Martin Marietta MGM-134A Midgetman Small Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (SICBM)

...
 

Attachments

  • f1e6db4ba8c478405a4e8f972b56a73c993d7a34.jpeg
    f1e6db4ba8c478405a4e8f972b56a73c993d7a34.jpeg
    30.6 KB · Views: 149
  • gte355a (1).jpg
    gte355a (1).jpg
    131.3 KB · Views: 82
  • gte355 (1).jpg
    gte355 (1).jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 85
  • Hard Mobile Launcher Test Vehicle Caterpillar drive System by Martin Marietta 1987 USA (1).jpg
    Hard Mobile Launcher Test Vehicle Caterpillar drive System by Martin Marietta 1987 USA (1).jpg
    100.6 KB · Views: 148
Aviation Week, March 5, 1984
"Parallel Programs Advance Small Icbm"
Page: 14
Concept Art:
-Boeing Goodyear
"wheeled truck - trailer HML concept design"
-Martin Marietta
"tracked prime mover - trailer HML concept design"
-Bell Textron
"wheeled/air cushion HML CACX concept design"
-General Dynamics
"10? wheeled truck HML concept design"


Aviation Week, January 23, 1984
"USAF Awards Initial Contracts For Small ICBM Missile Project"
Page: 23
Concept Art:
-prelimilary USAF HML drawing


Small Single-Warhead Intercontinental
Ballistic Missiles
Jonathan Medalia
1983
Page: 38
https://books.google.com
-artist's conception of hardened transport erector launcher
 
AvWeek 25 Mar 1985 ( colour ad )

AvWeek 05 Mar 1984 ( gallery of contenders ). Clockwise:
  • Boeing / Goodyear
  • Martin-Marietta
  • Bell CACX
  • GD
 

Attachments

  • AvWeek_19850325_034.JPEG
    AvWeek_19850325_034.JPEG
    442.5 KB · Views: 153
  • AvWeek_19840305_Midgetman_TELS.png
    AvWeek_19840305_Midgetman_TELS.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 152
Last edited:
More pictures showing a Convair mobile ICBM launcher prototype (proof of concept) were uploaded at SDASM flickr archives today.
Please notice, IMHO it is probably just a proof of concept, since the outer shell is made out of plywood.
Here an appetiser.
View: https://flic.kr/p/2qLcHt3
 
Has anyone ever heard the why behind the decision to scrap the Midgetman HML at Wright-Patterson? I recall seeing the RFP for that and they required that it be chopped into wee small pieces by the bidder. It would have been nice to be able to get out there and document more of it, for example what the crew firing ports looked like from the inside.

Was it an attempt to keep foreign parties from seeing how to build a survivable TEL for their own programs? If so, why is the other test article still around?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom