It's paying a significant performance (and stability) penalty at the lower altitude. As a comparison, you don't fly a U-2 or RQ-4 at 10000m on purpose. Well, unless you're North Korea.

What if this is part of the development process for a larger and higher altitude unit in the future, and where the performance of this aircraft is still able to offer a capability which others on the export market do not?

Because I actually agree with you -- since CH-7 first emerged a half decade or so ago, I felt that it was a bit small, but in context of overall PRC MIC export efforts and how it intertwines with their own domestic development process it makes a fair bit of sense. The sheer number of somewhat suboptimized UAVs they have developed for export is rather mind boggling, and I don't see anything special about CH-7 in that context (it's just probably among the most "high end" of the "suboptimized UAV" categories and can meet a niche that others do not).
 
Funny how a concept art speak louder than an actual plane.
Anyone can draw, but few can deliver.
 

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom