Designs that led to the Hawker Siddeley Trident

From the Hatfield Future Projects Newsletter No.19 November 1987

Investigations into possible stretches of the Trident (HS 132 and 134) for the short-medium range role during 1965 showed that an attractive possibility was the HS 134 with 183 seats at 34" pitch. This aircraft used the Trident cockpit and fuselage diameter and hence many of the components and details appropriate to the Trident fuselage. Two RB 178-14 engines were mounted on a new 25° swept wing. Trident system components were to be used wherever appropriate, but the air conditioning system and other systems affected by passenger capacity and aircraft size were, of necessity, new.

The passenger capacity of the Airbus, on which HSA expect to agree an outline specification with Sud Aviation very soon, is dependent upon the engine finally chosen by the governments concerned, and its seating could range from 240 seats with the JT9 at approximately 41,000 lb. thrust, to 260-270 seats with the RB 207 of 48,000-50,000 lb. thrust.

Market surveys have indicated that such an aircraft is on the large side for BEA and other European operators in the early 1970s, with the exception of Air France and Air Inter who have stated a requirement for a 250 seat arrangement. It is quite possible that a decision mild be taken to proceed with a new Rolls-Royce engine of 28,000-30,000 lb. thrust, since such an engine couldd have a wider application in a new four-engined long range aircraft, as proposed by Douglas, or in a three-engined aircraft, such as those being considered by Lockheed, Douglas and Convair. Further examination has therefore been made of the HS 134 fitted with two RB 207s scaled to 28,000 lb. thrust, the design incorporating the increased knowledge obtained during the last year of Airbus design work.

2x RB207 of 28,000 lb Take off thrust static
Wing Area 1,900 sq.ft.
Sweep 25°
Span 123 ft. 2 ins.
Overall Length 158 ft. 6 ins.
Fuselage external diameter 12 ft. 11 ins.


Image No.1 shows the Mid 1967 Final Configuration, with the earlier T Tail version from 1966 inset.
Image No.2 shows the T Tail Configuration
Image No.3 Shows a similar design from 1977 simply labelled JET 001. Drawn by CFD Clarke this is I think part of the early 'Jet' studies that led to the Airbus A320 and whilst smaller makes use of 'Derived Components'... of note is the 146 style nose...

Zeb
 

Attachments

  • 134-1.jpg
    134-1.jpg
    275 KB · Views: 74
  • 134-2.jpg
    134-2.jpg
    370.4 KB · Views: 63
  • Jet-001.jpg
    Jet-001.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 83
Last edited:
From the Hatfield Future Projects Newsletter No.19 November 1987

Investigations into possible stretches of the Trident (HS 132 and 134) for the short-medium range role during 1965 showed that an attractive possibility was the HS 134 with 183 seats at 34" pitch. This aircraft used the Trident cockpit and fuselage diameter and hence many of the components and details appropriate to the Trident fuselage. Two RB 178-14 engines were mounted on a new 25° swept wing. Trident system components were to be used wherever appropriate, but the air conditioning system and other systems affected by passenger capacity and aircraft size were, of necessity, new.

The passenger capacity of the Airbus, on which HSA expect to agree an outline specification with Sud Aviation very soon, is dependent upon the engine finally chosen by the governments concerned, and its seating could range from 240 seats with the JT9 at approximately 41,000 lb. thrust, to 260-270 seats with the RB 207 of 48,000-50,000 lb. thrust.

Market surveys have indicated that such an aircraft is on the large side for BEA and other European operators in the early 1970s, with the exception of Air France and Air Inter who have stated a requirement for a 250 seat arrangement. It is quite possible that a decision mild be taken to proceed with a new Rolls-Royce engine of 28,000-30,000 lb. thrust, since such an engine couldd have a wider application in a new four-engined long range aircraft, as proposed by Douglas, or in a three-engined aircraft, such as those being considered by Lockheed, Douglas and Convair. Further examination has therefore been made of the HS 134 fitted with two RB 207s scaled to 28,000 lb. thrust, the design incorporating the increased knowledge obtained during the last year of Airbus design work.

2x RB207 of 28,000 lb Take off thrust static
Wing Area 1,900 sq.ft.
Sweep 25°
Span 123 ft. 2 ins.
Overall Length 158 ft. 6 ins.
Fuselage external diameter 12 ft. 11 ins.


Image No.1 shows the Mid 1967 Final Configuration, with the earlier T Tail version from 1966 inset.
Image No.2 shows the T Tail Configuration
Image No.3 Shows a similar design from 1977 simply labelled JET 001. Drawn by CFD Clarke this is I think part of the early 'Jet' studies that led to the Airbus A320 and whilst smaller makes use of 'Derived Components'... of note is the 146 style nose...

Zeb
The second matches the description of the "Trident 5" mentioned in Flight of the Titans: Boeing, Airbus, and the Battle for the Future of Air Travel
AHs97-m44_Mf-Yj3-UE40yRTwTskDzPhq7w_Qr9W-qVJ1mWNqXuT9hGMi5I0SGLBwm-5LkgpzVebnjliyLAfyxsIkHqIfZp0wPrCV_0puwtP2Qc6JFdbt00hA1Sve74J2PpbB9n85M35hHNKYIeuS5B4OqQ4BNo4BflVx6SBNMTiAVDX4u0Rh2DYBNw=s0-d
by Kenny Kemp. Virgin Books, 2006, p100-106.

In that book, they talk about how Boeing and BAe had very serious discussions about making the Boeing 757 a joint US-UK program and the investment on the British side was less than what was needed to rejoin Airbus.
 
very serious discussions about...757.
The Labour Party won 1974's Elections inc a commitment to Nationalise the shipbuilding/repair sector, much employment in Labour seats, and in decline. They had added Aero manufacture (not repair), in part as they already enjoyed parentage of Shorts, RR, Ferranti, so thought they understood that industry, and in part to broaden the business to be managed, in hope some element might generate black ink. In due course new Ministers would let the non-Defence marine sector quietly expire (most yards were in the wrong place to handle long, deep hulls), and the Aero sector was unloaded to risk-capital. But in 1977 what-to-do-with Aero came to PM Callaghan's desk.

He picked up Industry contacts with MDC and Boeing and flew over to talk to them. He judged they were interested in Brit wallets, not in Brir brains, so he rejected US, to join Airbus Industrie as a voting owner. More discussion in the what-should-have-been-built thread.
 
From Aeroplane 1956.
 

Attachments

  • 23.png
    23.png
    660.4 KB · Views: 44

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom