- Joined
- 13 June 2007
- Messages
- 2,173
- Reaction score
- 3,101
Wonderful pics all, thanks! MarkArchipeppe will certainly be pleased...
Wonderful pics all, thanks! MarkArchipeppe will certainly be pleased...
I had forgotten about this image before coming across it again today in the Transport Amphibious Platforms (TAP) concepts thread over in Naval Projects:
![]()
(h/t borovik)
A Soviet Navy TAP-30 'small landing craft', presumably being used to transport a Buran back from one of the more remote back-up landing sites.
(Though for a while, I was wondering if it was actually an illustration of the OK-92 precursor design being transported.)
I came across another photo of the Yamal mockup next to the Buran-Analogue 002
taken in 1999, at Zhukovsky, via this blog post on the excellent "Drew Ex Machina" spaceflight and astronomy blog
![]()
The Day I Saw Buran
Life is filled with surprises big and small. Between 1994 and its cancellation in 2004, I was involved as a member of the American science team in the joint US/Russian RAMOS (Russian American Obse…www.drewexmachina.com
Many tests of elements of rocket and space technology are carried out in flying laboratories. This happened most fully during the creation of the Buran orbiter in the 1980s. In particular, the MiG-25 and Tu-154 laboratory aircraft were used to test the ship's automatic landing system.
For the final testing of the final stage of the Buran's flight and its landing, including in automatic mode, a full-size analogue aircraft BTS-002 was built. Its tests were carried out in Zhukovsky near Moscow - at the Gromov Flight Research Institute together with the Experimental Machine-Building Plant named after V.M. Myasishchev. It flew for the first time on November 10th, 1985, piloted by Gromov Flight Research Institute test pilots Igor Volk and Rimantas Stankevicius. They were originally planned as the crew for the first manned flight of the Buran.
yo where is my shuttle goin pic.twitter.com/s14vmRc4A8
— Amaury - CtS (@ClosertoSpace) September 24, 2021
And even worse economics!I keep pushing for SLS to evolve into Shuttle II if Starship doesn’t work out. With hydrogen engines off the orbiter, it can have better handling characteristics.
Same feelings overall, albeit mixed. My POV is that the very concept of space shuttles was deeply flawed, but the Russian take at it was interesting nonetheless. Not only an orbiter (Buran) but also the full and entire family of rockets spun out of it: Energiya, Zenit, and all the others.On topic; Personally i have never cared about Buran but Energiya is an engineering marvel. Such a shame it only flew twice and never got close to its true potential.
Probably you will have to use VPN though
That would be due to a lack of experience and knowledge and a bias towards everything SovietThe Energia-Buran stack is still the most futuristic looking craft I have ever seen on a pad.
Thanks for the link, but I'm not able to download the PDFs. I only get message SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG. Please, can you download them and upload them somewhere? Thanks.
In File 29 about air transport of loads, what are the longer boosters/Blok A without recovery systems under the name 23/25 GT ? they're a good 7-8m longer than the Block A used for Energia.![]()
"Blocks A of the Vulcan launch vehicle are not equipped with recovery means and associated elements. Compared to blocks A of the Energia rocket, the volume of fuel tanks has been increased due to cylindrical inserts 7 m long."![]()
Диспетчер Карлос
Диспетчер Карлос is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Диспетчер Карлос and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected.www.facebook.com
A wind tunnel model of the Buran orbiter. pic.twitter.com/pPnJUaVAmA
— The Energia Buran Archive (@11K25_Energia) February 9, 2024
Buran gyro platform