It will be hard for Germany to find a sensible role in the post Trump NATO.
UK and France have their nuclear deterrents and continuing global commitments. The Baltic and Mediterranean members have clear challenges in their regions.
No longer a frontline state and with an understandable aversion to deploying military force outside its own borders Germany cannot recreate its impressive frontline force of the late 1980s.
In some ways like the US and UK in the past Germany needs to use its continuing economic and industrial muscle to help its neighbours in Poland and elsewhere re-arm.
Nuclear weapons must also come on the table given Putin's apparent willingness to threaten their use. While Germany cannot and should not have them on its own soil it should discuss with Sweden and Finland the possibility of Pershing 2/Hades type weapons hidden in their forests to counter the Iskanders in Kaliningrad and Belarus.
 
Last edited:
While Germany cannot and should not have them on its own soil it should discuss with Sweden and Finland the possibility of Pershing 2/Hades type weapons hidden in their forests to counter the Iskanders in Kaliningrad and Belarus.
Why?
 
It will be hard for Germany to find a sensible role in the post Trump NATO.
UK and France have their nuclear deterrents and continuing global commitments. The Baltic and Mediterranean members have clear challenges in their regions.
No longer a frontline state and with an understandable aversion to deploying military force outside its own borders Germany cannot recreate its impressive frontline force of the late 1980s.
In some ways like the US and UK in the past Germany needs to use its continuing economic and industrial muscle to help its neighbours in Poland and elsewhere re-arm.
While also re arming themself yet it will be hard. The economy isn't going great and the political parties are not really inline with it. Many try to take the rush of support but there actions to follow it are rather dull however the current goverment has achieved more in less than 4 years compared to what merkel did in her 16 years.
Nuclear weapons must also come on the table given Putin's apparent willingness to threaten their use.
Thats are very hard thing to do for any eu country outside the existing users. The NPT ain't for nothing but one can leave with reason (well or not).
While Germany cannot and should not have them on its own soil it should discuss with Sweden and Finland the possibility of Pershing 2/Hades type weapons hidden in their forests to counter the Iskanders in Kaliningrad and Belarus.
Ignoring the political problems (NPT and 2 +4 for example) why should germany not have them?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom