Grey Havoc said:
A couple of GRA (more directly so in the latter) related papers, from 2000 and 2006 respectively:
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a413922.pdf
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a458618.pdf
Great Find Grey. Thought the below from the conclusion of the 2006 was worth specifics.
"This study has found that in the new world of precision munitions, the cost of
maintaining foreign bases needed to support air operation of the current, relatively short-range
USAF is the dominant cost element, consuming up to 50-60% of the total funds. This is a very
significant change from earlier wars, such as Vietnam, where aircraft operations and support
costs dominated. Base costs were not a major element. This stems from spreading a decreased
number of operations (due to precision) over a relatively fixed number of foreign base structures.
Since base costs are not called out explicitly in DoD budgets (indeed are difficult to deduce), the
magnitude of this change has been previously unrecognized.
This gives new impetus to the concept of global range aircraft. In addition to providing
flexibility and a reduction on foreign base dependence, such an aircraft could also significantly
reduce the cost of fighting a modern air war. ..."