The company was effectively finished at that point, you can't lose 70% of your workers to a competitor and come back from that.
Game of thrones, baby.Don't take a swing at the big dog and miss.
Sometimes. Depends very much on the company. When the company is staffed with people it needs, and little more, then, yeah, the most valuable ones tend to know their worth. But if you're like pre-Musk Twitter, the most valuable ones were the ones who were willing to stay when things got a little rougher. Of course, in that case it wasn't really case of management messing up, but management actually demanding productivity.In my experience, the best employees, most valuable to the company, can be found amongst those who are ready to jump ship when management messes up.
... while thousands were laid off, not jumping ship.[Twitter]management actually demanding productivity
A great many *did* willingly bail. Musk came on board and the word came down "get ready to put in actual hours," and the cubicles emptied.... while thousands were laid off, not jumping ship.
It's about how sometimes people leave because they're good, and sometimes because they're bad. Twitter and OpenAI seem to demonstrate the opposites.Is this about OpenAI, or is this about Musk - again?
Those leave first, leaving the remaining sods flailing.In my experience, the best employees, most valuable to the company, can be found amongst those who are ready to jump ship when management messes up.
Don't worry, AI is just a fad. It'll never work.So, they are building the Terminator right now.
If AI replaces nothing, then writers and actors have nothing to fear and no need to add anti-AI clauses to their contracts.And AI replaces... uh... replaces... Nothing to see here. Move along.
The operative term here is "strange rumor"...There is strange Rumor in this case.
In internet are stories that Open AI made some kind of break true in AI technology,
Prior Sam Altman being sacked by the Board.
and MS want that tech...
I'm curious if this rumor are true ? and if yes, what they have there ?
Its the ability to abstractly understand that 10+12=22 equals 22 thats the breakthrough... rather than running the calculator sub routine...The fact it can't find a certain solution means that 99% of the time its just bullshitting, copy pasting answers it thinks is right. I would have thought the one thing that computers would be good at would be giving certain answers where there is only one outcome. Obviously not.
The Swing Wing was more insane...It's the Hula Hoop of the 21st Century...
If AI replaces nothing, then writers and actors have nothing to fear and no need to add anti-AI clauses to their contracts.