Future soldier technology (modified thread)

http://taskandpurpose.com/kalashnikov-ak-12-assault-rifle/
 
Future Soldier Technology, 1956.

https://www.ausa.org/publications/soldier-futurarmy#.WSLXq9stwjs.email
 

Attachments

  • 24_Army_1156.jpg
    24_Army_1156.jpg
    730.8 KB · Views: 367
muttbutt said:
TALOS has broken cover.


Concept SOCOM TALOS exoskeleton at SOFIC 2017

xVktgOu.jpg
TALOS personal transport?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/16846/video-futuristic-hoverboard-makes-incredible-chase-stephens

The next generation of personal aviation with the smallest and lightest engines, and redundancy system ever built, meaning should one engine fail, the Zapata™ platform will still operated safely. This is the highest aviation safety standard achieved only by the safest of aircrafts. With Zapata’s™ proprietary balance methodology, algorithms, and patented designs, the Flyboard Air™ is superbly stable in the air and can reach speeds of over 100 mph, allowing the user to fly with exceptional confidence.
 
https://www.armytimes.com/articles/chief-the-army-has-developed-a-bullet-that-penetrates-556-mm-resistant-body-armor

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4076522-u-s-army-hunt-new-rifle-potential-winners
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/05/supervision-for-us-soldiers-using-tactical-augmented-reality-that-replaces-night-vision-gps-and-more.html
 
From USASOC presentation at NDIA Armaments 2017
 

Attachments

  • lwmmg-usasoc.png
    lwmmg-usasoc.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 266
https://www.army.mil/article/188416/auto_targeting_technology_to_reduce_aim_error_in_crew_served_weapons
 
https://www.armytimes.com/articles/army-looks-to-replace-the-squad-automatic-weapon
 
http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2017/07/tomorrow-soldier-how-military-altering-limits-human-performance/139374/
 
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/news/a27414/plastic-ammo-textron-cased-telescope/
 
https://kitup.military.com/2017/07/army-demonstrates-new-age-night-marksmanship-technology.html
 
http://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/07/30/future-infantry-might-not-need-humans/
 
https://special-ops.org/news/special-forces/sas-soldiers-got-bulletproof-helmets-heat-seeking-technology-friend-foe-vision/
 
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/13432/us-army-wants-its-future-automatic-rifle-to-adapt-to-other-roles
 
https://www.army.mil/article/191910/advanced_artillery_system_training_reinforces_warfighter_readiness
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/darpa-squad-x-program-for-integration-of-robots-drones-and-sensors-with-infantry.html
 
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/quadcopter-with-sniper-rifle-or-grenade-launcher.html
 
bobbymike said:
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/08/quadcopter-with-sniper-rifle-or-grenade-launcher.html

Quadrotors seem to be a new god. more like a false prophet. Little profit in continuous expensive crash sites.

how about let's get back to airplanes.
 
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/08/26/the-army-is-working-on-a-safer-but-more-lethal-hand-grenade/

I wonder how many future/improved weapons programs have this said about them?

“With the right funding and time, we could probably do it within a few years,” he added.
 
http://www.unionleader.com/business/marine-corps-selects-safran-optics-gun-mounted-rangefinder-20170901
 
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2017/8/31/tardec-wingman-capability-on-display-at-northern-strike
 
https://www.army.mil/article/193339/army_to_rapidly_procure_reusable_shoulder_fired_weapon_system
 
bobbymike said:
https://www.army.mil/article/193339/army_to_rapidly_procure_reusable_shoulder_fired_weapon_system

So, a 50 year old weapon design is now considered new? I remember firing an L35a1 Carl Gustav back in 1977...
 
The article never calls it new, just points to the substantial improvements in the latest version. Shaving six pounds off the weight and improving functionality (like a programmable fuze setter) seems pretty impressive.
 
TomS said:
The article never calls it new, just points to the substantial improvements in the latest version. Shaving six pounds off the weight and improving functionality (like a programmable fuze setter) seems pretty impressive.

Without a doubt but the weapon still remains at it's heart a Carl Gustav RCL. I question the value of shortening it's barrel, though. The design is still 50 years old.
 
What's your point? So what if the basic design is old. It seems to be very good at meeting the actual needs of the troops.
 
http://tradocnews.org/scientists-developers-demonstrate-maneuver-robotics-systems/
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/30/russia-develops-iron-man-style-armored-suit/
 
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/10/08/the-armys-next-generation-squad-weapon-could-change-the-way-you-fight/

“You don’t want to shoot the guy so you can get closer to shoot him again,” Thompson said. “If I can turn heads into pink mists at 600 meters, then I don’t have to worry about them at 300 meters.”
 
https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-army/2017/10/10/new-50-cal-round-fires-60-meters-under-water/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DFN%20DNR%2010.10.17&utm_term=Editorial%20-%20Daily%20News%20Roundup
 
https://www.militarytimes.com/video/2017/10/10/this-isnt-your-dads-m16-rifle/
 
bobbymike said:
https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-army/2017/10/10/new-50-cal-round-fires-60-meters-under-water/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DFN%20DNR%2010.10.17&utm_term=Editorial%20-%20Daily%20News%20Roundup

Standard ammunition will ricochet off the surface of the water, potentially putting other U.S. ships in harm’s way, Garberg said.
To solve this problem, U.S. Navy ships have been using expensive 30 mm rounds.

Specifically, the supercavitating 30mm x 173mm MK 258 Mod 1 APFDS-T.

Not sure how expensive they are per round since the USG (in its wisdom) now
redacts medium caliber ammunition quantities.
 
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/10/11/army-researchers-are-building-cant-miss-rifle-optics/
 
bobbymike said:
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/10/11/army-researchers-are-building-cant-miss-rifle-optics/

Thank you posting Bobbymike.
The basic tech has been around since the 90s w/Project Whitecloud or Inertial reticle sys (IRS) it would seem this would have long been fielded not that commercial systems are now available to civilians. One can only look at the ineptaphids filling govn offices.
 
https://www.army.mil/article/195105/army_finds_promise_in_durable_material_for_future_soldier_combat_helmets
 
https://kitup.military.com/2017/10/lethality.html?comp=7000029711048&rank=0

http://www.valuewalk.com/2017/10/octopus-skin-is-the-latest-focus-for-us-army-and-air-force-research/
 
http://www.mcwl.marines.mil/Portals/34/Documents/FuturesAssessment/Marine%20Corps%20Science%20Fiction%20Futures%202016_12_9.pdf?ver=2016-12-09-105855-733
 
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/10/21/the-army-is-working-on-a-new-40-mm-round-that-will-make-training-more-realistic/
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom