Attachments

  • 1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9 (3).jpg
    1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9 (3).jpg
    134.6 KB · Views: 80
  • 1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9 (2).jpg
    1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9 (2).jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 75
  • 1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9 (1).jpg
    1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9 (1).jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 82
  • 1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9.jpg
    1_5d5a9713bb5cb658e4137a9029078bc9.jpg
    132.9 KB · Views: 85

Attachments

  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (1).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (1).jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 79
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (2).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (2).jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 70
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (3).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (3).jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 74
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (5).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (5).jpg
    26 KB · Views: 72
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (4).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (4).jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 71
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (6).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (6).jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 68
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (7).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (7).jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 63
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (8).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (8).jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 69
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (9).jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9 (9).jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 76
  • 1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9.jpg
    1_6e9ef5313cc5bd04d795596fe57e4ff9.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 82
This could have potentially beat the X-35 but the separate lift-plus-engine was the killer. The MDD gas driven lift fan would have also had performance issues as well. This would have been a excellent USAF and USN version though.
 
This could have potentially beat the X-35 but the separate lift-plus-engine was the killer. The MDD gas driven lift fan would have also had performance issues as well. This would have been a excellent USAF and USN version though.
I really think that the JSF should have stuck to a two-service airframe, with the Marines getting a unique design that may not even share parts with the JSF.

Because seriously, what mission requires vertical takeoff and supersonic flight, and how often does that mission come up?
 
My imaginary USAF was filled with these and F-23s. What a great looking airplane.
Since fantasy is mentioned, how bout including Lockheed swing wing LRS-B for theater bomber role replacing the F-15E and B-1B. Navy gets ASF-14 with additional frontal RCS reduction for fleet defense and quarter back/bomb truck behind supporting A/F-X. Marines get the Lockheed canard ASTOVL.
I really think that the JSF should have stuck to a two-service airframe, with the Marines getting a unique design that may not even share parts with the JSF.

Because seriously, what mission requires vertical takeoff and supersonic flight, and how often does that mission come up?
Especially now that Marines basically playing Sea Rangers. A smaller STOVL UCAV would fit the role better. I just don't buy the island hopping f-35B they touting. No one wants to see an intact f-35B in Chinese parade.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom