General Dynamics ATF CGI Model

In the case of a delta, twin tails will be shielded by the wing regardless. In addition to the shielding by the wing, one of the twin tails will be shielded by the other.
 
ScrutorAudax said:
In the case of a delta, twin tails will be shielded by the wing regardless. In addition to the shielding by the wing, one of the twin tails will be shielded by the other.

Not that it would help with stealth but how about ventrals like the F8U-3? Is a vertical tail with two ventral tails as effective as one big vertical or two smaller verticals?
 
Not that it would help with stealth but how about ventrals like the F8U-3?

The main issue with that is clearance on takeoff. The XF8-U3 had folding ventrals (same with the North American-Rockwell FX).

Is a vertical tail with two ventral tails as effective as one big vertical or two smaller verticals?

Yes, but they are all design compromises. It depends on the aerodynamic layout of the plane and its design objectives. For stealth it's a bad idea because you would have three radiators instead of two or one, and the ventral fins would make it even worse because of the increased tolerance for the folding mechanism. For high-alpha properties it could possibly be better.
 
I found a bunch of pictures of the GD ATF rendering. I couldn't tell if they were from Nils_D's model or not. They look very good.
 

Attachments

  • FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF01_zpsddff2013.jpg
    FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF01_zpsddff2013.jpg
    34.7 KB · Views: 208
  • RNGD_ATF02_zps2bd4c079.jpg
    RNGD_ATF02_zps2bd4c079.jpg
    56.7 KB · Views: 218
  • RNGD_ATF01_zps2a43ebe4.jpg
    RNGD_ATF01_zps2a43ebe4.jpg
    60.9 KB · Views: 227
  • JASDFGD_ATF03_zps2ef72e20.jpg
    JASDFGD_ATF03_zps2ef72e20.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 186
  • JASDFGD_ATF02_zpsbdfb9c2e.jpg
    JASDFGD_ATF02_zpsbdfb9c2e.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 178
  • JASDFGD_ATF01_zps9f91f08c.jpg
    JASDFGD_ATF01_zps9f91f08c.jpg
    33.6 KB · Views: 175
  • FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF06_zpscdf3c596.jpg
    FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF06_zpscdf3c596.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 182
  • FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF05_zpsd22f3525.jpg
    FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF05_zpsd22f3525.jpg
    41 KB · Views: 191
  • FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF03_zpsb457886f.jpg
    FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF03_zpsb457886f.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 199
  • FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF02_zps80564d6c.jpg
    FLYGVAPNETGD_ATF02_zps80564d6c.jpg
    48.5 KB · Views: 195
Here's some more.
 

Attachments

  • RNGD_ATF03_zps9e069004.jpg
    RNGD_ATF03_zps9e069004.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 220
  • USNGD_ATF01_zps3593bf1d.jpg
    USNGD_ATF01_zps3593bf1d.jpg
    63.7 KB · Views: 230
  • USNGD_ATF03_zpsc8d8cefb.jpg
    USNGD_ATF03_zpsc8d8cefb.jpg
    56.5 KB · Views: 214
  • USNGD_ATF04_zpsb6dfcdb7.jpg
    USNGD_ATF04_zpsb6dfcdb7.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 225
  • USNGD_ATF05_zpsb8d813c0.jpg
    USNGD_ATF05_zpsb8d813c0.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 256

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom