Forest Green
ACCESS: Above Top Secret
- Joined
- 11 June 2019
- Messages
- 8,965
- Reaction score
- 15,764
Considering that there is still a competition between NG and Lockheed for NGI, you are unlikely to get any information on the specifics of either the rocket motors or stack for either competitor until after the downselect happens.Are there any links or other such information on these NG rocket-motors and the NGI booster stack?
you are unlikely to get any information on the specifics of either the rocket motors or stack for either competitor until after the downselect happens.
Unless they've gone mobile, which I certainly wouldn't object to.Since this will be a replacement for the GBI missile I assume the NGI missile Will have the same exterior dimensions so that it can fit into the GBI launch silos?
I expect it to use the same silos, though isn't GBI hot launched so the silo is a lot bigger than the missile itself?Since this will be a replacement for the GBI missile I assume the NGI missile Will have the same exterior dimensions so that it can fit into the GBI launch silos?
They've been using them in missiles since the 60s.Still getting used to composite SRM stages becoming mainstream.
The FORGE capability architecture is crucial in providing OPIR (Overhead Persistent Infrared) data to operational warfighters and underpins the U.S. Space Force's shift towards a resilient missile warning, tracking, and defense architecture.
I'm sure the US has some about-to-expire Tridents and Minutemen available to use... Though I think the MM are kinda hard on their silo with the hot launch.Build an ICBM target how about an ICBM.![]()
The new target vehicle will use an SR119 Peacekeeper motor.I'm sure the US has some about-to-expire Tridents and Minutemen available to use... Though I think the MM are kinda hard on their silo with the hot launch.
@thustwr.bsky.social said:Seems like MDA environmental assessment report on NGI deployment/testing at Vandenberg and Fort Greely is out: www.mda.mil/system/NGI/ deeper look at current maximum assessments for the system include 12 KVs per missile (vs 1 on GBI), and a much taller/heavier design (at minimum).
Class 1.3? comparable to smokeless powder?!?![]()
Zach (@thrustwr.bsky.social)
Seems like MDA environmental assessment report on NGI deployment/testing at Vandenberg and Fort Greely is out: www.mda.mil/system/NGI/ deeper look at current maximum assessments for the system include 12 KVs per missile (vs 1 on GBI), and a much taller/heavier design (at minimum).bsky.app
View attachment 760842
View attachment 760843
View attachment 760844
Full Environment Assessment can be found at the following link: https://www.mda.mil/system/NGI/
The document in question is too large to upload here.
Class 1.3? comparable to smokeless powder?!?
![]()
Zach (@thrustwr.bsky.social)
Seems like MDA environmental assessment report on NGI deployment/testing at Vandenberg and Fort Greely is out: www.mda.mil/system/NGI/ deeper look at current maximum assessments for the system include 12 KVs per missile (vs 1 on GBI), and a much taller/heavier design (at minimum).bsky.app
Full Environment Assessment can be found at the following link: https://www.mda.mil/system/NGI/
The document in question is too large to upload here.
..designed to propel multiple KVs..
...up to 12...
Class 1.3? comparable to smokeless powder?!?
they will burn rapidly and intensely but not usually detonate without a lot of extra effort. They are also generally shock-insensitive.
So good for long term storage in a controlled environment such as a silo?
Okay, but I was anticipating a fuel a lot more energetic than Ammonium Perchlorate. Like CL-20 levels of energetic. Though I somehow doubt that CL-20 is Class 1.3.Sounds right. Solid rocket motors with polybutadiene binders are Class 1.3 -- they will burn rapidly and intensely but not usually detonate without a lot of extra effort. They are also generally shock-insensitive.
For a comparable example, the Shuttle SRBs were Class 1.3.
Surprise, CL-20 is Class 1.3. It's less shock sensitive than HMX. It burns but does not detonate unless deliberately initiated.Okay, but I was anticipating a fuel a lot more energetic than Ammonium Perchlorate. Like CL-20 levels of energetic. Though I somehow doubt that CL-20 is Class 1.3.
Dafuq?Surprise, CL-20 is Class 1.3. It's less shock sensitive than HMX. It burns but does not detonate unless deliberately initiated.
Unspent fuel probably gives an added bang on impact.Surprise, CL-20 is Class 1.3. It's less shock sensitive than HMX. It burns but does not detonate unless deliberately initiated.
Dafuq?
That grinding sound yall just heard was my paradigm missing a shift.
Just a little.Unspent fuel probably gives an added bang on impact.
CL-20 has an RE of 1.9 though.Just a little.
But I'd assume that any solid rocket does. I've seen videos of Trident motors getting decommissioned. Ho Lee Fuk that is a BIG badaboom. ~1mile/5sec safety distance!