the Japanese design did not meet RAN requirements and was in significant ways, inferior to the inservice Collins Class.
Japanese and German options were found not to meet the stated requirements, legacy design features in each (both were the result of continuous evolution over decades) made them less advanced in many ways than the existing Collins Class (which was a clean sheet design from the late 80s early 90s), and more importantly, than the French offering. The Barracuda was pretty much a clean sheet design, providing a hull of the required size, as well as all the associated auxiliary systems with the signature issues already sorted, it was the best of the short listed options.
Long story short, RAN and JMSDF have far different doctrines when it comes to submarine operations and therefore Soryu wasn't suitable for RAN. Most of them are nothing to do with being "less advanced" as you have put.
JMSDF submarine fleet's doctrine is to contain Chinese fleet and deter them from entering the pacific. Their operations mainly circles around ambushing around their own version of "island chain", basically a line that starts from Kyushu, continues across Okinawa and leads to Senkaku. This meant poor range, as opposed to Australian requirements. Also the output power of the propulsion system of Soryu is lower than that of Collins, meaning longer charge time for the batteries.
Also because of this doctrine, Soryu class subs are designed for deep sea operation, and by deep, I mean deeeeep (also the reason Li-ion batteries replaced sterling AIP in Ouryu and Touryu. Soryu's AIP is based on Swedish design, which could only operate above 250 m of depth. A huge drawback for the JMSDF). So the ballast of Soryu is quite huge. Coupled with Soryu's double hull and other structural characteristics that are result of the deep sea operations requirement, the actual internal displacement of the submarine wasn't really representative of Soryu's submerged displacement of more than 4,000 tons. Sacrifices were made on the crew compartment. Otoh that kind of submergible depth was an overkill for RAN requirements and RAN favored the exact opposite of Soryu, ie more space for the crew for longer operations.
There are indeed some stuff that Soryu actually is less advanced design-wise, such as the lack of automation, but like I've said, most of the points where Soryu fell short was more to do with the doctrine than the implemented technology.