Hood said:
But I wonder if this was the reason why the F-models dispensed with the wing cannon? It seems odd that if the same shockwave issue occurred with the MG FF that the fences were not looked into again.

A few Fs were tested with wing MGFFs at Estelle, but I have no idea why the idea wasnt proceeded with. Seems like a no brainer.
 
Galland flew a modified F with MG FFs in wings.
(And another one with MG 131 (?) in cowling, that before the Gustav).
 
I believe these show what you are referring to:

223839d1360163937t-gallands-bf-109s-galland_bf109f2_20mmmgff_3.jpg

1-bf-109f-jg26-adolf-galland-audembert-dec-5-1941-051.jpg

attachment.php
 
From 109 F-K Radinger and Schick
 

Attachments

  • 109f mgff wings +IH.jpg
    109f mgff wings +IH.jpg
    196.9 KB · Views: 969
Any original drawing of the bf 109 S? I can't find the topic with those drawing,and I just want to know for wich version the wing was assigned(the F or the E?).
 
sgeorges4 said:
Any original drawing of the bf 109 S? I can't find the topic with those drawing,and I just want to know for wich version the wing was assigned(the F or the E?).

According to an A.I.2(g) report of December 1944 by G E F Proctor, under 'mainplanes': "The wing is very similar in construction to that employed on the Me 109 G-6 but has the following modifications:
(a) The fitting of an air duct between the main spar and the subsidiary spar to which the flaps and ailerons are attached.
(b) Wing flaps extending to root end of wing.
(c) Leading-edge slat throughout the complete span.
The air discharge is directed above the leading-edges of the ailerons and flaps, the width of the discharge slot being found by trial and error. Four widths of slot are available. The air ducts in the wing preclude the use of the normal coolant radiators and an evaporative cooling system has been evolved."
 
I only know of one site with drawings. http://www.oocities.org/heartland/village/4082/int_air/bv155-1.htm
 
sgeorges4 said:
Any official drawing regarding the me 155?

Official drawings of the Me 155 are pretty few and far between. I've only got a couple and the aircraft they depict doesn't look much like the postwar re-draws seen elsewhere. I should also add that, from what I can tell, the Me 155 from 1942 did not evolve into the BV 155. The Me 155 from 1942 was scrapped in all but name and that name was then applied to the P 1091 of 1943 - a new three-stage development as seen elsewhere. Messerschmitt then handed the P 1091 (a mixture of Me 109, Me 209 and new components) over to Blohm & Voss as the 'Me 155' and they completely re-drew it to become something else again.
 

Attachments

  • Me 155 1.jpg
    Me 155 1.jpg
    573.7 KB · Views: 760
  • Me 155 2.jpg
    Me 155 2.jpg
    3.4 MB · Views: 685
Was the wing of the 155 like the redraws? Mid virtually straight spar with evenly tapered planform?

Blohm was really unhappy with the 1091 they were given. A key issue they identified was the spar location, which made the wing torsionally weak. Improving that was precluded as the landing gear meant a torsion box could not be built ahead of the spar, and the radiators in the trailing edge meant that the same could not be done aft of the spar either. They also identified problems with the fuselage and turbo installation, choosing to go for a tubular fuselage structure as this was much easier to design and rework when changes to the turbo occurred.
 
sienar said:
Was the wing of the 155 like the redraws? Mid virtually straight spar with evenly tapered planform?

Blohm was really unhappy with the 1091 they were given. A key issue they identified was the spar location, which made the wing torsionally weak. Improving that was precluded as the landing gear meant a torsion box could not be built ahead of the spar, and the radiators in the trailing edge meant that the same could not be done aft of the spar either. They also identified problems with the fuselage and turbo installation, choosing to go for a tubular fuselage structure as this was much easier to design and rework when changes to the turbo occurred.

Both versions I have simply refer to the aircraft as the 'Me 155' even though one has shorter wings and one longer. The longer wing example has no top view, so I can't tell what the shape was like. The short wing version does have a mid virtually straight spar with evenly tapered planform.
 
can you show the entire drawing of the fuselage or you just got a part of it?
(I want to do a model of this one)
 
I found this one on Asisbiz:
Messerschmitt-Bf-109G4-Erla-flown-by-Karl-Hannes-during-high-altitude-testing-Deurne-Belgium-Mar-1943-01.jpg

Messerschmitt-Bf-109G4-Erla-flown-by-Karl-Hannes-during-high-altitude-testing-Deurne-Belgium-Mar-1943-02.jpg

https://www.asisbiz.com/il2/Bf-109G/Messerschmitt-Bf-109G.html
 
Is this deisgn the blohm und voss 155 A?
15.jpg

The source is here: http://fighters.forumactif.com/t80349p500-luftwaffe-46-et-autres-projets-de-l-axe-a-toutes-les-echellesbf-109-g10-erla-luft46
 
sgeorges4 said:
Is this deisgn the blohm und voss 155 A?
15.jpg

The source is here: http://fighters.forumactif.com/t80349p500-luftwaffe-46-et-autres-projets-de-l-axe-a-toutes-les-echellesbf-109-g10-erla-luft46

No. That's the BV 155 B. As far as is known, there never was a BV 155 A. It went straight from being the Me 155 B to being the BV 155 B.
 
what the me 109 ST look like? Do you have a characterisitic description off this aircraft?
 
DB 627 on a O-nine?
http://me109.airwar1946.nl/family/me209.htm
 
Something about the 109 H:
http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=13823
 
From Авиация и Космонавтика - Выпуск 45 от 1999
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    414.2 KB · Views: 756
somewhat related
 

Attachments

  • bf109f proto wing.jpg
    bf109f proto wing.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 375
From; Messerschmitt "0-Nine" Gallery",

some Projects and Prototypes.
 

Attachments

  • 7.png
    7.png
    156.4 KB · Views: 394
  • 8.png
    8.png
    77.5 KB · Views: 354
  • 9.png
    9.png
    105.2 KB · Views: 367
  • 10.png
    10.png
    213.7 KB · Views: 386
  • 6.png
    6.png
    165.6 KB · Views: 395
  • 5.png
    5.png
    200.1 KB · Views: 384
  • 4.png
    4.png
    220.5 KB · Views: 369
  • 3.png
    3.png
    237.3 KB · Views: 362
  • 2.png
    2.png
    277.4 KB · Views: 353
  • 1.png
    1.png
    96.2 KB · Views: 348
And;
 

Attachments

  • 16.png
    16.png
    96.6 KB · Views: 381
  • 15.png
    15.png
    122.3 KB · Views: 371
  • 14.png
    14.png
    108.5 KB · Views: 383
  • 13.png
    13.png
    129.8 KB · Views: 391
  • 12.png
    12.png
    123.1 KB · Views: 403
  • 11.png
    11.png
    182.9 KB · Views: 414
attachment.php

just found this:
http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=53013
Now,do you have any original drawing of the bf 109 K prototype/mock up design(with a diferent cowling[not a "erla" one])?
 
any drawing or original document regarding the bf 109 K1/K2/K3 ,and concept for the bf 109 K?

thanks for your answer.
 
Messerschmitt Bf109 G-1 through K-4 Engines and Fitting, Jean-Claude Mermet
 

Attachments

  • 109k mockup.png
    109k mockup.png
    77.3 KB · Views: 625
Thanks,I'll do that one withe new bf 109 G10 from eduard and do someone has historical document regarding the bf 109 K14 or is it what if?
http://www.azmodel.cz/2018/10/bf-109k-14/
 
any official drawing regarding the me 155+DB 628? Was the wing form different beside of the span being different between the different variant?
Messerschmitt+Me+155B-ww2shots-air+force.jpg
 
whether there is data on the Me/bf 109A, 109S, 109V models

thank you
 
Hi,
Can anyone give me some good and reliable sources like books, documents or book titles about Me 155 later to be Bv 155. I've got Warplanes of the Third Reich in which there are some information but nit that many so i'm trying to find out some more about this fascinating aircraft. Thanks for all the help in advance.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom