Really weird aerospace patents

A strange mothership airplane of 1927,carried a fighters,for Mr. R. F. Hall, was he a designer for Bell company later ?.

The patent refers to "auxiliary airplanes" (rather than 'fighters'). And, of course, Hall had been working in aviation for a quarter of a century before he went to Bell ;)

Randolph Fordham Hall (1896-1974)

1916-1917 - Thomas Bros. Airplane Corp
1917 - Standard Aeronautical Corp.
1917-1919 - US Army Air Service Technical Branch
1920-1928 - Thomas-Morse Aircraft Corp.
1928-1941 - Cunningham-Hall Aircraft
- Co-founder with Francis E. Cunningham and William T. Thomas
1941-1959 - Bell Aircraft

BTW, R.F. Hall's younger brother was Ted (Theodore Parsons) Hall. Ted also worked at Thomas-Morse and Cunningham-Hall before going on to Consolidated Aircraft in 1931 as a structural engineer.
 
From Aero Digest 1939,

a strange tailless aircraft to Mr. Max M. Munk.
Not too far off from the Stearman-Hammond YS-1

View attachment 684677
I image things can get "weirder"...yes?
Sure! The Y-1 was selected by the US Navy prior to WW 2 to be one of their premier target drones as the JH-1. It was used in AA gun testing and training from the late 1930's and resulted in the USN completely revising their AA gun training and doctrine because it proved existing doctrine ineffective.
 
The W.E. Herrmann annular wing aircraft.

 

Attachments

  • 5.png
    5.png
    217.1 KB · Views: 91
So weird,Emmons,this designer maybe related to a well known company ?.

"Bell engineer, Paul Emmons was assigned the task of creating the basic aerodynamic layout of the X-2, including where the 40 degree swept wings would be placed on the fuselage."
-- Flypast, Vol. 49 No. 7, page 7

Paul C. Emmons was at the Bell Aircraft Corporation as early as September 1941 (NASA mentions him in Supplementary Spin Tests of a 1/20-Scale Model of the Bell XP-39E Airplane dated 31 August 1942). He was still filing patents on behalf of the Bell Aerospace Corporation in the '60s - eg: in 1963, Emmons filed patent US196088, Ground Effect Vehicle.
 
What was this ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    98.7 KB · Views: 35
  • DVL chp%3A10.1007%2F978-3-642-18484-0_11.pdf
    930.3 KB · Views: 1
Flutter forced excitation via a mechanical oscillator.
An electrical engine generate the frequency of the oscillation and the paddle use airstream force to excite the wing spar (?).
If you would want to do that with the electrical engine, a much heavier set would have to be used, negating, perhaps in most case, the representative aspect of the test.
 
Hi Hesham,

From Aero Digest 1939,

a strange tailless aircraft to Mr. Max M. Munk.

Munk actually was quite an accomplished aerodynamicist who had studied in Germany under Prandtl and played an important role at NACA in their early days:


Regards,

Henning (HoHun)
 
Mr. L. E. Oliver seemed to consider that the more fuselages, the better!
 

Attachments

  • L.E. Oliver, 1941_1.gif
    L.E. Oliver, 1941_1.gif
    41.8 KB · Views: 14
  • L.E. Oliver, 1941_2.gif
    L.E. Oliver, 1941_2.gif
    44.1 KB · Views: 14
  • L.E. Oliver, 1941_3.gif
    L.E. Oliver, 1941_3.gif
    47 KB · Views: 16
Does this mean North American would have had to pay him a license for the F-82?
Unlikely, since the twin-fuselage formula was already extensively studied in various bomber proposals by James V. Martin between 1919 and 1922... Martin event kept at it in his 1939 Oceanplane and 1951 Flying Ship patent applications! Several others also considered twin-fuselage or twin-hull designs during the inter-war era.
 

Attachments

  • MP-1.jpg
    MP-1.jpg
    192.8 KB · Views: 9
  • MP-2.jpg
    MP-2.jpg
    298 KB · Views: 7
  • M.P. 2.jpg
    M.P. 2.jpg
    84.1 KB · Views: 9
  • 1939 (web).png
    1939 (web).png
    241.8 KB · Views: 8
  • 1951 (web).png
    1951 (web).png
    249.9 KB · Views: 8

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom