CX-HLS (Cargo Experimental, Heavy Logistic Support) designs & derivatives

Douglas C5A model

https://www.ebay.com/itm/RARE-VINTAGE-DOUGLAS-C-5A-CX-HLS-USAF-MODEL-PLANE-W-STAND/282957743760?hash=item41e1988690:g:dMIAAOSwQRla8eo8
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    135.2 KB · Views: 360
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    134.9 KB · Views: 287
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    117.1 KB · Views: 249
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    131 KB · Views: 233
Pioneer said:
I found and cropped this picture of Douglas D-920 mock up under construction
(Source: https://www.google.com.au/search?client=ms-opera-mobile&channel=new&espv=1&biw=360&bih=311&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=nhrtWt3BGobR0gSW1Kj4Dg&q=LeFanaDelAviationMag+on+Twitter:+Douglas+CX-HLS&oq=LeFanaDelAviationMag+on+Twitter:+Douglas+CX-HLS&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-img.3...15229.58439..59452...0....396.3935.0j3j14j1......0....1.o%2FOWeqawq6s%3D#imgrc=8-lkMi1MQYr6HM:)

Regards
Pioneer

clearer image form the same source
 

Attachments

  • C6OqqCwXMAAnPvJ.jpg
    C6OqqCwXMAAnPvJ.jpg
    257.5 KB · Views: 314
pometablava said:
Giants of the Sky by Bill Gunston
ISBN 1-85260-258-9

LOCKHEED MARTIN C-5 GALAXY: WarbirdTech 36


In 1960 the USAF launched Project Forecast which called for the world's biggest logistic transport, the CX-4, in the 600,000 lb category. It should be a jet. The only study I know comes from Douglas but I have no details about its Model Number. I guess that Boeing and Lockheed carried out its own designs.

With all the data generated under CX-4 study, the USAF launched an specification for a CX-HLS aircraft. The winner was Lockheed (C-5 Galaxy)

Douglas submitted several designs: Model D-890, D-895, D-900. According to "Giants of the Sky", the definitive design was D-916 while D-920 was the submission for the Wardbirdtech volume.

I have included to this post the D-920.

The last scan is Boeing C-5A from Giants of the Sky. Anybody knows Boeing's model number for it?

A clearer and larger view;

 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    559.6 KB · Views: 295
I agree with scott opinion about full-scale mockups. The SST produced three of them (2707-200, 2707-300, and L-2000). The first vanished without a trace. The second only saved its nose, and after 40 years spent travelling across the United States. As for the L-2000, the FAA took it from Lockheed and used it for SST passenger evacuations, and then it was scrapped. A pity, really.

The Shuttle full size mockup survived only because the Shuttle kept evolving over the years and decades, and Rockwell had to keep up with the changes brought by NASA.
 
Just found this snippet of information in the book The C-5A Galaxy Scandal: A $5 Billion Boondoggle by the Military Industrial Complex by Berkeley Rice

(P.S. I hope this info hasn't already been denoted :eek:)




Regards
Pioneer
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180916_204013.jpg
    IMG_20180916_204013.jpg
    706 KB · Views: 302
Oh, found this information from The C-5A Galaxy Scandal: A $5 Billion Boondoggle by the Military Industrial Complex by Berkeley Rice very interesting!

Regards
Pioneer
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180919_195222.jpg
    IMG_20180919_195222.jpg
    593.5 KB · Views: 324

Attachments

  • Pages from ustp08_Page_5.jpg
    Pages from ustp08_Page_5.jpg
    50.4 KB · Views: 484
  • Pages from ustp08_Page_4.jpg
    Pages from ustp08_Page_4.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 520
  • Pages from ustp08_Page_3.jpg
    Pages from ustp08_Page_3.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 497
  • Pages from ustp08_Page_2.jpg
    Pages from ustp08_Page_2.jpg
    114.6 KB · Views: 427
  • Pages from ustp08_Page_1.jpg
    Pages from ustp08_Page_1.jpg
    193.8 KB · Views: 421
SorenThePilot said:
Interesting official image of the GL-194-12 I found on the front of an Aerospace Projects Review Catalog.

http://www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/catalog/adoc28.jpg

Welcome aboard at first,and nice find.
 
Similar drawings are elsewhere in this thread but thought I'd include it.
 

Attachments

  • Douglas C5 a.png
    Douglas C5 a.png
    782.9 KB · Views: 347
1606374319306.png

I just stumbled upon this early concept art of a 757. It seems that the 757 was intended to be another large maybe even larger plane than the 747 instead of being a smaller single-aisle airliner it became. Unless this was just a concept of ANOTHER plane called the 757 which doesn't have any link to the real 757 and was just using the next number after 747.
 
So, I have heard that boeings design was considered superior and was recommended by the usaf but McNamara choices the Lockheed proposal because it was cheeper (and obviously they under bid) now what i have not been able to find is why the boeing design was considered superior, because from what I can find (wich isn't a lot) is that both proposals were practically the same.
 
Last edited:
From, IT-500 TESE
PROJECT STATUS
“INTEGRATED AIRCRAFT DESIGN AND
AIR TRANSPORT NETWORK OPTIMIZATION”
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    241.9 KB · Views: 125
  • 2.png
    2.png
    254.8 KB · Views: 125
  • 3.png
    3.png
    259.7 KB · Views: 158
From, IT-500 TESE
PROJECT STATUS
“INTEGRATED AIRCRAFT DESIGN AND
AIR TRANSPORT NETWORK OPTIMIZATION”
Is it just me or does that "Lockheed concept" models wing-box/wingroot look extra chunky and unaerodynamic?

P.S. I think it goes without saying, that the Boeing Concept appears to be much more aerodynamic than either Douglas' or Lockheed's design

Regards
Pioneer
 
From, IT-500 TESE
PROJECT STATUS
“INTEGRATED AIRCRAFT DESIGN AND
AIR TRANSPORT NETWORK OPTIMIZATION”
Is it just me or does that "Lockheed concept" models wing-box/wingroot look extra chunky and unaerodynamic?

P.S. I think it goes without saying, that the Boeing Concept appears to be much more aerodynamic than either Douglas' or Lockheed's design

Regards
Pioneer

My dear Pioneer,

I think the Boeing model is more dynamic, as I said, but less practical in term of performance.
 
Found these pictures of Lockheed 'C-5 mockup' dated 1966 on Ebay...

Regards
Pioneer
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220716_230504.jpg
    IMG_20220716_230504.jpg
    169.1 KB · Views: 125
  • IMG_20220716_230400.jpg
    IMG_20220716_230400.jpg
    245.9 KB · Views: 115
  • IMG_20220716_230422.jpg
    IMG_20220716_230422.jpg
    377.8 KB · Views: 156
Last edited:
From American Aviation 1964,

a good article.
Thanks hesham for sharing the article. I find the following snippet intriguing , given the extent that that a Chook has to be stripped to fit within the Lockheed C-5.

Regards
Pioneer
 

Attachments

  • Douglas C-5A design (American Aviation 1964).jpg
    Douglas C-5A design (American Aviation 1964).jpg
    59 KB · Views: 94
  • IMG_20221210_085531.jpg
    IMG_20221210_085531.jpg
    142 KB · Views: 115
One of the first C-5A models is given a final inspection before testing in the Arnold Engineering Development Complex 16-foot transonic wind tunnel at Arnold Air Force Base in the mid-1960s. The wind tunnel, also known as 16T, is part of the AEDC Propulsion Wind Tunnel facility. PWT was designated as an International Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark in 1989. (U.S. Air Force photo)
 

Attachments

  • 210521-F-F3405-0004.jpg
    210521-F-F3405-0004.jpg
    246.3 KB · Views: 97

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    100.7 KB · Views: 82
  • 2.png
    2.png
    429.6 KB · Views: 120
Found this pic of Boeing C-5 fuselage mock-up in Air Pictorial, March 1965.

Regards
Pioneer
 

Attachments

  • Douglas C-5A design (Air Pictorial, March 1965).jpg
    Douglas C-5A design (Air Pictorial, March 1965).jpg
    110.7 KB · Views: 97

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom