F-14"Tomcat":Are you kidding?Imagine if they tried landing their Tomcats on those ships... back to square one, 50 years later.
More seriously: helicopters + drones + commandos ships ? that's their goal ? One thing is sure: if they ever go into a shooting match with Israel or (god forbid) US Navy, those ships will last aproximately one minute and counting...
I'm curious as to how they're gonna recover the UCAVs
Wouldn't that wear down the airframes quicker? I guess wire traps would be to complex for themNet based system, perhaps?
As long as you don't let the oil catch on fire, you're pretty good. And oil tankers fill their tanks with cooled flue gasses (diesel exhaust) to inert them.Tankers full of oil did prove surprising resistant to anti ship missiles back in the 80s (empty ones no so much, without the oil the hulls filled with water way to fast)
Thought that was a container ship, but yes many modern cargo ships have lots of "acceptably-flat-for-emergencies" areas on the deck that make decent improv flight decks.Also I seem to remember a story about a harrier landing on a tanker.
Look post #56Latest pic
On a container carrier actually.Tankers full of oil did prove surprising resistant to anti ship missiles back in the 80s (empty ones no so much, without the oil the hulls filled with water way to fast)
Also I seem to remember a story about a harrier landing on a tanker.
Oh, FFS. The ski jump is on a different angle than the landing line!New photo :
View attachment 737931
That could simply be an illusion caused by the ramp angle and camera perspective.Oh, FFS. The ski jump is on a different angle than the landing line!
That could simply be an illusion caused by the ramp angle and camera perspective.
Ski ramps often give that illusion.
That's a shot from directly overhead.That could simply be an illusion caused by the ramp angle and camera perspective.
Ski ramps often give that illusion.
Someone in the PR department desperate for a photo to illustrate a new reported capability without spilling any beans?