My pleasure - here's individual scans of the artwork on the info card.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • Model 260 USCG artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USCG artwork.jpg
    275.8 KB · Views: 255
  • Model 260 USMC Assault Artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USMC Assault Artwork.jpg
    322.5 KB · Views: 700
  • Model 260 USN Fleet Defense artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USN Fleet Defense artwork.jpg
    262.6 KB · Views: 222
  • Model 260 USN COD artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USN COD artwork.jpg
    292.9 KB · Views: 243
A color profile of the anti-submarine warfare variant of the Model 260 illustrated by Italian artist Elio Torregino for Interavia in 1975.
 

Attachments

  • MDC 260 profile.jpg
    MDC 260 profile.jpg
    197.1 KB · Views: 220
Thanks a lot Paul for sharing these magnificent scans with us. "Type A" is an all-time favorite topic for me, and it's such a pleasure to get so many updates at once!
 
Another key piece of the Model 260 puzzle, McDonnell Report MDC A4551:

LIFT/CRUISE FAN V/STOL TECHNOLOGY AIRCRAFT DESIGN DEFINITION STUDY: VOLUME 1 - TECHNOLOGY FLIGHT VEHICLE DEFINITION

This 246-page document is filled to the brim with diagrams and information that should satisfy every Model 260 buff like me...

Two variants are described in this report:
  • Model 260-RTA-1, with Turbotip RTA propulsion system
  • Model 260-RTA-2, with Mechanical RTA propulsion system
I've attached a few key images, including the painfully reconstructed blueprints (low quality, but better than nothing).
 

Attachments

  • Model 260-RTA Cockpit Arrangement.gif
    Model 260-RTA Cockpit Arrangement.gif
    373.5 KB · Views: 159
  • Model 260-RTA-2 blueprint.gif
    Model 260-RTA-2 blueprint.gif
    682.6 KB · Views: 167
  • Mechanical RTA propulsion system.gif
    Mechanical RTA propulsion system.gif
    94.4 KB · Views: 115
  • Model 260-RTA-2, Mechanical RTA.gif
    Model 260-RTA-2, Mechanical RTA.gif
    22 KB · Views: 126
  • Model 260-RTA-1 blueprint.gif
    Model 260-RTA-1 blueprint.gif
    890.8 KB · Views: 722
  • Model 260-RTA-1 Turbotip RTA.gif
    Model 260-RTA-1 Turbotip RTA.gif
    89.5 KB · Views: 737
  • Turbotip RTA propulsion system.gif
    Turbotip RTA propulsion system.gif
    113 KB · Views: 775
  • Model 260-RTA-1 Propulsion System.gif
    Model 260-RTA-1 Propulsion System.gif
    63 KB · Views: 810
Stargazer2006 said:
Another key piece of the Model 260 puzzle, McDonnell Report MDC A4551:

LIFT/CRUISE FAN V/STOL TECHNOLOGY AIRCRAFT DESIGN DEFINITION STUDY: VOLUME 1 - TECHNOLOGY FLIGHT VEHICLE DEFINITION

This 246-page document is filled to the brim with diagrams and information that should satisfy every Model 260 buff like me...

Two variants are described in this report:
  • Model 260-RTA-1, with Turbotip RTA propulsion system
  • Model 260-RTA-2, with Mechanical RTA propulsion system
I've attached a few key images, including the painfully reconstructed blueprints (low quality, but better than nothing).

What a treasure! Thx a lot for posting the stitched blueprints - great work!
 
Isn´t it interesting that McAir didn´t consider a mechanical propulsion system in previous design studys?

MDC A3440/ VOLUME 1 - NAVY OPERATIONAL AIRCRAFT
MDC A3440/ VOLUME 2 - TECHNOLOGY AIRCRAFT

...both are entirely focused on the turbotip propulsion!

Further more the Hamilton Standard 62inch variable pitch Lift Fan for RTA-2 was originally designed for Boeing only! Extract from NASA Report CR-134988:

...NASA Ames study contracts were given to McDonnell Douglas, Rockwell-International and the Boeing Company starting in late 1974. Hamilton Standard was awarded contract NAS3-19414 by the NASA Lewis Research Center to support these studies with propulsion data for shaft driven, variable pitch lift and lift/cruise fans. Of the three airframe contractors, Boeing was the only one to study an aircraft having a shaft driven, variable pitch fan, lift/propulsion system. Therefore, the criteria for the lift fans discussed in this study were derived to meet the Boeing Company aircraft concepts...

