Fairchild-Republic T-46: the debacle of the NGT winner

Ah! So both my guesses were true. Very interesting! Thanks a lot folks for the explanations.
 
Source: Interavia (Germany) - March 1983 - pages 227-229
 

Attachments

  • Fairchild_T-46A_3view_Interavia_March1938_page228.png
    Fairchild_T-46A_3view_Interavia_March1938_page228.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 868
  • Fairchild_T-46A_cutaway_Interavia_March1938_page229.png
    Fairchild_T-46A_cutaway_Interavia_March1938_page229.png
    301.9 KB · Views: 736
How about that. Add a bunch of 0.303 machine guns underwings, and that unfortunate T-46 could have decimated the whole Luftwaffe, including those peskies Me-262s. ;D He was just born at the wrong time...
 

Attachments

  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 09.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 09.jpg
    143 KB · Views: 229
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 08.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 08.jpg
    75.6 KB · Views: 218
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 07.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 07.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 198
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 06.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 06.jpg
    80.6 KB · Views: 193
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 05.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 05.jpg
    74 KB · Views: 225
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 04.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 04.jpg
    76.1 KB · Views: 220
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 03.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 03.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 197
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 02.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 02.jpg
    97.8 KB · Views: 318
  • kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 01.jpg
    kl 05-2011 USAF Trainingsprogramm 01.jpg
    88.2 KB · Views: 340
Nice set of pics, thanks a lot for scanning and sharing! Just for the record, last picture shows the subscale demonstrator built by Ames Industrial with help from Rutan Aircraft Factory.

I have more about this one on my website here: http://stargazer2006.online.fr/aircraft/pages/ngt.htm
And though not Rutan-related, I also have a page on the T-46: http://stargazer2006.online.fr/derivatives/pages/eaglet.htm
 
Here's some great photos during model testing and construction:
 

Attachments

  • Scaled_T46_Cockpit.jpg
    Scaled_T46_Cockpit.jpg
    90.6 KB · Views: 722
  • T-46Amesdemomodel.jpg
    T-46Amesdemomodel.jpg
    90.9 KB · Views: 751
  • T46_Winglets_Model.jpg
    T46_Winglets_Model.jpg
    90.1 KB · Views: 762
T-46A Mockups and simulator:
 

Attachments

  • T-46engineeringmockup.jpg
    T-46engineeringmockup.jpg
    139.8 KB · Views: 696
  • T-46engineeringmockup2.jpg
    T-46engineeringmockup2.jpg
    119.3 KB · Views: 678
  • T-46simulatorcockpit.jpg
    T-46simulatorcockpit.jpg
    114.7 KB · Views: 159
Electronic Mockup, ejection seat trainer, and cockpit simulator:
 

Attachments

  • T46_Electronic_Sys_Mockup.jpg
    T46_Electronic_Sys_Mockup.jpg
    153.7 KB · Views: 139
  • T-46ejectionseattrainer.jpg
    T-46ejectionseattrainer.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 132
  • T-47simulator.jpg
    T-47simulator.jpg
    88.1 KB · Views: 131
Static test article, fuselage construction, and roll out ceremony:
 

Attachments

  • T-46Arolloutceremony.jpg
    T-46Arolloutceremony.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 181
  • T-46Afuselageconstruction.jpg
    T-46Afuselageconstruction.jpg
    134.8 KB · Views: 139
  • T-46Astatictest.jpg
    T-46Astatictest.jpg
    136.3 KB · Views: 149
With the understanding of winglets at the time, they could have improved the performance, done nothing or made it worse, but probably not by a significant amount compared with FR's other errors.
 
The T-46A's design was heavily influenced by the SAAB-105. Fairchild and SAAB had entered into a partnership to build the SAAB Fairchild SF340 turboprop commuter aircraft and collaborated on the T-46A. The SAAB 105's lines are readily apparent in the T-46A's layout. The H-tail was probably used over the SAAB's T-tail to increase spin recovery and effective control at high angels-of-attack. The winglets, I'm assuming, was to increase fuel economy at altitude as the Eaglet was supposed to be pressurized and cruise up to 41,000ft.

The T-46A was cited by the USAF as having a number of deficiencies. The largest problem was the amount of drag that it produced. I can imagine that the drag issue came up during wind tunnel tests and as a means to reduce drag and increase performance the winglets could have been considered. Ultimately, after the design was frozen FRC had chosen the Garrett F109 engines with a thrust of 1,330 lb st each. The USAF wanted FRC to use the TFE76 demonstration engine of 1,500 lb st. due to concerns over potential weight increases, but FRC decided a use a smaller engine in development with Garrett.

The GAO highlighted these performance deficits:
1. High drag
2. Lack of adequate stall warning
3. Roll trim issues
4. Speed brake buffet
5. Airframe weight increases

Program mismanagement was also cited as a severe problem in the T-46A program at FRC, with slipped delivery dates and substantial cost overruns.
 
I believe it was a less-powerful version of the same basic engine rather than a smaller one. Both are turbofan derivatives of TPE331 turboprop. It could be that the F109 was fully certified while the TFE76 was still a demonstration engine and FRC decided to play it safe there.
 
http://archive.aviationweek.com/issue/19840702/#!&pid=36
 

Attachments

  • 036-.jpg
    036-.jpg
    888.2 KB · Views: 260
I found these.
 

Attachments

  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 007.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 007.jpg
    133.6 KB · Views: 122
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 006.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 006.jpg
    110.8 KB · Views: 71
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 005.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 005.jpg
    113.5 KB · Views: 77
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 004.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 004.jpg
    116.4 KB · Views: 76
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 003.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 003.jpg
    123.5 KB · Views: 74
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 002.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 002.jpg
    95 KB · Views: 83
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 001.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 Model Image 001.jpg
    97.8 KB · Views: 140
...
 

Attachments

  • T46 AWST 6.6.83.jpg
    T46 AWST 6.6.83.jpg
    698.4 KB · Views: 163
The FRC 225 was to be nearly identical to the T-46A version except with four hard wing points for pylons with plumbing for fuel tanks and wiring to release its weapons. The cockpit would include an optical gun sight. FRC was looking to flight test the 225 by July of 1985.

615562
 
...
 

Attachments

  • T46 ffa.jpg
    T46 ffa.jpg
    358.9 KB · Views: 150
  • T46 ff b.jpg
    T46 ff b.jpg
    885 KB · Views: 132
  • T46 ff c.jpg
    T46 ff c.jpg
    817.9 KB · Views: 151
  • T46.jpg
    T46.jpg
    880.4 KB · Views: 181
  • AT46 stations_edited-1.jpg
    AT46 stations_edited-1.jpg
    308.3 KB · Views: 208
God i wish the Air Force had bought these. Might still be seeing new planes roll out of Hagerstown if they did.
 
But Republic screwed up very badly. That's why the plane was rejected and why they went under. They were like freakkin' WWII Curtiss - once great, now dismal.

Of course had Republic not botched the job like they did the plane would have been a fine little trainer.
 
I had never heard of this plane before, but it is shocking. How in the hell did Fairchild go from the A-10 to this in less then a decade? Seriously this plane looks so smiler to the swedish saab 105 biult two decades before hand and they managed to completely fail at it? Honestly stunning.
 
When art was an art - from ePay
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600 (14).jpg
    s-l1600 (14).jpg
    201.4 KB · Views: 38
  • s-l1600 (16).jpg
    s-l1600 (16).jpg
    315.2 KB · Views: 36
  • s-l1600 (15).jpg
    s-l1600 (15).jpg
    151.1 KB · Views: 36
  • s-l1600 (17).jpg
    s-l1600 (17).jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 27
  • s-l1600 (18).jpg
    s-l1600 (18).jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 45
But Republic screwed up very badly. That's why the plane was rejected and why they went under. They were like freakkin' WWII Curtiss - once great, now dismal.

Of course had Republic not botched the job like they did the plane would have been a fine little trainer.
I may be wrong, but I tend to think that the problem lied more with the way Fairchild mismanaged their Republic division, just the way that Curtiss-Wright mismanaged their aviation division.
 
When art was an art
Not only art of drawings - but art of aircraft design. Perhaps, some of the designs appeared to be far from masterpieces, as it sometimes became in the fine art.
This sketch show the exagerrated representeation of T-46, that its' designers were unable to realize into the real aircraft.
P.S. Infamous XFV-12 comes to my mind: very elegant, but very ineffective
 
A lot of pictures can be found at the Cradle of Aviation Museum, One Davis Ave., Garden City, NY 11530.
Here two appetizers.
Links:
 

Attachments

  • Fairchild Republic T-46 NGT Demonstrator_2.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 NGT Demonstrator_2.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 25
  • Fairchild Republic T-46 NGT Demonstrator_1.jpg
    Fairchild Republic T-46 NGT Demonstrator_1.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 27

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom