Skybolt said:Model in a better shape... Boeing 767-701
hesham said:I found a strange drawing to NASA ATT concept (far right).
Stargazer said:Unless I'm mistaken, a Mach 1.2 design would no longer quite fit the ATT specifications, right? I believe this design is not ATT-related, and that the diagram only shows how the near-Mach 1 ATT would fit between a conventional airliner and a supersonic one.
Jemiba said:From AviationWeek, October 1974 a photo of a model of the GD design:
(sorry for the distortion, it was scanned from a bound volume)
Is this related ?
View attachment 617991
There is a better image over here: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...e-bottle-configurations-etc.16601/post-168592From L+K 9-8/1973,
I tried to collect the first one by my self.
Is this related ?
View attachment 617991
I've seen that one before. My *vague* memory on it says that the caption on it at the time said it was a design for an nuclear-powered airliner. memory could be wrong, caption could have been wrong. But it is durned goofy lookin'.