Btw, VOUGHT had a very similar nose fan+vectored nozzle concept in its shortlist (pic attached).

Rgds, Michael
 

Attachments

  • xV-530 Candidate Design Concepts.jpg
    xV-530 Candidate Design Concepts.jpg
    224.9 KB · Views: 268
Interesting point...makes you wonder why. Maybe Boeing held patents for the shaft-drive? or more simply a case of not-invented here?
Personally I see tip drive as volume-hungry and heavy, but I'm sure we can find cons in the shaft-drive as well...
 
Here is one from my collection. There were 5 model variants in the series that I had using the same airframe. An ASW, AWAC's, All Weather, Transport and Attack versions. One model of 6 had interchangeable parts to make versions of the others. Scale was 1/40th I think, and Pac Min made a wonderful 1/10th scale that I would have killed for in the all weather version.
 

Attachments

  • MacAir.jpg
    MacAir.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 158
Nice model Allyson :)


Circle-5 posted this awesome pic of the modular model earlier in the topic:

index.php
 
Good Day All -

Yesterday we had a package of drawings donated to the Museum from a retired McDonnell Douglas engineer. One of the drawings was this one detailing the fuel system for the Model 260.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zModel 260-138 Fuel System Dec-12-73.jpg
    zModel 260-138 Fuel System Dec-12-73.jpg
    294.2 KB · Views: 165
Skyblazer said:
WOW!!!!!!!!!! Makes me wish even more there had been a production of the type, at least a couple of demonstrators... :-[

Imagine what they could have done with the VOD/Marine Assault variant re. Operation Eagle Claw.


index.php

index.php

(h/t Mark Nankivil)
 
From the AW-archive:
 

Attachments

  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    565.2 KB · Views: 99
  • 14.jpg
    14.jpg
    367.9 KB · Views: 89
  • 13.jpg
    13.jpg
    371.8 KB · Views: 84
  • 12.jpg
    12.jpg
    347.8 KB · Views: 83

Attachments

  • McDD260-10.jpg
    McDD260-10.jpg
    171 KB · Views: 49
  • McDD260-9.jpg
    McDD260-9.jpg
    167.4 KB · Views: 66
  • McDD260-8.jpg
    McDD260-8.jpg
    337.4 KB · Views: 66
  • McDD260-7.jpg
    McDD260-7.jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 60
  • McDD260-6.jpg
    McDD260-6.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 44
  • McDD260-5.jpg
    McDD260-5.jpg
    152.6 KB · Views: 44
  • McDD260-4.jpg
    McDD260-4.jpg
    175 KB · Views: 45
  • McDD260-3.jpg
    McDD260-3.jpg
    164.7 KB · Views: 43
  • McDD260-2.jpg
    McDD260-2.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 45
  • McDD260-1.jpg
    McDD260-1.jpg
    156.1 KB · Views: 44
And last few
 

Attachments

  • McDD260-14.jpg
    McDD260-14.jpg
    167.9 KB · Views: 289
  • McDD260-13.jpg
    McDD260-13.jpg
    156.1 KB · Views: 296
  • McDD260-12.jpg
    McDD260-12.jpg
    172.1 KB · Views: 312
  • McDD260-11.jpg
    McDD260-11.jpg
    150.7 KB · Views: 322
I've had this photo for some time, among a load of shots taken at (IIRC) NASA Ames. I think it was taken in the 1980s and I can see it's obviously a mock-up. But a mock-up of what?

img603.jpg
 
Whew!

I thought Ed Gein was branching out…
Of course, every florist is similar if you think about it..
 
From Aviation magazine 1979.
 

Attachments

  • 10.png
    10.png
    2 MB · Views: 25
  • 11.png
    11.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 30
  • 12.png
    12.png
    2 MB · Views: 39
From Aviation magazine 1979.
Hesham, the last page has my personal favorite of the Type A vstol proposals, the Vought V 530. It looks like the article has more on that aircraft, and perhaps more on other proposals as well. Have you posted the entire article to the VSTOL A thread? Or perhaps the sections with other proposals to their threads, when they have one?

Thanks for posting all these by the way. Where do you have access to all these journals?
 
Where do you have access to all these journals?

Hi Apparition13,

all those stuff are from Gallica,

Aviation magazine 1979.
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 29
Jus asking in passing - would that work for real, or would it be doomed like the Rockwell XVF-12 ? as complicated as a gas plant, and doesn't scale well from models.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom