My pleasure - here's individual scans of the artwork on the info card.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • Model 260 USCG artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USCG artwork.jpg
    275.8 KB · Views: 210
  • Model 260 USMC Assault Artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USMC Assault Artwork.jpg
    322.5 KB · Views: 675
  • Model 260 USN Fleet Defense artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USN Fleet Defense artwork.jpg
    262.6 KB · Views: 203
  • Model 260 USN COD artwork.jpg
    Model 260 USN COD artwork.jpg
    292.9 KB · Views: 226
A color profile of the anti-submarine warfare variant of the Model 260 illustrated by Italian artist Elio Torregino for Interavia in 1975.
 

Attachments

  • MDC 260 profile.jpg
    MDC 260 profile.jpg
    197.1 KB · Views: 203
Thanks a lot Paul for sharing these magnificent scans with us. "Type A" is an all-time favorite topic for me, and it's such a pleasure to get so many updates at once!
 
Another key piece of the Model 260 puzzle, McDonnell Report MDC A4551:

LIFT/CRUISE FAN V/STOL TECHNOLOGY AIRCRAFT DESIGN DEFINITION STUDY: VOLUME 1 - TECHNOLOGY FLIGHT VEHICLE DEFINITION

This 246-page document is filled to the brim with diagrams and information that should satisfy every Model 260 buff like me...

Two variants are described in this report:
  • Model 260-RTA-1, with Turbotip RTA propulsion system
  • Model 260-RTA-2, with Mechanical RTA propulsion system
I've attached a few key images, including the painfully reconstructed blueprints (low quality, but better than nothing).
 

Attachments

  • Model 260-RTA Cockpit Arrangement.gif
    Model 260-RTA Cockpit Arrangement.gif
    373.5 KB · Views: 148
  • Model 260-RTA-2 blueprint.gif
    Model 260-RTA-2 blueprint.gif
    682.6 KB · Views: 155
  • Mechanical RTA propulsion system.gif
    Mechanical RTA propulsion system.gif
    94.4 KB · Views: 106
  • Model 260-RTA-2, Mechanical RTA.gif
    Model 260-RTA-2, Mechanical RTA.gif
    22 KB · Views: 114
  • Model 260-RTA-1 blueprint.gif
    Model 260-RTA-1 blueprint.gif
    890.8 KB · Views: 713
  • Model 260-RTA-1 Turbotip RTA.gif
    Model 260-RTA-1 Turbotip RTA.gif
    89.5 KB · Views: 728
  • Turbotip RTA propulsion system.gif
    Turbotip RTA propulsion system.gif
    113 KB · Views: 767
  • Model 260-RTA-1 Propulsion System.gif
    Model 260-RTA-1 Propulsion System.gif
    63 KB · Views: 799
Stargazer2006 said:
Another key piece of the Model 260 puzzle, McDonnell Report MDC A4551:

LIFT/CRUISE FAN V/STOL TECHNOLOGY AIRCRAFT DESIGN DEFINITION STUDY: VOLUME 1 - TECHNOLOGY FLIGHT VEHICLE DEFINITION

This 246-page document is filled to the brim with diagrams and information that should satisfy every Model 260 buff like me...

Two variants are described in this report:
  • Model 260-RTA-1, with Turbotip RTA propulsion system
  • Model 260-RTA-2, with Mechanical RTA propulsion system
I've attached a few key images, including the painfully reconstructed blueprints (low quality, but better than nothing).

What a treasure! Thx a lot for posting the stitched blueprints - great work!
 
Isn´t it interesting that McAir didn´t consider a mechanical propulsion system in previous design studys?

MDC A3440/ VOLUME 1 - NAVY OPERATIONAL AIRCRAFT
MDC A3440/ VOLUME 2 - TECHNOLOGY AIRCRAFT

...both are entirely focused on the turbotip propulsion!

Further more the Hamilton Standard 62inch variable pitch Lift Fan for RTA-2 was originally designed for Boeing only! Extract from NASA Report CR-134988:

...NASA Ames study contracts were given to McDonnell Douglas, Rockwell-International and the Boeing Company starting in late 1974. Hamilton Standard was awarded contract NAS3-19414 by the NASA Lewis Research Center to support these studies with propulsion data for shaft driven, variable pitch lift and lift/cruise fans. Of the three airframe contractors, Boeing was the only one to study an aircraft having a shaft driven, variable pitch fan, lift/propulsion system. Therefore, the criteria for the lift fans discussed in this study were derived to meet the Boeing Company aircraft concepts...

Btw, VOUGHT had a very similar nose fan+vectored nozzle concept in its shortlist (pic attached).

Rgds, Michael
 

Attachments

  • xV-530 Candidate Design Concepts.jpg
    xV-530 Candidate Design Concepts.jpg
    224.9 KB · Views: 254
Interesting point...makes you wonder why. Maybe Boeing held patents for the shaft-drive? or more simply a case of not-invented here?
Personally I see tip drive as volume-hungry and heavy, but I'm sure we can find cons in the shaft-drive as well...
 
Here is one from my collection. There were 5 model variants in the series that I had using the same airframe. An ASW, AWAC's, All Weather, Transport and Attack versions. One model of 6 had interchangeable parts to make versions of the others. Scale was 1/40th I think, and Pac Min made a wonderful 1/10th scale that I would have killed for in the all weather version.
 

Attachments

  • MacAir.jpg
    MacAir.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 144
Nice model Allyson :)


Circle-5 posted this awesome pic of the modular model earlier in the topic:

index.php
 
Good Day All -

Yesterday we had a package of drawings donated to the Museum from a retired McDonnell Douglas engineer. One of the drawings was this one detailing the fuel system for the Model 260.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zModel 260-138 Fuel System Dec-12-73.jpg
    zModel 260-138 Fuel System Dec-12-73.jpg
    294.2 KB · Views: 153
Skyblazer said:
WOW!!!!!!!!!! Makes me wish even more there had been a production of the type, at least a couple of demonstrators... :-[

Imagine what they could have done with the VOD/Marine Assault variant re. Operation Eagle Claw.


index.php

index.php

(h/t Mark Nankivil)
 
From the AW-archive:
 

Attachments

  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    565.2 KB · Views: 89
  • 14.jpg
    14.jpg
    367.9 KB · Views: 79
  • 13.jpg
    13.jpg
    371.8 KB · Views: 78
  • 12.jpg
    12.jpg
    347.8 KB · Views: 76

Attachments

  • McDD260-10.jpg
    McDD260-10.jpg
    171 KB · Views: 41
  • McDD260-9.jpg
    McDD260-9.jpg
    167.4 KB · Views: 55
  • McDD260-8.jpg
    McDD260-8.jpg
    337.4 KB · Views: 58
  • McDD260-7.jpg
    McDD260-7.jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 52
  • McDD260-6.jpg
    McDD260-6.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 39
  • McDD260-5.jpg
    McDD260-5.jpg
    152.6 KB · Views: 39
  • McDD260-4.jpg
    McDD260-4.jpg
    175 KB · Views: 40
  • McDD260-3.jpg
    McDD260-3.jpg
    164.7 KB · Views: 37
  • McDD260-2.jpg
    McDD260-2.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 39
  • McDD260-1.jpg
    McDD260-1.jpg
    156.1 KB · Views: 38
And last few
 

Attachments

  • McDD260-14.jpg
    McDD260-14.jpg
    167.9 KB · Views: 282
  • McDD260-13.jpg
    McDD260-13.jpg
    156.1 KB · Views: 290
  • McDD260-12.jpg
    McDD260-12.jpg
    172.1 KB · Views: 306
  • McDD260-11.jpg
    McDD260-11.jpg
    150.7 KB · Views: 313
I've had this photo for some time, among a load of shots taken at (IIRC) NASA Ames. I think it was taken in the 1980s and I can see it's obviously a mock-up. But a mock-up of what?

img603.jpg
 
Whew!

I thought Ed Gein was branching out…
Of course, every florist is similar if you think about it..
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom