- Joined
- 9 October 2009
- Messages
- 21,147
- Reaction score
- 12,252
Still digging, but no luck so far.Do you have any pictures of the tank? Any further diagrams or further reading?
Still digging, but no luck so far.Do you have any pictures of the tank? Any further diagrams or further reading?
Rifled?Via the SNAFU
I don't think so. That has got to be the same Rheinmetall 130mm smoothbore the Germans are trying to sell NATO on.Rifled?Via the SNAFU
Another company owned vehicle?Now where is it fitted to an Abrams?
Unless a new type of light fighting vehicles based off of the Boxer is procured. I have seen images of the variants being offered to the British Army, and one of them does mount a 105mm gun. I shall try to find it, but it is probably buried deep in my collection.German company in frame for £750m British Army tank contract
Rheinmetall is set to win multi-million pound contract to upgrade 150 of the UK's ageing Challenger II tankswww.telegraph.co.uk
Why do I get the sinking feeling that this, along with the rather ill-advised plan to cut back the already small tank fleet in the process, is going to backfire horribly?
Never I saw itfound anolther one
Is it possible to access this hearing, considering that it is public? Is it possible to post it in that case?One of the interesting things to emerge from last year's parliamentary defence committee hearings was the revelation that a Challenger 2 had been tested with a 150 mm gun (apparently complete with autoloader) back in 2003, not long before the Iraq War. Despite successful trials it was not adopted for service, primarily due to the fact that a brand new turret would have had to be procured for the Challenger 2 fleet in order to make it practical. Given the idiotically tight defence budget of the day, not to mention that the 'tanks are obsolete' crowd were at the height of their influence, that was a non-starter unfortunately.
Could it be possible "150mm" was typo and was intended to be "140mm"?
Rhinemetall designed a 140mm that would swap into the same space as the 120mm back in the 1980s.I do believe there is a limit to how large tank shells will get, as the larger a tank shell, the smaller number of rounds carried. A 150mm gun seems a bit much, in my opinion, for a normal main battle tank, at least. I am of the opinion that 130mm will be the largest we'll see for current generation MBTs, as these can be retrofitted to existing tanks without the need to make massive changes to the turret, and layout. Next-Generation MBTs may feature 140mm cannons (these have been tested, in the UK for sure). Again, this is based wholly on opinion.
It's sounding like the US Army is finally done with the Abrams after the A3 comes out. No more Space, Weight, and Power (SWAP) available for upgrades.Is there ever going to be a new Western MBT? Or do these vehicles just get upgraded forever?
Like the Navy's Arleigh Burke class? Brilliant in its time and to be venerated by future historians but nearing the limits of its potential in a changing world now.It's sounding like the US Army is finally done with the Abrams after the A3 comes out. No more Space, Weight, and Power (SWAP) available for upgrades.
Basically.Like the Navy's Arleigh Burke class? Brilliant in its time and to be venerated by future historians but nearing the limits of its potential in a changing world now.
A statement with many variantsBasically.
I'm honestly surprised the Abrams lasted as long as it did.
Or rather, that they thought they didn't need.that weren't needed all of a sudden.