Bell Model 204 / XH-40 / UH-1 Iroquois competitors, projects and modifications

Bell 208 Twin Turbine with Continental XT67

YUH-1D 60-06030 cn 703 was bailed back to Bell, it's now preserved at Fort Rucker with the original T53 re-installed.

DTIC Report AD845032 " ENGINEERING TEST OF UH-1D HELICOPTER WITH XT67 POWER PLANT INSTALLED":

Some notes:
1. Hover performance was improved in all conditions where the T53 version was not torque-limited
2. OEI climb rate at 7000lb weight was 820ft per minute, ceiling 15,000ft
3. Standard range remained basically unchanged due to higher cruise speeds
4. Range could be increased by 30% by shutting-down one engine and accepting a cruise reduction of 15 to 35 kts.
5. Torque-limit SHP could be maintained to 6,600ft on a standard day, meaning that high-altitude climb was improved
6. Transient response of the engines was slow, though this had not been optimised

"
On a 35-degree-C day the 2-foot hover celling at 9500 pounds gross weight was 1080 feet pressure altitude with the XT67 power plant and 300 feet pressure altitude with the T53-L-11 engine."
 

Attachments

  • Bell_208_AvWeek_19650726_032.JPEG
    Bell_208_AvWeek_19650726_032.JPEG
    266.6 KB · Views: 39
  • Bell_208_AvWeek_19650517_060.JPEG
    Bell_208_AvWeek_19650517_060.JPEG
    294.5 KB · Views: 38
  • Bell_208_AvWeek_19650510_018.JPEG
    Bell_208_AvWeek_19650510_018.JPEG
    160.7 KB · Views: 39
  • Bell_AvWeek_19651108_061.JPEG
    Bell_AvWeek_19651108_061.JPEG
    237.3 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:
Bell 208 Twin Turbine with Continental XT67

YUH-1D 60-06030 cn 703 was bailed back to Bell, it's now preserved at Fort Rucker with the original T53 re-installed.

DTIC Report AD845032 " ENGINEERING TEST OF UH-1D HELICOPTER WITH XT67 POWER PLANT INSTALLED":

Some notes:
1. Hover performance was improved in all conditions where the T53 version was not torque-limited
2. OEI climb rate at 7000lb weight was 820ft per minute, ceiling 15,000ft
3. Standard range remained basically unchanged due to higher cruise speeds
4. Range could be increased by 30% by shutting-down one engine and accepting a cruise reduction of 15 to 35 kts.
5. Torque-limit SHP could be maintained to 6,600ft on a standard day, meaning that high-altitude climb was improved
6. Transient response of the engines was slow, though this had not been optimised

"
On a 35-degree-C day the 2-foot hover celling at 9500 pounds gross weight was 1080 feet pressure altitude with the XT67 power plant and 300 feet pressure altitude with the T53-L-11 engine."
The Continental XT67 (Model 217A) was a twin Turboméca Astazou X built under the June 26, 1951 licence agreement that also created the the XT51, XT65, XT65, XT72, Model 140 & 141 compressors, and the J69 (T-37 engine).
 
We can mentioned the known competitors,

- Bell 204
- Hiller Model-1045
- ?
 
We can mentioned the known competitors,

- Bell 204
- Hiller Model-1045
- ?

I can make some speculations about the competitors of this contender,

- Curtiss-Wight ?
- Doman, D-10B ?
- Flettner ?
- Gyrodyne GCA.?
- Hughes Model-?
- Kaman K-?
- Kellet KH-16 ?
- Lockheed CL-?
- McDonnell M-112 ?
- Piasecki PH-?
- Sikorsky S-59
- Wilford ?

Of course the only real tender is Sikosrky S-59 H-39,and the very close to
the right guess is McDonnell M-112.
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    108.9 KB · Views: 4
I can make some speculations about the competitors of this contender,

- Curtiss-Wight ?
- Doman, D-10B ?
- Flettner ?
- Gyrodyne GCA.?
- Hughes Model-?
- Kaman K-?
- Kellet KH-16 ?
- Lockheed CL-?
- McDonnell M-112 ?
- Piasecki PH-?
- Sikorsky S-59
- Wilford ?

Of course the only real tender is Sikosrky S-59 H-39,and the very close to
the right guess is McDonnell M-112.
Please stop with these nonsense speculation posts.

If you have concrete information about contenders for a competition, state them (with sources). Just randomly listing every company that might possibly have submitted a design is meaningless noise.
 
From some 20 companies that entered the competition for a new utility helicopter, Bell Helicopter was picked as the winner.
Bill Siuru's book for Aero Publishers on the Huey.

Lou Drendel

The announcement that Bell’s design had been chosen from the 20 entries came on 23 February 1955.

Aviation Week 21 Feb 1955 differs:

Bell Helicopter Design Wins Stiff Competition Bell Aircraft Corp. last week was selected over seven other manufacturers to develop a new utility helicopter for the U. S. Army.

In the hottest aircraft competition of Army history, a yearlong race that attracted more industry attention than many Air Force and Navy design efforts Bell was awarded a contract for preliminary engineering and a mockup.

[...]

Eight Proposals—Keen interest in the utility copter competition started a year ago, was evidenced by designs from eight manufacturers. Some of them, including Bell, submitted more than one proposal. All entrants worked under high pressure to meet Armv deadlines. First evaluation of the proposals was made by USAF, which acts as a purchasing agent for the Army. Final announcement of Bells selection was made by the Department of Defense.
 
Last edited:
It is likely that 20 proposals were received from 8 manufacturers, this would make most sense, and mean Bill Siuru made an error.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom