Consolidated-Vultee XP-81 mixed-propulsion fighter

I also see the confusion here. I see an "axial" compressor system as inline with the turbine and the combustors inline between the two. The TG 100 still uses a centrifugal configuration with the cans arranged around the compressor even though it is inline with the turbine.
Then you are using a definition of axial and centrifugal that is different from everyone else.
 
General_Electric_T31%2C_Presidential_Gallery%2C_National_Museum_USAF_%28cropped%29.jpg

TG 100 Turboprop. Sure looks like a J31 to me...
Don't be fooled by the can-type burners, (Which are behind the compressor section, wouldn't be much use, otherwise) and the large turbine section - that turbine has to be powering both the compressor and the prop shaft.
 
Please read this,very strange,

XP-81 (British Engines) – Unofficial variant proposed by Consolidated Vultee some time in 1949/1950 calling for the revival of the XP-81 project using British Armstrong-Siddeley Double Mamba turboprop producing 4,000 hp and a Rolls-Royce R.B 41 jet engine producing 6,250 lb (2,835 kg) of thrust replacing original engines. This new variant would be used as a ground attacker that would be solely used for export. This proposal never saw any development and was thus discarded.

 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom