Shake and bake.

1745400606928.png

 
Last edited:
I personally hate when aerospace managers drawn comparisons with automotive as if they were not already in the most advanced industry. Bring back the bad vib from working with the most damaging professionals I had to interact with.
If LM now is proud to sell Ferrari, perhaps DoD would pin that to them regarding their mission availability (bring me back my Jeep or my Hummer!).
 
Despite the awesomeness of this Turbo Lightning, I fear LM proposal would face the same difficulties met by the Super Starfighter in the 60's: larger program in the US and national conflicting priorities among allies (GCAP, FCAS, Boramae...).
But who knows, maybe the Saudi?
 
The obvious risk being that "Ferrari variant" going the way of the proverbial Ship of Theseus... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus Starting from "new wings and no tails" and "oh, wait, adaptative engine too".

Until only the (engine) bell is similar, bwaha ha ha.

By the way, how much commonality left between the three F-35 variants ? and why would a fourth variant do any better at "cost savings through commonality" ?

Also it's Lockheed we are talking about, more on the greedy side than benevolent...
 
Last edited:
I don’t think anyone is interested in the concept. USAF already shot down the adaptive engine. Plus just getting the Blk 4 avionics working has been a huge task. I cannot see anyone buying a new version with airframe changes, at least not unless LM pays for development.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom