Arjen said:Images merged with GIMP.
Suspect that there was a background painting done, with variations of the aircraft put in on top of the painting.
I was able to get it from the seller at a decent price after it did not sell for asking. I'll post pictures after I receive it and fix the boo-boos.There's a model of the turboprop variant for sale on Ebay right now. First I've seen.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1965-LOCKHEED-CL-945-Factory-Model-COMPOSITE-AIRCRAFT-RETRACTED-ROTOR-CONCEPT/393037803397?hash=item5b82e0ef85:g:EdcAAOSwOc5fxUoB&LH_ItemCondition=3000
Different aircraft and sorta kinda the same if you squint real hard......Its not uncommon in aviation concept art for the earlier oil painting to be overpainted in a modified configuration, rather than have the artist paint an entirely new picture.
I'll be doing a full video on this concept very shortly so watch this space. I'll update this post when its done. Thanks TIM!
I dunno, there's limits on how big a wing and fuselage you can have blocking airflow from the rotor. And I just don't trust the automatic fold/stow setups.I was thinking the other day how viable these concepts could be today. With digital fly by wire/light and computing power the controlability of the aircraft should not be overly difficult. With composite materials weight (and thus cost) can be reduced as well. Mechanical reliability would likely be the biggest challenge, but thanks to better understanding of aero and using wing mounted thrust as counter-tourque, the dynamic components of a design like this could be ... simplified (sorta).