- Joined
- 26 May 2006
- Messages
- 33,552
- Reaction score
- 13,648
Vintage RC Helicopters - RC helicopters 1989
Vintage RC Helicopters - RC helicopters 1989www.vrhc.co.uk
It was mentioned in replies # 28 & 34.
Vintage RC Helicopters - RC helicopters 1989
Vintage RC Helicopters - RC helicopters 1989www.vrhc.co.uk
And how did it *fly*? What improvements in performance were gained by all the added bulbous protrusions and weight?Vintage RC Helicopters - RC helicopters 1989
Vintage RC Helicopters - RC helicopters 1989www.vrhc.co.uk
A little off topic, but he designed my favorite film SLR: Canon T90. Bought it when it first came out and I still use it.Might be my age, but I associate Colani's designs with the kind of classic magazines that Tommy Saxondale collects.
Now who's showing their age!A little off topic, but he designed my favorite film SLR: Canon T90. Bought it when it first came out and I still use it.Might be my age, but I associate Colani's designs with the kind of classic magazines that Tommy Saxondale collects.
I admit it! I’m old!Now who's showing their age!A little off topic, but he designed my favorite film SLR: Canon T90. Bought it when it first came out and I still use it.Might be my age, but I associate Colani's designs with the kind of classic magazines that Tommy Saxondale collects.
Mine died several years ago, but I still keep it.A little off topic, but he designed my favorite film SLR: Canon T90. Bought it when it first came out and I still use it.Might be my age, but I associate Colani's designs with the kind of classic magazines that Tommy Saxondale collects.
Who, pray tell, did he ever scam?As pointed out by others, Colani's aircraft are nothing more than wistful fantasy born of utter ignorance. He would steal some striking image and buzzwords from the latest research, embody it in a fantasy machine and wrap it around with aerodynamic utter BS. He had a wonderful eye and as often as not the end result was stunningly original and beautiful, the best investor bait a charlatan could possibly wish for. No doubt he picked up his line in BS while at college and Douglas, but he certainly didn't pick up any aeronautical talent. I don't know what he studied at college or for how long, but at Douglas he ended up as head of the New Materials division, not exactly an aerodynamic Bauhaus.
But what puzzles me most about all this F&SF book cover art was that serious journals like Flight would report cheerfully on his latest scam, repeating his patently absurd claims in all seriousness, alongside a glamour photograph of the mock-up, or perhaps even of a lash-up rig he had "tested". The stuff he got away with, with a straight face! I'd guess that every column inch they published would have netted him another million dollars' beer money.
I just wish Hollywood had kidnapped him, he would have come to own the SF Silver Screen! Instead, he wobbled around being a reasonably successful designer in other, less technically challenging fields, until he finally passed away only a few years ago, in 2019.
Two cases in point were the supersonic push-pull propeller record-breaker and the lifting-body airliner. These were so obviously untenable, yet straight-faced write-ups in journals like Flight helped persuade investors to believe his absurd claims and hand over their cash. You know, convoluted propellers that would break under centrifugal loads long before they got supersonic, grossly exaggerated area ruling in slightly the wrong place, a lifting-body expected to be aerodynamically efficient, that sort of elementary nonsense. There is not, and can never be, authoritative support for such nonsense; there is nothing to refute. I call those scams, you may choose to wrap platitudes round him.Who, pray tell, did he ever scam?