seruriermarshal
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 4 May 2008
- Messages
- 1,180
- Reaction score
- 557
Triton said:Model of Lockheed Martin LRASM-B manufactured by Azle Models
Source:
http://www.azlemodels.com/slideshow/photos-5/slideshow-2/page21.html
donnage99 said:Wonder what that does to the stealth coating
Grey Havoc said:Resuming production of the W80 would certainly be a good first step, but the USN also really needs a naval version of the AGM-129 for a long range stealthy 'left hook', ideally combined with a licence produced ANS or similar for a medium range high speed 'uppercut'.
With a 10lb warhead in a missile totally unoptimized for the VLS, and no range? No thanks.marauder2048 said:Weaponized GQM-163a perhaps?
marauder2048 said:Weaponized GQM-163a perhaps?
Lockheed Martin and the US Navy (USN) are negotiating a production contract for the company's Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), Hady Mourad, Lockheed Martin's tactical missiles advanced programmes director, told IHS Jane's during a 13 April interview at the Navy League's Sea-Air-Space conference.
"We're negotiating that right now," said Mourad. "Hopefully we'll be on contract later this year."
The semi-autonomous missile is expected to limit reliance on datalinks in order to avoid jamming while also countering the growing maritime threats in anti-access/area-denial environments. It will provide the Pentagon with far greater stand-off range than existing weapons.
After LRASM prototypes completed two successful flight tests in 2013, LRASM transitioned from a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) technology demonstration programme to a formal USN programme of record in February 2014. In March 2014 the USN said it would acquire LRASM to meet its air-launched Increment 1 requirement for the offensive anti-surface weapon (OASuW) programme. Initial integration is planned on the US Air Force's (USAF's) Boeing (Rockwell) B-1 Lancer, followed by the USN's Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.
Since it is based on the USAF's legacy Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), Mourad noted, the LRASM programme will leverage an existing production line in Troy, Alabama. He added that Lockheed Martin will invest in expanding that facility to accommodate the potential LRASM deal. "When it becomes a programme of record for the navy, that's when we will need more capacity," he said.
Meanwhile, the navy is conducting an analysis of alternatives for OASuW increment 2. Mourad said Lockheed Martin will bid if the Pentagon decides to go forward with that effort. "We feel confident that we have the right solution for what the navy is looking for," he said, adding that the company is working on integrating LRASM onto submarines. "We're also doing work with submarines; looking to launch from a canister," he said. "We are investing in developing that capability."
A competition for OASuW Increment 2 could open as soon as 2017. Raytheon, expected to be Lockheed Martin's principal rival for OASuW Increment 2, has been studying the use of technologies from its Tomahawk cruise missile and its AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) for OASuW. The company has already competed engineering studies for a multimission Tomahawk weapon, using the existing Tactical Tomahawk Block IV weapon system infrastructure to meet a so-called Interim OASuW requirement.
Moose said:The Navy is waiting for the Hypersonics programs to produce a workable configuration, then they'll jump into developing and fielding a hypersonic missile.
sferrin said:Moose said:The Navy is waiting for the Hypersonics programs to produce a workable configuration, then they'll jump into developing and fielding a hypersonic missile.
Considering how many failed high speed programs litter the US landscape, most killed practically in the cradle, I have zero confidence that they'll be able to make the jump from subsonic to hypersonic without doing a lot of leg work.