- Joined
- 11 March 2006
- Messages
- 8,638
- Reaction score
- 3,556
... a Supersonic experimental Project from Arsenal,based on DFS-346.
... Variation of VG-93? ...
Hey blackkite, no doubt, by shallow angle shape of the diffusers in the front of the engines, they're ramjets. Also, on the preceding page the post by Hesham, I think the engines on the wing tips are ramjets (although shaped differently) see image below. , KevinDo you know what this project was?
Wing tip engines seems to be ramjet.
Variation of VG-93?
Indeed. It was displayed at the 1951 Paris Salon de l'Aéronautique, although it may have been just a mockup.I discovered that Arsenal ARS 5501 was target drone.
Hi Jens,And here's the third variant, the one with canards. It's principally based on the single photo, so
I consulted photos and drawings of the Gerfaut I, which had to my opinion a very similar tailplane
in a similar position. The canards seems to have had a clipped delta planform, for span and shape
I used a drawing of an early Gerfaut layout, which had canards, too, as a pattern. Other differences
to the "standard" 1301 seem to have been limited to the deletion of the pitots in front of the cockpit,
at the fin and at the wing tips, which were replaced by the long pitot with the kinked end at the nose.
And the faired over slot for the tailplane in the fin, of course.
Comments, clues and critics welcome !
Just a small clarification: the Ars 5501 is the answer of Arsenal to the technical program specification for category CT-10 (cible telecommandee). It never became "CT-10", it remained an Ars 5501 throughout its carrer.The Arsenal ARS 5501 target drone became the Nord CT-10.
That's right, but even produced by SNCAN, it remained an Ars 5501, as written in the tail of this one:It is really Arsenal that became Sfecmas in 1952 then SNCAN Nord-Aviation in 1955. The missile Ars 5501 developed by Arsenal was mass produced by Nord in Châtillon and Villeurbanne, and purchased by the French, British, Italian and Swedish air forces.
Additionnal data about Ars 1301, coming from my files and from the Archives Départementales de la Haute-Garonne (AD31).Finished my attempt to merge the best available from the world of drawings and of photos, as,
just as in other cases, those general arrangement drawings are a not quite precise with regards
to details: The upper part of the windshield is more curved, the delta wing is pointed, the nose gear
is different and so on. That's no criticism about those drawings, just a reminder, that general arrangement
drawings are just, what the name implies and no precise and accurate source for details.
If I got it wrong on one point or another, please tell me, interpretation of photos often is a source for
errors.