Kim Margosein said:With all the modification to make the Bugatti fit for military use, I am reminded of the Bf-209 (the speed record aircraft) that went down the same road. By the time you make the aircraft and engine robust enough to be useful, you're left with an aircraft with little or no advantage over off the shelf contemporary fighters.
Kim Margosein
In keeping with our Full-Disclosure policy, here is my summation of our first flight experience:
We intended this flight to be limited to a short hop down the runway to check power required/power available and to check control responsiveness in all three axes. Preflight preparation and before-takeoff checks were normal. Takeoff was normal and at a predetermined reduced power (80%) setting; takeoff roll was 3000 feet and I became airborne at 90 knots. I climbed to 100 AGL to check power and control responsiveness. The plane responded as expected to all power changes and control inputs. Maximum airspeed was 110 knots.
I reduced power for landing but the airplane floated much more than we anticipated. I landed further down the runway than planned but with sufficient distance to stop the plane. Unfortunately, I lost the right brake and the airplane departed the left side of the runway at slow speed. Due to heavy rains the night before, the ground was soft and the airplane tipped upward on its nose, damaging the spinner and both props.
Such is the nature of flight testing a new design. The relevant news is we successfully flew the Bugatti 100P for the first time. The plane flew beautifully.
We’ll share more photos, video, and data with you in the coming days.
August 15, 2020
Original Bugatti 100P Record plane moved in Oshkosh EAA museum
John Mellberg, who is often in the EAA museum in Oshkosh, sent the info that the original Bugatti airplane has been moved.
For those who have seen it in reality, or even the photographs only, know that the old spot was rather dark, difficult to take good photographs there for example. It just didn't do justice to such a unique airplane.
Now recently, that has been corrected at last.
Thanks John, for the photographs!