Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor

Attachments

  • 'Air+control+can+be+established+by+superiority+in+numbers,+by+better+employment,+by+better+equ...jpg
    'Air+control+can+be+established+by+superiority+in+numbers,+by+better+employment,+by+better+equ...jpg
    187.2 KB · Views: 120
  • 'Air+control+can+be+established+by+superiority+in+numbers,+by+better+employment,+by+better+equ...jpg
    'Air+control+can+be+established+by+superiority+in+numbers,+by+better+employment,+by+better+equ...jpg
    157.3 KB · Views: 98
  • 'Air+control+can+be+established+by+superiority+in+numbers,+by+better+employment,+by+better+equ...jpg
    'Air+control+can+be+established+by+superiority+in+numbers,+by+better+employment,+by+better+equ...jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 142
Defense Updates has just put out this interesting video concerning the F-22 priority in regards to as potential conflict (Re: War) with the PRC:


About a year ago, the US Air Force was asking to cut a significant number of early model F-22s from its 183-Raptor inventory.
Click to expand...
In 2023, the US Air Force lodged a plea to retire its fleet of 32 F-22 Raptor Block 20 units currently in operation. Furthermore, the USAF requested for the budget originally allocated for upgrading these planes to be rerouted into the development of the sixth-generation combat aircraft also referred to as the Next Generation Air Dominance [NGAD].
Click to expand...
This proposal encountered a roadblock in Congress when discussed in the framework of the FY23 National Defense Authorization Act, a document that was published in December 2023.
Click to expand...
But the US Air Force has now designated the Raptor as its “highest priority”.
Click to expand...
Referring to the military competition with China at a McAleese Defense Programs conference in Washington DC, US Air Force acquisition chief, Andrew Hunter, said, “F-22 is a critical capability. So what’s my highest priority in the near term for that great power competition? I’d probably put F-22 at the top.”
Click to expand...
Hunter's statements indicate the possibility of retaining and upgrading an undisclosed quantity of the older F-22s manufactured by Lockheed Martin during the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Click to expand...
US Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin offered a comment on upgrading older F-22s, saying “we’re looking to be able to take those that are the most combat-capable, keep them in the fight, and then leverage some of the resources for those that are going to be cost prohibitive and time prohibitive.”
Click to expand...
In this video, Defense Updates analyzes why the F-22 is still considered the “highest priority” in a potential conflict with China?
Click to expand...
#defenseupdates #F22 #usairforce
Click to expand...
Chapters:
Click to expand...
00:11 INTRODUCTION
Click to expand...
02:59 EXCELLENT FLIGHT DYNAMICS
Click to expand...
04:19 SUPER SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
Click to expand...
06:27 GENUINE STEALTH PROFILE
Click to expand...
 
Interesting, is there any idea what is in the pods yet?
I wish the F-22 could have gotten this level of interest in expanding its capabilities back when we were still producing them.
 
Colonial-Marine said:
Interesting, is there any idea what is in the pods yet?
I wish the F-22 could have gotten this level of interest in expanding its capabilities back when we were still producing them.
Click to expand...
It’s a combination of EW and EO/IRST. Had F-22 production continued, the IRST would likely have been internal. Granted, you minimize the impact if you can tailor the shaping as a whole and dump most of the additional returns into aspects where there are already RCS spikes, but it’s still not as ideal as an internal sensor which is likely too expensive at this point to retrofit. Money and budget matters.

The USAF is still committed to upgrading the F-22 because it’s the most capable air superiority platform until NGAD’s crewed fighter component becomes operational, tentatively slated to be some time in the next decade.
 
I have real difficulty in seeing those inboard pods as fuel tanks. I can’t see how the very limited amount of fuel they could contain, cancelling out the drag, to give a net gain.

As sensors, yes. Ew weapons, lasers, maybe. Fuel, yanks have been using conformal tanks for 20+ years, now they are sticking 500 litre tanks under the wing, a la ww2 typhoon, I don’t think so.
 
Fluff said:
US gallon? Roughly 1000 litres, tornado had 1500 litres as standard, and 2250x 2 as long range.

I still can’t see it as viable. As fuel….
Click to expand...

Look at the size of the F-22's current drop-tanks, they are BIG.
 
Fluff said:
I have real difficulty in seeing those inboard pods as fuel tanks. I can’t see how the very limited amount of fuel they could contain, cancelling out the drag, to give a net gain.
Click to expand...

The tanks have been designed to have very low drag. The F-22 can fly supersonically with them.

Fluff said:
Fuel, yanks have been using conformal tanks for 20+ years, now they are sticking 500 litre tanks under the wing, a la ww2 typhoon, I don’t think so.
Click to expand...

Conformal tanks are the exception rather than the rule. External drop tanks are much more common.
Conformal tanks would not work on the F-22 for a number of reasons.
 
quellish said:
The tanks have been designed to have very low drag. The F-22 can fly supersonically with them.
Click to expand...
Not sure ofc, but i think those ones are big subsonic tanks.
Big and not overly streamlined, like supersonic tanks tend to look.

And, frankly speaking, subsonic range/loiter time extender does make sense for Pacific.
 
Ainen said:
Not sure ofc, but i think those ones are big subsonic tanks.
Big and not overly streamlined, like supersonic tanks tend to look.

And, frankly speaking, subsonic range/loiter time extender does make sense for Pacific.
Click to expand...

There is a reason they are called Low Drag Tank and Pylon.
 
quellish said:
There is a reason they are called Low Drag Tank and Pylon.
Click to expand...
Don't remember high drag tanks and pylons, so this line of reasoning is not convincing.

Most likely cause of such name is simply outgrowth of some work to optimize airflows.

But unless specifically declared to be such, this just isn't how supersonic tanks tend to be like.
 
Ainen said:
Don't remember high drag tanks and pylons, so this line of reasoning is not convincing.

Most likely cause of such name is simply outgrowth of some work to optimize airflows.

But unless specifically declared to be such, this just isn't how supersonic tanks tend to be like.
Click to expand...

Their priorities were (hypothetically):
1. Drag
2. Capacity
3. Signature

The tanks are optimized for transonic and supersonic drag, to allow the aircraft to supercruise with minimal penalty. The tanks are designed specifically for the F-22 - both signature and aerodynamics. Using the same tanks on an F-35 or F-16 would see no or negative benefit. Most other external tanks are not optimized for a specific aircraft.

Other external tanks - like those used on the F-16 and F-15 - ARE high drag tanks and pylons. They are not optimized to reduce their impact on performance other than range. The standard external tanks and pylons used on the F-22 significantly impact performance. They are not optimized for the F-22 mission.
 
donnage99 said:
Also they need to drop them when necessary correct? Alot of research went into dropping and return f-22 to its clean original RCS signature.

A conformal fuel tank wouldn't work.
Click to expand...

When they pop off the LDTP the pylon comes off too, resulting in a "clean" configuration both in terms of signature and drag.
 
quellish said:
When they pop off the LDTP the pylon comes off too, resulting in a "clean" configuration both in terms of signature and drag.
Click to expand...

There'd need to be some sort of spring-loaded flap to mask the exposed pylon connections on the the wings undersides to prevent degradation of the F-22's radar-signature.
 
NMaude said:
There'd need to be some sort of spring-loaded flap to mask the exposed pylon connections on the the wings undersides to prevent degradation of the F-22's radar-signature.
Click to expand...

They do something to minimize the signature impact or dropping the pylon but I do not yet know what is or if it requires aircraft to be modified.
 
Are drop tanks recoverable and reusable after being dropped? I would think a parachute system and/or small wing kit could enable you to recover and reuse. Not sure if the weight and capacity penalty would be worth it at all.

I've always wondered about the possibility of making pylons that fold up into the wing structure after releasing ordinance as well to return to a clean configuration. I imagine that's something that's been looked at as well but offers little upside relative to capability gained.
 
Last edited:
Ainen said:
Don't remember high drag tanks and pylons, so this line of reasoning is not convincing.

Most likely cause of such name is simply outgrowth of some work to optimize airflows.

But unless specifically declared to be such, this just isn't how supersonic tanks tend to be like.
Click to expand...


quellish said:
Their priorities were (hypothetically):
1. Drag
2. Capacity
3. Signature

The tanks are optimized for transonic and supersonic drag, to allow the aircraft to supercruise with minimal penalty. The tanks are designed specifically for the F-22 - both signature and aerodynamics. Using the same tanks on an F-35 or F-16 would see no or negative benefit. Most other external tanks are not optimized for a specific aircraft.

Other external tanks - like those used on the F-16 and F-15 - ARE high drag tanks and pylons. They are not optimized to reduce their impact on performance other than range. The standard external tanks and pylons used on the F-22 significantly impact performance. They are not optimized for the F-22 mission.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • F22_LDPT.jpg
    F22_LDPT.jpg
    312.2 KB · Views: 97
Sandboxx has just uploaded this video concerning the upcoming $16 billion Raptor upgrade:


Let's talk about what's gone into this massive $16.2 billion overhaul of the world's most capable air superiority fighter that's been underway since 2018 — including what new capabilities the upgraded Raptor will bring to bear, and what all of this means for the forthcoming Next Generation Air Dominance fighter slated to replace the Raptor by the close of this decade.
Click to expand...
 
Something that slipped under the radar but have pretty important implications for future developments is that since 2021, the F-22's CIPs have been upgraded with Curtiss-Wright COTS modular open systems architecture (MOSA) processor modules. This is coupled with a Kubernetes-based orchestration system, and enabled the F-22 to be the first aircraft to use containerized third-party software applications. It's always been in the plans but we're finally seeing the fruits of the effort. It's a way to interface new capabilities more quickly with the legacy integrated avionics. I believe full Link-16 capability is also close, pending FAA lifting transmission restrictions.

A review of recent budget requests and DOT&E reports show that F-22's software development now heavily leans into contemporary practices such as Agile. OFP updates are now rolled out as annual capability releases, and this when coupled with rapid prototyping and rapid fielding being Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA), has allowed more frequent and faster releases of added capabilities. I do think there may be some risks as far as latency and future stability and regression testing, but we'll see how it progresses and if it can allow the jet to finally shake off its reputation of being difficult to upgrade.

militaryembedded.com

COTS open-architecture modules from Curtiss-Wright will upgrade F-22 avionics, mission-processing systems - Military Embedded Systems

DAVIDSON, N.C. Curtiss-Wright Corp. announced that it has won a contract with Lockheed Martin Aeronautics (a Lockheed Martin company headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas) to supply its rugged commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor module technology to upgrade the U.S. Air Force's F-22 Raptor...
militaryembedded.com militaryembedded.com
 
Last edited:
sferrin said:
Curtis-Wright?
Click to expand...

It's definitely not Curtis Wright;):D, however Curtiss-Wright no longer makes aircraft but:

Today, it no longer makes aircraft but makes many related components, particularly actuators, aircraft controls, valves, and surface-treatment services. It supplies the commercial, industrial, defense, and energy markets. It makes parts for commercial and naval nuclear power systems, industrial vehicles, and oil- and gas-related machinery.
Click to expand...
 
icyplanetnhc (Steve) said:
If you want another Raptor-related throwback to the old days, the F119's DEEC is supplied by Hamilton Standard.
Click to expand...
Actually Hamilton Sundstrand, after another corporate merger. Sundstrand built the Main Fuel Pump for the F119 before the merger. All part of Raytheon Technologies Corp (RTX) , along with P&W and others.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom