Falcon-Armed F-86Ds

As early as November 1950, North American Aviation (NAA) had proposed its “Advanced F-86D Transonic Interceptor” to USAF Air Materiel Command. Among its features, the Advanced F-86D would incorporate a low-mounted horizontal tailplane; a 45-degree swept wing, ‘Coke bottle’ area-ruled fuselage and inboard ailerons. Powerplants ranged from the ‘ultimate J47’ to Pratt & Whitney’s J57. Armament was to be a combination of up to 60, 2.75-inch FFAR rockets (and no other armament) or four MX-904 missiles and 36 FFAR rockets. The proposed aircraft would, according to NAA’s proposal, complete its first flight in early 1952 and be ready for service the following year.

It is likely that a routine line of communication was established between the AMC and its contractor for discussion of this topic, though no budget appears to have been put in place for further development under Air Force funding at that time.

Then in March 1952, NAA submitted a further study to AMC, which it continued to refine until August of that year when a less radical proposal for “MX-904 Falcon Missile and 2.75” FFAR Rocket Installation in F-86D Airplane” was proffered. This proposal was for a new-production version of the F-86D with four Falcon missiles replacing the internal Mighty Mouse complement of the standard F-86D and up to 24 of the unguided rockets now in wing packages or various other combinations. An extended ‘wet’ wing leading edge was also proposed, which would carry fuel and offset deletion of external drop tanks. A Hughes E-9A fire control system was a key component of the new F-86D proposal.

NAA proposed the conversion of two existing F-86Ds to test the Falcon installation, though modification of existing F-86Ds for the full (service use) configuration was deemed to be too complex to be worthwhile when ranged against new-build machines. North American suggested that if accepted, the revised configuration could be introduced on F-86D s/n 52-3898 (the first F-86D-45), providing agreement had been reached by 1 December 1952; a revised Engineering Change Proposal was prepared on 23 January 1953, this time proposing to introduce the configuration as a production fit from F-86D-55 s/n 53-557 so long as a contractual note had been received by 1 April 1953.

Ultimately no contract for prototype or production aircraft was set up, undoubtedly because funding was thought to be better spent on dedicated Century-series Falcon-equipped machines as well as similarly armed F-89H Scorpions in the interim.

NAA did however test the external Mighty Mouse rocket packages on s/n 52-3598 (the first F-86D-40 airframe) and the Falcons (externally) on F-86D-60 s/n 53-4061, the latter with the extended-chord wing later installed on F-86L interceptors.
 

Attachments

  • 520808a Falcon.jpg
    520808a Falcon.jpg
    268.5 KB · Views: 303
  • 520808b Falcon.jpg
    520808b Falcon.jpg
    343.9 KB · Views: 120
  • 520808c Falcon.jpg
    520808c Falcon.jpg
    154.1 KB · Views: 96
  • 520905 Falcon.jpg
    520905 Falcon.jpg
    259.7 KB · Views: 96
  • 520908 Falcon.jpg
    520908 Falcon.jpg
    778.8 KB · Views: 92
  • 520908a Falcon.jpg
    520908a Falcon.jpg
    207.9 KB · Views: 90
  • 520908b Falcon.jpg
    520908b Falcon.jpg
    201.8 KB · Views: 87
  • 520908c Falcon.jpg
    520908c Falcon.jpg
    292 KB · Views: 83
  • 530123 Falcon.jpg
    530123 Falcon.jpg
    560.1 KB · Views: 238
  • 520908d Falcon.jpg
    520908d Falcon.jpg
    170.4 KB · Views: 90
  • Falcon (2).jpg
    Falcon (2).jpg
    57.3 KB · Views: 274
  • Falcon (3).jpg
    Falcon (3).jpg
    51.8 KB · Views: 350
  • Falcon.jpg
    Falcon.jpg
    40.2 KB · Views: 344
Last edited:
After this incident were gunsights restored to the F-89s?
If I recall correctly, no. At this time F-89D were already refitted to F-89J standard - with AIR-2 Genie rockets - and nuclear air-to-air rocket isn't exactly the kind of weapon, for which gun sight may be of any use. The F-89H model, that was armed with both FFAR rockets and Falcon missiles have a more advanced E-9 fire control system, that did not have problems with maneuvering targets.
 
Feast your peepers on this factory model....... and yes Virginia, pigs can fly!
Very cool!!!

And mounting the Falcons on the door then simply rotating the whole door... hrm... Not sure about that, I think it takes up more volume than simply opening doors like with the Comanche.
 
And mounting the Falcons on the door then simply rotating the whole door... hrm... Not sure about that, I think it takes up more volume than simply opening doors like with the Comanche

What about an F-101B voodoo interceptor style revolving door launcher?
 
What about an F-101B voodoo interceptor style revolving door launcher?
Still means you need a bay at least as deep as half the width of the door, which is a couple inches wider than the missile wingspan.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom