My numbers came from the engine sections of Jane's Aircraft (many years of volumes) and other such sources, so I wouldn't be surprised if they are a little off.

The airflow and thrust numbers you have are for the earlier F100-P-100 & -200 originally put in the F-15 & F-16 in the 1970s - the numbers I gave are for the improved higher-thrust F100-P-220 & -229 introduced in the late 1980s in those aircraft as I noted.
 
Everything I´ve seen on the former is in between about 250 and 260 lb/s (e.g., Tommy Thomasons excellent book on the F8-U3 gives 261 lb/s @ 26.000 lbf of thrust) and around 230 lb/s for the latter, with a thrust of about 23,800 lbf.
Upwards of 120 lbf per lb/s of airflow is something you wouldn´t get till about 1990.

Yep, turbine inlet temperatures would've been too low.
 
My numbers came from the engine sections of Jane's Aircraft (many years of volumes) and other such sources, so I wouldn't be surprised if they are a little off.

The airflow and thrust numbers you have are for the earlier F100-P-100 & -200 originally put in the F-15 & F-16 in the 1970s - the numbers I gave are for the improved higher-thrust F100-P-220 & -229 introduced in the late 1980s in those aircraft as I noted.
Well, again, all references i´ve seen (but that list might obviously not be all-encompassing) credit the basic -220 engine with the same thrust (about 106 kN / 24 klbf) as the earlier versions (some sources only give 22 klbf for the -100 / -200).
Thrust levels you provided would only be possible with the later -220P, introducing significantly higher PR by adopting more advanced fan technology.

(ETA: I should have said, I´m not talking about the -229, where you are obviously quoting "canonical" values. Regards!)
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • 0572720b.jpg
    0572720b.jpg
    377.2 KB · Views: 308
  • e1e9c17b.jpg
    e1e9c17b.jpg
    151.7 KB · Views: 159
Last edited:

Attachments

  • objective of this program.jpg
    objective of this program.jpg
    298.1 KB · Views: 140
  • modification#1.jpg
    modification#1.jpg
    556.6 KB · Views: 145
  • modification#3.jpg
    modification#3.jpg
    516 KB · Views: 139
  • modification#5.jpg
    modification#5.jpg
    474 KB · Views: 138
  • modification#7.jpg
    modification#7.jpg
    514.7 KB · Views: 129
  • modification #1 #3 #5.jpg
    modification #1 #3 #5.jpg
    216.9 KB · Views: 116
  • modification #7.jpg
    modification #7.jpg
    84.9 KB · Views: 95
  • ADEN NOZZLE.jpg
    ADEN NOZZLE.jpg
    80.5 KB · Views: 100
  • EoPT7euXEAAc5c5.jpg
    EoPT7euXEAAc5c5.jpg
    47 KB · Views: 98
  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    12.2 KB · Views: 93
  • conclusion.jpg
    conclusion.jpg
    183.5 KB · Views: 159
Last edited:
That all depends on the scenario, the allowed weapons, and so on.

Let the F-101 have a pair of Genie AAMs and the freedom to use them, nothing gets close enough to even shoot a missile at it.
 
That all depends on the scenario, the allowed weapons, and so on.

Let the F-101 have a pair of Genie AAMs and the freedom to use them, nothing gets close enough to even shoot a missile at it.
Genies only have a 6mi range...

If the F-111B gets to play, it splashes 6 birds from about 100nmi out with Phoenixes. It may struggle against the last 2 planes, using Sidewinders. F-111s do NOT like dogfighting.

Otherwise, the F-110 is the likely winner, even if it is stuck using IR Falcons.
 
Hi! Spike project.
 

Attachments

  • 1-1-1000x600.jpg
    1-1-1000x600.jpg
    54.9 KB · Views: 116
  • 2-1000x600.jpg
    2-1000x600.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 95
  • 3-1000x600.jpg
    3-1000x600.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 100
  • SPIKE_PROJECT.jpg
    SPIKE_PROJECT.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 104
  • Project-Spike-F-106-ASAT-580795.pdf
    711.4 KB · Views: 15
Hi!
Case 29(ⅩⅩⅨ) wing and case14(ⅩⅣ) wing station diagram. (upper surface)
Source : FAMOUS AIRPLANES OF THE WORLD CONVAIR F-106 DELTA DART. ISBN978-4-89319-327-8, etc
 

Attachments

  • case 29 wing station diagram.jpg
    case 29 wing station diagram.jpg
    1,004 KB · Views: 77
  • Case14( XIV) wing station diagram (upper surface).jpg
    Case14( XIV) wing station diagram (upper surface).jpg
    1 MB · Views: 71
Last edited:
Comparing the length of F-100, F-102 and F-106 in the drawing by Mr. Steve Freeman, I feel on the same scale.
 

Attachments

  • GOk9u7TXkAEfsy0.jpg
    GOk9u7TXkAEfsy0.jpg
    207.4 KB · Views: 76
  • i.jpg
    i.jpg
    937 KB · Views: 78
  • 572516 NASA 816 Vortex Flap 06.jpg
    572516 NASA 816 Vortex Flap 06.jpg
    504.1 KB · Views: 83
  • 572516 NASA 816 Vortex Flap 12.jpg
    572516 NASA 816 Vortex Flap 12.jpg
    679.9 KB · Views: 76
  • VortexFlaps_FlightInternational_WindTunnelTests_1985 (1).jpg
    VortexFlaps_FlightInternational_WindTunnelTests_1985 (1).jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 75
  • VortexFlaps_FlightInternational_article_17sep1988.jpg
    VortexFlaps_FlightInternational_article_17sep1988.jpg
    653.4 KB · Views: 73
  • NASA-VortexFlaps-F106B-InFlight-Results-Report2003.pdf
    3 MB · Views: 15
Last edited:
Genies only have a 6mi range...

If the F-111B gets to play, it splashes 6 birds from about 100nmi out with Phoenixes. It may struggle against the last 2 planes, using Sidewinders. F-111s do NOT like dogfighting.

Otherwise, the F-110 is the likely winner, even if it is stuck using IR Falcons.
That makes it appear that the Genie carrier is on a one way trip. I thought that sort of thing was for 'other folk'.
 
That makes it appear that the Genie carrier is on a one way trip. I thought that sort of thing was for 'other folk'.
Genie is a rocket, you let fly and do a 180.

And it's a small boom, the Genie was tested with USAF officers standing unprotected under the detonation point of the live warhead about 18,000ft above them.
 
Genie is a rocket, you let fly and do a 180.

And it's a small boom, the Genie was tested with USAF officers standing unprotected under the detonation point of the live warhead about 18,000ft above them.
Thanks mate.
 
I imagine the Phoenix missile was far to big to have fit into the Dart's weapon bay.

Probably not. Both missiles have the same wingspan and sensibly the same length. The major factor at play is the effectiveness of the warhead...

f-106%2Bdiagram.PNG
 
Genie was to turn nukes on the bombers into duds, not to kill so much.
 
There is a whole lot of volume to fill, so not as likely to kill dispersed groups in practice. Soviet bombers flew during peace-time within visual range of others but in a hot war this was not expected to happen. The lack of effectiveness to dispersed targets made this a goldplated solution.
 
There is a whole lot of volume to fill, so not as likely to kill dispersed groups in practice. Soviet bombers flew during peace-time within visual range of others but in a hot war this was not expected to happen. The lack of effectiveness to dispersed targets made this a goldplated solution.
It may have been considered good enough against single bombers as well; the RAF considered chucking tactical nuclear bombs at individual aircraft.
 

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom