yes a great findRLBH said:This thread seems like the best place for this:
A New Tank Armament System, Watervliet Arsenal, March 1959
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/501680.pdf
The report describes the origin of the 152mm gun/launcher, and the tanks that carried it. Interestingly, it seems that the original logic wasn't the Shillelagh missile - rather, it was to design a lightweight gun optimised for HEAT projectiles, rather than a high-velocity, high-pressure gun for KE rounds. This resulted in a 140mm gun, subsequently enlarged to 152mm calibre to accommodate guided missiles and a more effective HE shell.
A demonstration fit of the 152mm gun in the turret of a T95 tank is proposed, not that of the eventual M60A2 but with some similarities, as is an MBT optimised for the 152mm gun and an airborne assault vehicle, both very obvious precursors to the MBT-70 and M551. All three tanks had bustle ammunition storage with blow-out panels, quite innovative for the time, and the AAV also has a gas turbine engine.
Nice work JAZZ!Re: MBT 70 anti-aircraft version
Once you get into the Engineer CE, Bridge AVLB and Recovery ARV versions the driving position would no longer be in such turret, they would adopt more conventional approaches which would be cheaper than modifying a MBT turret.
The tri-axial stabalisation turret looks very interesting, a photo in Rolf Hilmes 'Main Battle Tanks' developments in design since 1945 shows an experimental turret on a leopard 1 chasis (albeit modified) page 49.
Just to round off an unofficial - what-if drawing of a MBT-70 chasis with a Matador SPAAG turret.
Here are a number of photos, I took last year in the Panzermuseum Münster (Tank Museum Munster):
https://drive.google.com/open?id=10jSurbMB84AthxrF2ZsMGFaDSpS7nfn2
Although I must say I've always had the thought that an MBT chassis seems a lot of tank = $$$$ for 30mm SPAAG IMO
The hell is that thing... antena of some sort?CEV XM745 engineer tank
It's too thin for that. Maybe it's crane, very long and thin crane... pic is blurred and it do look like hook is hanging from it in upper position.
What a peculiar concept.
What a peculiar concept.
A bit. I think the lower half of the scoop is what they call a "thumb" -- basically a clamp to allow the excavator scoop to also be used to lift and grab obstacles or debris.
I also suspect that the design of that excavator arm would have had to change to get to production. You need a bend in there somewhere for leverage if you want to lift anything weighty.
Hello dear tank friends! I have something to show again! This is the first draft of the Kampfpanzer 70! Unfortunately a few parts are missing, but I improvised a little to show what the vehicle actually looks like! Does anyone have any pictures ???
Gruss aus Frielendorf - Germany - Johannes
I'd suggest for the 20mm AA gun, rather than the driver. As there appears to be no hull driving position, I think he would need to be located under one of the turret cupolas.The question that is still open is this hole
How did you manage to find these incredibly rare models?All details suggest that it is 1963-64 Porshe model, it had 2 variants -