Why not use the original Saenger Antipodal Bomber launch method? A 1.4 kilometer monorail with a 5 degree elevation toward the end. Place spaceplane on it, with two V-2 rocket engines right behind it. They provide the initial boost and you can then land the spaceplane where you'd like.
Why not use the original Saenger Antipodal Bomber launch method? A 1.4 kilometer monorail with a 5 degree elevation toward the end. Place spaceplane on it, with two V-2 rocket engines right behind it. They provide the initial boost and you can then land the spaceplane where you'd like.
Radian Aerospace has set out to build the world’s first single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) spaceplane, the Radian One. The company is designing the fully reusable spacecraft to be not just a spaceplane but also a multifunctional platform, capable of performing a broad array of missions in space, many...
Ok so
-they plan to use methalox. SpaceX claims they can get a specific impulse of 375 seconds, which is pretty high for a non-LH2 propellant combo.
-And then there is the sled up to Mach 0.7. This should scrap 1000 m/s out of ascent to orbit delta-v.
These two elements make Radian SSTO slightly more realistic.
Dumb math
9.81*375*ln((100)/(10))+1000 = 9470 m/s
So
-orbit, maybe
-except with zero payload
-and a propellant mass fraction of 0.90 which will be no picnic for a winged SSTO.
-Boeing built a section of RASV hydrolox tankage, propellant mass fraction 0.88 in 1983 for DARPA HAVE REGION
Dense propellants like methalox can drop ascent to orbit delta-v to 9124 m/s (from the attached document)
I get 1 ton of payload to
9.81*375*ln((100+1)/(10+1))+1000 = 9156 m/s
Conclusion: as usual with SSTOs, payload and even orbit are on the ragged edge, it takes very little to wipe out both.
With the above caveats, I still think Radian is worth trying. A daring and bold atempt at SSTO, using SpaceX breakthroughs in methalox rocket propulsion.
When non-hydrolox, every single second of specific impulse makes a difference. Before SpaceX the highest non-hydrolox isp was the Russian kerolox RD-0124 at 360 seconds. Raptor pushes that to 375 seconds, a non negligible gain particularly for SSTOs.
I browsed an old concept called Maglifter, studied by NASA 30 years ago. The maglev sled would have accelerated to 600 MPH, approximately Mach 0.8: seems Radian will use the same trick.
The present speed record for Maglev train : 375 mph. Wonder how it weights...
A study by Klijn et al. concluded that at an altitude of 15,250 m, a rocket launch with the carrier
vehicle having a zero launch velocity at an angle of attack of 0° to the horizontal experienced a
Δv benefit of approximately 600m/s while a launch at a velocity of 340m/s at the same altitude
and angle of attack resulted in a Δv benefit of approximately 900m/s. The zero launch velocity
situations can be used to represent the launch from a balloon as it has no horizontal velocity.
Furthermore, by increasing the angle of attack of the carrier vehicle to 30° and launching at
340m/s, they obtained a Δv gain of approximately 1,100m/s.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.