Indeed.sienar said:carsinamerica said:From Hitchcock (Messerschmitt O-Nine Gallery), p. 101:
"The RLM advised Messerschmitt to expedite development of a high altitude fighter by incorporating Me 209H systems directly into the Bf 109H program (see p. 92). Messerschmitt complied, but continued construction of the Me 209H V1, albeit on a low priority basis. Accordingly, early in 1943 a design was advanced based on the Me P.1091a resulting in the Me 209H. Although it was not fitted to the Me 209H V1, the DB 627B [I think this should be DB628 based on other references Hitchcock makes] was selected. Delays protracted its completion until June 1944, and by this time the Me 209 and the DB 627 programs had been cancelled. Therefore, the Me 209H V1 was completed with a DB 603G (similar to the DB 627 but lacking after-cooler and two-stage mechanical supercharger)."
So, there was the Me 209 V1 through V4 (the record-breaker), with the V4 being the proposed fighter.
Then followed the Me 309
Then the revised Me 209, usually called the Me 209-II.
Then the RLM wanted a high-altitude variant of the 209-II. It sounds, though, that the 209H was really a continuation of the stretched Bf 109 program (P.1091a), and only used some systems architecture from the 209A.
The picture posted at the start of this thread is of the Me 209V14, or at least that it what it is labl[/size]ed in this document.
According to an issue of Le Fana de L'Aviation this variant was proposed to the RLM in November of 1939. If you look at the drawing you can see many differences from the earlier 209s, as well as simularites to the later 309 and 209 developments.
[size=small]
Source of this pic is Me-209 by David Myhra
Vladimir said:Hi, me 209 concept
blackkite said:The glory of Me209V1 record breaker had bad influence for a design of successor of BF109 fighter.
blackkite said:Oh ski?? We can see the radiator under the wing.
Wurger said:Dan, are you considering a third volume on the "Luftwaffe..." series?
Hood said:Dan,
Do you think the Germans might have been thinking about either transferring the development programme or the production programme to French industry before the Me 209 was cancelled?
Hood said:Another interesting piece of myth busting, not that 110% of the Luft 46 fanboy community will ever take the slightest bit of notice!
Does this mean that the often retold tale that the Me 155 was originally a carrier-based fighter before becoming a high-altitude fighter is also a misrepresentation?
newsdeskdan said:Hood said:Another interesting piece of myth busting, not that 110% of the Luft 46 fanboy community will ever take the slightest bit of notice!
Does this mean that the often retold tale that the Me 155 was originally a carrier-based fighter before becoming a high-altitude fighter is also a misrepresentation?
Seemingly the best account is given in Thomas H Hitchcock's Monogram Close-Up 20 Blohm & Voss 155 book(let). He begins with the May 20, 1942, meeting where Messerschmitt and Focke-Wulf pitched designs for a Spezial Höhenjäger. At this point the RLM unexpectedly pipes up with a request for a Spezial-Träger Jagdeinsitzer. The Messerschmitt guys then pluck a design out of their back pocket for something they've been working on since May 1 called the Bf 109 ST (Spezial-Trägerflugzeug). This is then "advanced in three variants", the A, B and C, powered by the DB 605, DB 628 and Jumo 213 respectively. Now the Bf 109 ST gets redesignated the Me 155.
This is all nice and neat and seemingly accurate but doesn't address the Me 409 thing at all.
sienar said:From some expired ebay auctions. Hope the data get published in full someday.
Wurger said:I see what you mean. The Me108 with a double Hirth engine is the most surprising to me. Unfortunatelly the text is trunked as well as incomplete.
richard B said:Do I read right in the last of the six images shown in your first post : "Me 327 , früher 263" ?
sgeorges4 said:anything regarding a zwilling variant of the V5 one?
http://www.wardrawings.be/WW2/Files/2-Airplanes/Axis/1-Germany/01-Fighters/Me-Bf109/Me-409.htm
sgeorges4 said:Is this doppel 209 is real or not?
sgeorges4 said:Is this doppel 209 is real or not?