Does anyone have anything on the XP-76 (converted/based Winjeel) and CA-28 agricultural aircraft beyond the line drawings posted earlier?
He said XP-76 not XP-67Does anyone have anything on the XP-76 (converted/based Winjeel) and CA-28 agricultural aircraft beyond the line drawings posted earlier?
From Air Enthusiast.
What exactly do you want to know Zac? There is a lot in the following books:Does anyone have anything on the XP-76 (converted/based Winjeel) and CA-28 agricultural aircraft beyond the line drawings posted earlier?
Both lower proposals look like modified CAC-25 Winjeel trainers (1955 to 1995). Prior to the 1960s, the bulk of agricultural airplanes were converted from military-surplus airframes.I would love to have copies of Keith and Derek's books! Maybe I should petition my local library...
I didn't even click that the Ceres was the CA-28, how could I forget! I was referring to this profile posted by hesham in this post which was labelled CA-28:
And the ag Winjeels (XP76?) cropped from a drawing hesham shared here:
For modelbuilding purposes I'm curious if there are any other drawings out there.
I think the first would be a fairly straightforward conversion. I'm an agplane aficionado so it would be need to see one alongside Tiger Moths, Ceres, Fletcher FU-24s etc.Both lower proposals look like modified CAC-25 Winjeel trainers (1955 to 1995). Prior to the 1960s, the bulk of agricultural airplanes were converted from military-surplus airframes.For modelbuilding purposes I'm curious if there are any other drawings out there.
That turbo-prop version will need a much larger fin for yaw stability.
A friend was kind enough to lend me his copy of this book and it is truly stunning. It also answers the questions I had about the projects mentioned earlier. I think it's about time I got my own copy.Does anyone have anything on the XP-76 (converted/based Winjeel) and CA-28 agricultural aircraft beyond the line drawings posted earlier?
You can find more information about these projects at the Moorabbin air Museum, some of the stuff CAC came up with is pretty wild. Worth a look. There is some promotional material for the xp 65, including cockpit lay out ECT . If anyone is interested just contact the Museum they are great people who love aircraft and are all volunteers. I don't get to Melbourne very often but it excellent.I have the articles you were referring to.
You can find more information about these projects at the Moorabbin air Museum, some of the stuff CAC came up with is pretty wild. Worth a look. There is some promotional material for the xp 65, including cockpit lay out ECT . If anyone is interested just contact the Museum they are great people who love aircraft and are all volunteers. I don't get to Melbourne very often but it excellent.
It has been a few years since I have been there - will have to drop in again the next time I get a chance.You can find more information about these projects at the Moorabbin air Museum, some of the stuff CAC came up with is pretty wild. Worth a look. There is some promotional material for the xp 65, including cockpit lay out ECT . If anyone is interested just contact the Museum they are great people who love aircraft and are all volunteers. I don't get to Melbourne very often but it excellent.
I have another early evolution of the cac ca23 from the project files at morabin aircraft museum.CAC CA-23
That's cool, please send them.I have another early evolution of the cac ca23 from the project files at morabin aircraft museum.
Found a few extras the middle interceptor was a 1953 project.Other interceptor proposals from CAC included:
This was followed by a Rocket (probably using similar motors to the Bell X-1) powered interceptor, the XP-47. It was to be armed with six 3inch Oerlikon or Mighty Mouse type rockets:
Regards,
Greg
Found a few extras the middle interceptor was a 1953 project.
There are no enough images to do this completely...Great find,who can collect the pieces ?.
...Got a bit of a Jack pot on dimensions and development of the CAC CA-23
It also has the original proposal, I might have to folk over some $ to get some of the other reports published.View Digital Image
recordsearch.naa.gov.au
It has (MOS) British Ministry of Supply analysis. Looks like they were keen on killing the project, the Brits always wanted Australia to be another client state
for their production.
Can you reupload it? Thanks in advance!CA-23 PDF
File on MEGA
mega.nz
Great find my dear Petrus.
Those look different from the CA.23 plans I've seen before - it looks like an Australian version of Javelin.
From reading Tony Butler's recent article on CA-23 in TAH46, then I'm really wondering where this quoted Mach 1.5 speed has come from. The Aus and UK archive documents used in this article give a predicted max speed of Mach 1.005 at 40,000ft. This level of speed seems to be consistent across the various iterations of the project, and the RAAF requirement. I'm not sure how some sources are 50% different.Going back to this question and citing a more reliable source ("Wirraway to Hornet : A history of the Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation Pty Ltd, 1936 to 1985" by Brian L. Hill), the max speed was designed to be Mach 1.5 and service ceiling of 51,000ft with a rate of climb of 17,000 fpm.