Dornier / Breguet wind tunnel model of the podded engine configuration and cockpit mockup.

http://archive.aviationweek.com/image/spread/19690602/31/1
 

Attachments

  • DornierBreguet1.png
    DornierBreguet1.png
    124.9 KB · Views: 262
  • DornierBreguet2.png
    DornierBreguet2.png
    112.9 KB · Views: 143
  • DornierBreguet3.png
    DornierBreguet3.png
    388.3 KB · Views: 171

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    332.7 KB · Views: 195
  • 2.png
    2.png
    77.1 KB · Views: 228
Alpha Jet mockup Paris Air Show 1969
 

Attachments

  • Alphajet mockup.jpg
    Alphajet mockup.jpg
    165.5 KB · Views: 259
From L + K 10/1979.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    217.3 KB · Views: 237

Attachments

  • Fotografie-Flugzeug-VFW-Fokker-VF-T291-der-Luftwaffe.jpg
    Fotografie-Flugzeug-VFW-Fokker-VF-T291-der-Luftwaffe.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 137
  • Fotografie-Flugzeug-VFW-Fokker-VF-T291-der-Luftwaffe (1).jpg
    Fotografie-Flugzeug-VFW-Fokker-VF-T291-der-Luftwaffe (1).jpg
    52.3 KB · Views: 140
Because
Why they choose T-tail for trainer? It is dangerous while deep stall.

What ?,It's nor a problem.
I have read this:
The flow condition of deep stall is a common problem of T-tail aircraft at high angles of attack. When the aircraft reaches a certain angle of attack (deep stall angle of attack) after the wing stall, the efficiency of the elevator will be reduced due to the wake of the wing, which makes it very difficult to change the deep stall state.

So I think that the T-tail is not good idea for a trainer.
 
More on the Dornier P.375 from Dornier Post 1/2 1969 in-house magazine attached as a PDF.
Here a German article about the Dornier P.375.
The other pictures featured in this article were already posted in this topic before, or are originally from in-house magazine Dornier Post.
Source (German, and behind a Paywall)
Edit:
I added three pictures from this article to this post today, to show the difference between the versions, either with a sub- or a supersonic wing. :)
 

Attachments

  • 20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue.jpg
    20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue.jpg
    52.7 KB · Views: 40
  • 20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue_002.jpg
    20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue_002.jpg
    35 KB · Views: 13
  • 20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue_003.jpg
    20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue_003.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 15
  • 20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue_004.jpg
    20241016_Dornier P.375_1_model_Eurotrainer_FlugRevue_004.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
Interestingly, Hawker Siddeley Kingston came up with an almost identical design study for the P.1182.
 
The Potez P.92 design pre-dates the others, dating from 1964. The HS.1182 study and P.375 were both 1969 designs.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom