F-117A spotted flying over Nevada: CONFIRMED

quellish said:
There has been more hangar space available at TTR since other residents moved out. The test support aircraft have gotten more room (RAT-55, F-117s, etc.)
Click to expand...

Any idea where the other residents moved to, or were they deactivated?
 
Question for Quellish - If Lockheed and the USAF had in development / testing / limited use, an aircraft with similar landing / take off /flight characteristics as the F-117, would it not make sense to use these remaining airframes as a daylight training aircraft? Kind of how the Corsair was used for the daylight training ops before the F-117 was allowed to see daylight.
 
Ian33 said:
Question for Quellish - If Lockheed and the USAF had in development / testing / limited use, an aircraft with similar landing / take off /flight characteristics as the F-117, would it not make sense to use these remaining airframes as a daylight training aircraft? Kind of how the Corsair was used for the daylight training ops before the F-117 was allowed to see daylight.
Click to expand...

I'm not Quellish (Obviiously) but I would say no, as I would think the operational costs would be somewhat high to use these assets as day time trainers, especially given the fidelity of today's simulators.
 
But, why is the F-117 still operational? The stealth design is probably effective but no longer special compared to possible modern designs.

Maybe the F-117 is serving as a representative threat aircraft for fighter training.
 
DrRansom said:
But, why is the F-117 still operational? The stealth design is probably effective but no longer special compared to possible modern designs.

Maybe the F-117 is serving as a representative threat aircraft for fighter training.
Click to expand...

They're using them to test new stealth coatings and systems. They have a good baseline of the F-117A's "stealthiness" so they can use it to test upgrades/systems to be able to determine if and how much more effective they would be by comparing the new signature reduction versus the old signature reduction.
 
Sundog said:
Any idea where the other residents moved to, or were they deactivated?
Click to expand...


Some were moved to their new permanent home, other residents (DTRA, etc.) were shuffled around and some moved to NM or other parts of Nevada. TTR was housing assets like SCUD TELs and similar things for some time. The 30th moved to Creech where they have new facilities, though they maintain a presence at TTR. Moving some of these assets around also made some room at other locations. Some things that had been using more secure facilities that did not need that level of security now use TTR or other places.


DrRansom said:
But, why is the F-117 still operational? The stealth design is probably effective but no longer special compared to possible modern designs.Maybe the F-117 is serving as a representative threat aircraft for fighter training.
Click to expand...


[font=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]The F-117s are being used as test assets. They are NOT operational. There is a very limited number of people keeping a very limited number flying, and this is (for the most part) separate from the activities surrounding the aircraft in storage. Flying F-117s requires specialized capabilities that contractors are providing. The F-117s are supporting other programs. They are not being used to simulate threats except in the broadest possible sense. They have been flying in configurations that are pretty much the same as that of the operational aircraft when they were retired - no "UCAV" modifications, super sekrit "magical ram", etc.

[font=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]The F-117 is still quite special, even when compared with "modern" designs. The laws of physics don't change.[/font]

[font=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]You may have noticed that they have not been using "Bandit" numbers as call signs.[/font]

[font=verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif]I am sure someone will notice the recent construction at TTR and claim that the LRS-B/RQ-200/etc. is based there.[/font][/font]
 
quellish said:
The F-117s are being used as test assets. They are NOT operational. There is a very limited number of people keeping a very limited number flying, and this is (for the most part) separate from the activities surrounding the aircraft in storage. Flying F-117s requires specialized capabilities that contractors are providing. The F-117s are supporting other programs. They are not being used to simulate threats except in the broadest possible sense. They have been flying in configurations that are pretty much the same as that of the operational aircraft when they were retired - no "UCAV" modifications, super sekrit "magical ram", etc.

The F-117 is still quite special, even when compared with "modern" designs. The laws of physics don't change.
Click to expand...


When you say they are supporting other programs, but aren't modified, can you clarify? I realize you probably can't say much though. Are they supporting new stealthy weapons tests by serving as a delivery platform, anti-stealth tech, all of the above?
 
Sundog said:
When you say they are supporting other programs, but aren't modified, can you clarify? I realize you probably can't say much though. Are they supporting new stealthy weapons tests by serving as a delivery platform, anti-stealth tech, all of the above?
Click to expand...


A number of different things. Remember that there is a lot of hardware on the ground on the Nellis ranges that looks *up*. There are also platforms that fly and carry sensors, like the Lincoln Labs aircraft.


For example (hypothetically), to support the F-35 program an F-117 might be needed to calibrate the dynamic RCS ranges, or perform work with ground based threats or threat simulators. It may be used to develop penetration methods against specific threats, or it may fly with a platform carrying a thread sensor or weapon. All of this can generate data which would aid the F-35 program. Using the F-117 frees up F-35 program resources until they are needed.
 
Thanks, that's partly what I was thinking but wasn't sure.
 
They are out & about again in Nevada.

http://www.lazygranch.com/bat15.html
 
Congress appears ready to let the Lockheed F-117A Nighthawk go

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/congress-appears-ready-to-let-the-lockheed-f-117a-ni-424690/
 
lowchi said:
Congress appears ready to let the Lockheed F-117A Nighthawk go

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/congress-appears-ready-to-let-the-lockheed-f-117a-ni-424690/
Click to expand...

Couldn't they send a few to museums rather than destroying them all.
 
lowchi said:
Congress appears ready to let the Lockheed F-117A Nighthawk go

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/congress-appears-ready-to-let-the-lockheed-f-117a-ni-424690/
Click to expand...

While the aircraft themselves are kept in type 1000 storage the pool of people who are qualified in them is very, very small. Even if a dozen F-117s were made ready tomorrow there would not be enough pilots and maintainers to use them.
 
Two F-117A spotted flying at Tonopah Test Range in July 2016.
Link: https://theaviationist.com/2016/09/23/watch-two-f-117-stealth-jets-fly-over-nevada-together-8-years-after-retirement/
 
From the FY17 HASC procurement report:

"Section 133—Repeal of Requirement to Preserve Certain Retired F-117 Aircraft
This section would amend section 136 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364) by striking subsection (b), which would remove the requirement that certain F-117 aircraft be maintained in a condition that would allow recall of those aircraft to future service."
 
F-117 Sported Mysterious "Dark Knights" Tail Flash During Recent Mojave Desert Flights

Yet another new tidbit of information has emerged regarding recent F-117 Nighthawk operations over and around Panamint Valley, California. Photos from the aircraft's famous appearance near the aviation photographer haven of Rainbow Canyon have shown the black jets largely stripped of markings, aside from one peculiar and high-profile addition on one of the planes—a color tail stripe prominently displayed on the F-117's 'v' tails. It reads "Dark Knights" and has the iconic planform shape of an F-117 towards the tail's leading edge.
Click to expand...
 
And it has been spotted again this time seemingly sporting Aggressor camouflage. Along with a NASA F-15D with unidentified wing pod.

combataircraft.keypublishing.com

Aggressor F-117? Incredible new images revealed

Combat Aircraft has acquired exclusive images that appear to show a US Air Force F-117A Nighthawk in a hybrid aggressor scheme.
combataircraft.keypublishing.com combataircraft.keypublishing.com
 
Flyaway said:
And it has been spotted again this time seemingly sporting Aggressor camouflage. Along with a NASA F-15D with unidentified wing pod.

combataircraft.keypublishing.com

Aggressor F-117? Incredible new images revealed

Combat Aircraft has acquired exclusive images that appear to show a US Air Force F-117A Nighthawk in a hybrid aggressor scheme.
combataircraft.keypublishing.com combataircraft.keypublishing.com
Click to expand...

It would be interesting to know which pod it was. EDW F-15s regularly fly with diagnostic pods to image VLO aircraft. Never heard of a NASA F-15 doing so.
 
quellish said:
Flyaway said:
And it has been spotted again this time seemingly sporting Aggressor camouflage. Along with a NASA F-15D with unidentified wing pod.

combataircraft.keypublishing.com

Aggressor F-117? Incredible new images revealed

Combat Aircraft has acquired exclusive images that appear to show a US Air Force F-117A Nighthawk in a hybrid aggressor scheme.
combataircraft.keypublishing.com combataircraft.keypublishing.com
Click to expand...

It would be interesting to know which pod it was. EDW F-15s regularly fly with diagnostic pods to image VLO aircraft. Never heard of a NASA F-15 doing so.
Click to expand...

I’ve seen it suggested it was an IRST pod as the USAF have become interested in detecting stealth aircraft using IR.
 
Twitter user GeorgeWilliamHerbert makes an interesting suggestion, rather than being an aggressor scheme

https://twitter.com/x/status/1150476860414783488

"Applique RAM isn’t necessary for function test flights. We know it developed hangar and flight rash and fell off a lot. Those are locations under a lot of aerodynamic pressure. Probably was taken off..."
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom