KJ_Lesnick
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 13 February 2008
- Messages
- 1,042
- Reaction score
- 103
Was the F-15U or F-15U+ faster, slower, or the same as the regular F-15?
Kendra
Kendra
Sundog said:I would have to say it's from the 80's, because that's when I was reading Flight alot. That's an image I clipped out, I didn't save the magazine, so I can't be precise on the date.
overscan said:F-15 Wild Weasel project and a pic of the demonstrator.
Source:
Peter E Davies & Tony Thornborough, F-15 Eagle (Crowood, 2001)
Deino said:Interesting, esp. the antenna (?) between the engines and under the nose !
Deino
overscan said:Naval F-15 with Phoenix, same source. Note wing fold, leading edge flaps.
KJ_Lesnick said:I would assume the Naval F-15 design is fitted with an AWG-9 to guide the AIM-54's?
KJ_Lesnick said:Those thrust-vectoring F-15 designs look pretty cool. Why were they cancelled exactly?
KJ Lesnick
BTW: I take it the 25 mm caseless GAU-7 ammo was cancelled due to problems with the ammunition?
F-14D said:Yes, which was one of the reasons its development would be so expensive.
KJ_Lesnick said:F-14D said:Yes, which was one of the reasons its development would be so expensive.
Was there any difference in the radome diameter?
KJ
overscan said:Some models of different warloads for future F-15 variants dating back to the 1970s.
KJ_Lesnick said:Was there any difference in the radar capabilities of the F-15N vs the F-14A?
KJ Lesnick
The large-scale model was configured to represent a typical high-speed aircraft developed in a general study by the NASA on
advanced high-speed fighter concepts.
XP67_Moonbat said:Responsive Air Launch
Using F-15 Global Strike Eagle
Timothy T. Chen, Preston W. Ferguson,
David A. Deamer, and John Hensley
The Boeing Company
4th Responsive Space Conference
April 24–27, 2006
Los Angeles, CA
http://www.responsivespace.com/Papers/RS4%5CPapers%5CRS4_2001P_Chen.pdf