logistics which will definitely help in drafting the list of precise technical requirements for the new super heavy airlifter,” he says.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Volga-05.jpg
    Volga-05.jpg
    363.1 KB · Views: 237
  • Volga-01.jpg
    Volga-01.jpg
    330.2 KB · Views: 220
  • Volga-02.jpg
    Volga-02.jpg
    128 KB · Views: 207
  • Volga-03.jpg
    Volga-03.jpg
    94.1 KB · Views: 184
  • Volga-04.jpg
    Volga-04.jpg
    345.3 KB · Views: 233
This is MSTUCA undergraduate student project that apparently will go nowhere just like others V-D plans.
 
well lifting body seems popular. Except that... when someone think "let's stretch this"
 
I'm not sure whether this is related to the topic being discussed, but I came across this design called the Il-106 Slon (Elephant).

TsAGI has designed the concept of the airlifter and its construction. The next stage was the production of the model of the following size - 1.63 meters in length, wingspan of 1.75 meters, height - 0.5 meters.

Most of it is made of aluminum alloys while stressed elements are made of steel. The weight is acceptable for trials in various wind tunnels (maximum weight is 120 kg).

The model has an uninterrupted wing with dismountable stubs, the fuselage, horizontal fins with declinable two-section elevating rudders, vertical fins with two-section guidance rudders, engine nacelles with pylons and landing gear spat.

"The production of Slon heavy airlifter model was done by stages on digital precision tools. The most intensive was the wing work which has a sophisticated spatial form to ensure high aerodynamic characteristics at cruising regimes," deputy head of the technological department of the institute Andrey Sidorov said.

The model is transformable and can be tested in various configurations. The technological split of the model provides major possibilities to modify the elements of the aerodynamic design, including a change of the front and tail of the fuselage, wing stubs and landing gear spat.

The Slon model will soon be tested in T-106 wind tunnel of variable density. The institute will study its aerodynamic characteristics at cruising regimes. In 2020, Slon tests will continue in T-106 and T-102 tunnels to study aerodynamics at takeoff and landing regimes. The flowing of the model will be visualized.

Slon is to replace An-124 airlifter. It can carry large cargoes to 7000 km at a speed of 850 km/h. Maximum commercial payload is 180 tons (An-124 - 120 tons). The airstrip has to be three kilometers long. Slon is to be powered by Russian PD-35 engines. - Air Recognition

Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • Ilyushin Il-106 Slon.jpg
    Ilyushin Il-106 Slon.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 225
Also, dose anyone here speak Russian?
 

Attachments

  • Ilyushin Il-106 heavy transport.jpg
    Ilyushin Il-106 heavy transport.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 236
  • Ilyushin Il-106 Slon heavy transport.jpg
    Ilyushin Il-106 Slon heavy transport.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 242
you can put this into google translator
 

Attachments

  • Krutov_Pigusov_CHernavskikh_CHernousov_rus.pdf
    2.3 MB · Views: 55
"Slon" is just a bit larger and taller "Condor" with modern avionics and low-consumption engines. And unclear perspectives.
At the first stage, I think, the existing "Condors" will be modernized with the installation of PD-28 engines and new avionics. "Slon" will be a second stage in mid 2030s.
 
Last edited:

Russia Pursues Development Of New Military Transport Aircraft​

Russia Pursues Development Of New Military Transport Aircraft | Aviation Week Network

The Russian defense ministry has contracted the development of new Ilyushin Il-100 super-heavy transport.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com

RUSAIRLIFT_2b-Russian_Defense_Ministry_0.jpg
 
Would it be a Chinese design, the social media all over would once again call it a copy!
Click to expand...

This is what the reputation about.

As for the Il-100 itself, it will be produced at "Aviastar" plant. Engines - PD-24(26). Designation "100" indicates the load capacity. Strategic "Slon" apparently cancelled.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r5KHltcwY4


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vegbvO6u_-U

Here you can compare An-124 with Il-106, which is the conceptual predecessor of the Il-100.
 

Attachments

  • scale_1200.png
    scale_1200.png
    352.2 KB · Views: 85
Last edited:

Thanks for the info, but besides a surely existing requirement, how likely and realistic is it to ever materialise?

As such, pardon to be again the one who ruins the party, but they so far didn't get the much smaller and simpler Il-112 ready and now such a monster without an engine available??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deino said:
Thanks for the info, but besides a surely existing requirement, how likely and realistic is it to ever materialise?

As such, pardon to be again the one who ruins the party, but they so far didn't get the much smaller and simpler Il-112 ready and now such a monster without an engine available??
Click to expand...
112 had two major problems: it was overweight (which, allegedly was solved and next test plane supposed to be less heavy) and the second being overtuned TV7-117ST engines. Russia lacks new turboprop engines with power over 3k hp, so they tuned TV7-117. Looks like TV7-117 allegedly also recieved cerification in 2023, but that's likely less powerful and throttled variants for TVRS-44 and Il-114. But there are mentions that 114 production is moving 1 year forward (it was planned this year, but some sources say it will start in 2025), so there might be some teething issues, though it may not concern engine.

There are mentions of 112 with PD-8 engine, but it's essentially a new plane in this case.

For Il-100 engine is developed from scratch: PD-35 family (or they can use D-18T as stopgap. Looks like Russia did started low-rate production to support their An-124 fleet, if that report to Shoigu is to be believed), we'll see how it's turns out.

Also, unlike Il-112, I don't think that this plane they would develop in their lonesome. I expect both TsAGI's and Sukhoi's and Yakovlev's help.
 
None of Russias commercial aircraft projects have made progress over the last decade, so I have little faith in a strategic transport.
Comac C929 - China decided to go it alone after not making any progress during a decade of joint development.
Irkut MC-21 - Attempt to modernise a decades old design
Superjet 100 - Fashioned from foreign parts in early 2000's and an availability rate lower than 25% (for a commercial airliner!), the only foreign operator went bankrupt and the intellectual property to manufacture them outside domestic use and international marketing rights were sold off.
 
Superjet 100 was sold to Markab Capital Investments in 2023, the parts fabrication plants in Mexico were shut down the same year.
Comac dissolved the partnership with Russia in August 2023 and said it was going back to the design board.
MC-21 has had numerous design changes and alteration to materials since the first prototypes were completed (which experienced wing box cracking) and first deliveries not using old stocks of foreign parts and PW1000G engines not now expected until 2027-2030.

They even proposed to restart mass production of legacy Tu-204/214 and IL-96.

Frankly if you dont think Russian commercial aircraft production is a shambles you are deluded.
 
Last edited:
Deino said:
Thanks for the info, but besides a surely existing requirement, how likely and realistic is it to ever materialise?

As such, pardon to be again the one who ruins the party, but they so far didn't get the much smaller and simpler Il-112 ready and now such a monster without an engine available??
Click to expand...
Hard to guess.
Until 2022 it looked somewhat reasonable, if ambitious.
But now industry is expected to go from half-stasis into gallop amid war - i.e. literally all soviet design houses now have large, "flagship", projects with delivery time within this decade (other than MiG...and Antonov).
How it's expected to be solved - no idea.
 
Several clean sheet projects have been developed in Russia over the last 30 years, some/most of which progressed to the OKR stage and one (very complex) resulted in an aircraft that is operationally deployed:

- T-50/Su-57 (PAK FA)
- T-75 (LTS)
- Izdeliye 80 (PAK DA)
- Izdeliye 41 (PAK DP)
- Il-212 (LVTS?)
- Il-100 (PAK VTA)
- PMKI (Izdeliye 49?)
...

The former was largely a technological breakthrough and was materialized during a very difficult period of the last decade.

After the 2022 sanctions, Russia began to pay much more attention to the security of domestic technologies, which is supported by the fairly significant economic growth that occurred after the sanctions were applied.

In addition, the formation of the base of the new generation of power units, based on the gas generators of 2 new key products (Al-51F1 and PD-14), was practically completed.

We will see what fruits this development will have in the current decade.
 
WatcherZero said:
Superjet 100 was sold to Markab Capital Investments in 2023, the parts fabrication plants in Mexico were shut down the same year.
Comac dissolved the partnership with Russia in August 2023 and said it was going back to the design board.
MC-21 has had numerous design changes and alteration to materials since the first prototypes were completed (which experienced wing box cracking) and first deliveries not using old stocks of foreign parts and PW1000G engines not now expected until 2027-2030.

They even proposed to restart mass production of legacy Tu-204/214 and IL-96.

Frankly if you dont think Russian commercial aircraft production is a shambles you are deluded.
Click to expand...
Where did you pick up this BS?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom