Forest Green
ACCESS: Above Top Secret
- Joined
- 11 June 2019
- Messages
- 8,450
- Reaction score
- 14,394
This sorta of sounds like basically a single use unmanned UCAV drone with only a cannon aboard imo
If I understood correctly, Gunslinger program was announced in 2020. And basically nothing was heard about it again. So, why sudden interest now?
Perhaps it could shoot down more than one enemy plane.This sorta of sounds like basically a single use unmanned UCAV drone with only a cannon aboard imo
But I don't see how this would be useful in a BVR scenario and how would it be more useful/economical than actual full sized CCAs that could fire actual BVR missiles and be reusable. I mean a cruise missile with a gun onboard doesn't sound cheap imo. Perhaps it might be used as a risk free CAS solution against low intensity counter insurgency ops?Perhaps it could shoot down more than one enemy plane.
I don't see why one would do this.
I don't see why one would do this.
Very good question. As @quellish pointed out, it was in the FY21 budget request but it's not clear it was actually funded.
The Gunslinger program will develop and demonstrate technologies to enable an air-launched tactical range
missile system capable of multi-mission support. This system will utilize the high maneuverability of a missile system coupled
with a gun system capable of scalable effects and engagement of multiple targets. These mission sets addressed will include
counter insurgency (COIN) operations, close air support (CAS) and air-to-air engagements. The metrics associated with this
system include total range (which includes transit to target, loiter and engagement) and weapon system effectiveness. The
program will address the system and technology issues required to enable development of a robust missile system considering
(1) vehicle concepts possessing the required aerodynamic, propulsion, and payload capacity for a wide operational envelope, (2) the algorithms that support maneuvering and target recognition to enable expedited command decision making for selecting and engaging targets and (3) approaches to incorporating modularity of design to reduce cost throughout the design and development process. The anticipated transition partners for this effort are the Air Force and the Navy.
Frankly, the whole idea looks a bit... dubious. How the relatively lightweight missile is supposed to dealt with the recoil from the cannon? If I recall correctly, the GAU-22/A produce almost 17 kN of recoil force. Unless the missile is unreasonably massive, how exactly it's supposed to avoid being thrown off-target after the first few shots?Very good question. As @quellish pointed out, it was in the FY21 budget request but it's not clear it was actually funded.
Perhaps they've mounted a lightweight 20mm rotary cannon with heavily slowed firing rate to reduce recoil and also probably to not choke the poor engine on this thing.Frankly, the whole idea looks a bit... dubious. How the relatively lightweight missile is supposed to dealt with the recoil from the cannon? If I recall correctly, the GAU-22/A produce almost 17 kN of recoil force. Unless the missile is unreasonably massive, how exactly it's supposed to avoid being thrown off-target after the first few shots?
Maybe if you mount something similar to an APKWS rocket pod on the nose of the "missile" and somehow include a designator in it, you can resolve the recoil and simulate it as a multiple warhead missile capable of hitting one target at a time and with precision. ...Perhaps they've mounted a lightweight 20mm rotary cannon with heavily slowed firing rate to reduce recoil and also probably to not choke the poor engine on this thing.
Agreed. Also introducing more moving parts...and thus things to go wrong.If you're sticking a gun into a missile, you're throwing away that gun after every missile launch.
Someone may finally have found a mission where Metalstorm makes sense!If you're sticking a gun into a missile, you're throwing away that gun after every missile launch.
I'm thinking... cheap out the components so it just barely holds together for however many rounds are in the onboard magazine
Someone may finally have found a mission where Metalstorm makes sense!
You know, that may be a good use for the idea!Someone may finally have found a mission where Metalstorm makes sense!
You know, that may be a good use for the idea!
Thinking from a ACM perspective, I imagine it as a sure, the missile won't hit you, but the rounds will... Imagine a single line of closely spaced air burst projectiles rattled off in a line where the plane is suspected to fly throughYou know, that may be a good use for the idea!
Easy. We'll just mount another cannon in the missile facing backwards and let the recoil cancel out.How the relatively lightweight missile is supposed to dealt with the recoil from the cannon?
Remind me of the "Broforce" game wherein the Terminator Arnold wielded a gatling the size of his character laid sideway and could propel himself across the map by just aiming in the opposite direction.Easy. We'll just mount another cannon in the missile facing backwards and let the recoil cancel out.
Worked for the Davis Gun.Easy. We'll just mount another cannon in the missile facing backwards and let the recoil cancel out.
The only platform for caseless..no Pilot to aggravateYou know, that may be a good use for the idea!
Which, by the way, is much more reasonable.had a similar idea back in middle school except the missile fire more micro missiles.
Witness Starstreak.Which, by the way, is much more reasonable.