How to become a better researcher

There is a book I'd like to suggest called "The Lifetime Learner's Guide to Reading and Learning" by Gary Hoover, a Texan who bought an old 32 room clinic and filled it with books--each room it's own topic.

I don't know if he is still around--last I saw him he was on C-SPAN, talking about how most of what he has are older books not likely to have ever been scanned.

If Elon hasn't put any money towards it, Mr. Hoover may need a heir of sorts--a curator to spend a lifetime of scanning his finds before the inevitable tornado/hurricane/purge destroys them.

Different takes on research and learning
 
Last edited:
I would add treat OCR scanned documents with caution. A certain forum had a long discussion regarding a ship’s armour, and it had been running for some time before someone queried the value; the figure in question was 12.172 inches. A foot of armour specified to a thousandth of an inch?
In the 40s and 50s the typists often used a full stop to indicate a fraction: 12.1/2” which was miss-read by the OCR software.

SRJ
 
Last edited:
I have worked on two books whose production I hoped could be eased by use of OCR. One had to be gone though with search and replace (Bf lOg, Fw lgO etc etc) so many times I might as well have retyped the manuscript and the second (manuscript produced on late 1980s dot-matrix printout on IZAL that had faded away) I did retype the whole thing.

I won't be doing this type of work again.

Chris
 
OCR has it's place provided you are aware of it's limitations. Useful for cut-and-paste into Google translate, for example, and also to enable a reasonably quick search of documents if the images are converted to searchable pdf . However it is no substitute for retyping as doing that at least ensures that you have actually read the document thoroughly.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom