apparition13
I really should change my personal text
- Joined
- 27 January 2017
- Messages
- 580
- Reaction score
- 1,044
From the pdf:
I thought the YA-10 had superior turn performance, but apparently not. The YA-9 seems to have been a better aircraft in terms of performance. The A-10 decision seems to have been based on a belief it was more survivable, and on the low wing making reloading easier and allowing for wider spacing between pylons (since the A-10 had fuselage pylons) which made carrying munitions easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72b5d/72b5dd4b21feb3a0fbb6c6403bb6156b69f109e8" alt="1634996113509.png 1634996113509.png"
I thought the YA-10 had superior turn performance, but apparently not. The YA-9 seems to have been a better aircraft in terms of performance. The A-10 decision seems to have been based on a belief it was more survivable, and on the low wing making reloading easier and allowing for wider spacing between pylons (since the A-10 had fuselage pylons) which made carrying munitions easier.